13 points

Reject Web technologies - embrace native mobile app development

Compose feels like React but without the bad JavaScript parts, really pleasant experience!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Ah, yes, let’s have thousands of specialized apps, each with uniquely expiring dependencies and vulnerabilities, instead of one browser that can work with apps that are standardized for OSS, UI, accessibility, performance, inspection by humans and machines, and security.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Funnily enough, I’ve found JavaScript to be by far the worst offender for expiring dependencies and vulnerabilities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

How are you supposed to develop web applications then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s the neat part - you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I love Compose, creating UI is actually fun. The whole ViewModel thing though I don’t love

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I love Compose, creating UI is actually fun.

It’s a good time, for sure. That being said, I’ve stopped working with UI, and I don’t really miss it. I still do some side projects in Compose though, and it’s always way better than XML.

The whole ViewModel thing though I don’t love

When it clicks, it’s actually not that bad imo. I think the main problem is that Google aren’t really explicit enough about how to leverage them effectively, and as such they can be pretty hard to get right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

If you know HTML and Python already I would recommend going for something like jinja2 + flask or fastapi and try some htmx stuff no need to use everything you can just refresh the site at the beginning. This should be pretty beginner friendly. It really depends on what you want to do. I don’t know much about Hugo or Publii. If you want to make an interactive website and not just a blog or static website I would advise you against using either of the two. If you want to get a job in frontend webdev I would advise you to learn javascript (https://javascript.info/) and some framwork like react also learn tailwind or css.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ll check those out and see if I can get a good workflow going for it.

I wanted my first web project to be a static site since I really only need a blog at this point in time. The use case for my blog really would be to write about chemistry and chemical engineering stuff I think is cool. Having a worksheet repository for my students as well that they could access with some encryption so the access is restricted. I’d love to try the fancy stuff on websites, I just need to get the poison of “JavaScript is spyware” out of my head.

It’s pretty disorienting to figure out the “right” way of learning web development after the loads of slander I’ve seen in memes. Im sure youve seen the same about React, JavaScript, and something about “NodeJS”. I wasn’t really too aware of software other than doing calculations on data collected from DAQs. Any resources you’d recommend to check out?

I guess I should ask the question, what exactly is all the fuss about surrounding some of the frameworks? I definitely can see the argument about adding more layers of abstraction can obfuscate the underlying mechanisms of the codes thus increasing the amount of potential vulnerabilities. Particular companies and developers turning evil is also. But some of the rhetoric becomes “They’ll put a miner for your crypto” “They’ll siphon every facet of information about you”. The most bizarre I read was how to figure out the outline of 3D objects surrounding the user via the pattern in white noise detected by an interference pattern.

Histrionics aside, is there a good resource that I can read that dismisses common falsehoods that is generally reflective of what constitutes a " good" framework? Thanks for the help!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

https://hypermedia.systems/introduction/ maybe this is a good read if you do want to go a bit against the current webdev mainstream. Disclaimer: I have not read it yet but i will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I thought HTMX was a joke, but they’re serious.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I am serious

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

and don’t call me Shirley.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

C’mon, what’s not to like about bonding every UI action against a remote server? What’s a few milliseconds anyway? I’m sure it works fine over cellular networks. I mean, it works great on my dev machine! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What kind of you UI action are you talking about? Most of the time you need data from the server and if you want have some animations with css it will be client side anyway also it’s not like you cannot write JS. I mean downloading thousands of lines of js for some web framework over cellular does not sound better tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

That’s a strawman. I don’t need 1000s of lines of JS to swap a UI. I can do it in 1 line with Web Components: oldElement.replaceWith(newElement). And those modules can be lazy loaded like anything else.

This is just DX in name of UX, which is almost never a good idea.

And maybe you’re fine with throwing a server computation for every single UI change, but I’m not made of money and I much rather have stuff on a CDN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I personally don’t like the htmx style of coding. It often feels like having to explain what I want to do to someone else using only a limited set of custom words, instead of just doing it myself.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I understand you but for me it’s the opposite I am not bound to using js for everything and can just return html from the server like I want. Also everything else still works I can write js if I want to. Htmx gives me more words I can use in html not less. Also I can manage the state via the url and the server. In other frameworks I often had the problem that I was writing the same logic twice in backend and frontend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Exactly. Not everything needs to be a goddamn SPA!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I just peeked at the docs and right off the bat I don’t like how they have conflicting attributes like hx-get and hx-post. What happens if both are set at the same time? Why not just have hx-method?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m good with my Vue, thanks. I hate React though. I can see htmx simplifying some things and being adopted by front-end frameworks. The same way improvements in HTML and CSS have been adopted.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Vue and AlpineJS for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

When you say “and”, do you mean together?

I love Vue, first time I’ve heard of AlpineJS. From my quick searching, they seem pretty similar. What advantages does one have over the other? Thanks :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Ah, sorry, that was a bit confusing on my part. I use them entirely separate. Here are some real world examples:

Vue: new projects that will require multiple components, state management, etc.

AlpineJS: when I have a tiny project/demo that needs reactivity, or if I have an existing HTML setup that needs state management and reactivity bolted on after the fact (like an old site or something like that).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fellow Vue enjoyer! I love Vue, it’s so friendly. Maintaining a complex React app feels like getting dragged behind a truck down a one way road.

(Did you like my two way data binding joke there?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hello sane friend! You used your joke to great effect!

Did you like my useEffect joke haha

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments