Importantly, the law authorizing this doesn’t authorize the president to reverse the ban. Trump has used it before too.

So reversing this likely means an unusual ruling from the courts, or getting congress to change things. Both possible, but take a lot more effort than simply issuing an executive order.

27 points
*

People should read the first chapter of “The Ministry for the Future”. People will start dieing by the millions due to heat waves, it’s going to happen even if we stop burning oil now because of how long the feedback loop takes. Drilling more lengthens this trend into a future where billions die.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Mind you, if we actually stop burning all fossil fuels, end deforestation, and stop dumping a few trace gases into the atmosphere, the CO2 concentration will drop, resulting in temperatures coming something close to stabilization.

This doesn’t mean the overall system is stable; there will still be ice melting (albeit more slowly than if we kept on burning stuff) but it’s a vast improvement over the alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That entire book should be required reading for everyone over the age of thirty.

And I’m only setting the cut off there because the under thirties have enough shit on their plates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

He is relying on an obscure provision of a 1953 law, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, which he says gives him the authority for this executive order.

He could have done this the entire time!?!?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

He could have, but didn’t need to; he could simply choose to not issue leases in these places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
6 points

Yes…that oil increase is largely on private land, which means the President has had limited power to do anything about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The ban affects the entire Eastern Seaboard, the Pacific Coast along California, Oregon and Washington, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the Northern Bering Sea.

So that basically just leaves the Texas and Louisiana Gulf coast, and part of the Alaskan coast?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yes, and state waters (those less than 3 miles from shore) where the federal government isn’t the one making the management decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And Hawaii?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t see that in the list, but Hawaii has a very different geology which makes oil much less likely there

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure—I thought the previous comment was just trying to identify any US coastlines not on the list, not filtering by reason for exclusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hilarious. Biden oversaw record oil and gas drilling throughout his entire presidency, dwarfing that of W, Obama, and Trump.

Now he was to slow things down so Dems can score political points when Repugs immediately open the drilling floodgates. Seriously pathetic Biden, you could have actually done something for the environment during the past 4 years but chose corporate profits over people’s lives instead, every time.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

This feels kinda like bike shedding to bring up currently with the executive, legislative, and judicial branches all bought and paid for by oligarchs, but isn’t that executive branch overreach where the legislative branch should be who is determining this?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 8.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 488K

    Comments