3 points

permalink
report
reply
16 points

This was pretty much what set me on the path to radicalisation.

The system felt so unfair and then to learn that there were people who could do exactly this just because they were born into a family with large capital it was infuriating.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

That’s why I dislike these kinds of memes that say, “Oh, I shouldn’t be working all day; I should be living a life of leisure and free to create”.They feel like the conservative strawman of the “lazy leftist who just envies the rich”.

Living as the meme describes inherently requires the exploitation of labor. Unless a society becomes technologically advanced enough to achieve fully automated post-scarcity, meeting a person’s needs still requires a certain amount of human labor. The issue under capitalism is that some people do live as the meme describes, and they do so by exploiting the labor of others through capital. As a result, the rest of us struggle even more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not exactly a rebuttal, more of an addendum:

Artists can seek personal fulfillment, which may indirectly contribute something of value for society, or they can directly contribute value to society by creating art for others. If this value is greater than or equal to that which is required to sustain them, then exploitation is not inherently necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hey want to throw up? Here’s a Koch heir using daddy’s blood money to be a pretend “creative.”

https://youtu.be/QEw0Whi73C0?si=ivxFFl68pa3XkdKb

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What a fucking jerkoff, billions of dollars at his disposal, he’s probably got designers and renowned artists on speed dial…

…and the most creative he can get is “a shirt, but in a fun print!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

One doesn’t even get to focus on paying just for oneself.

One has to pay for Zuck/Bezos/Musk/Cook/Trump first.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Was talking to a friend about AI and job loss and eventually he says something about “those people in the past talking about reducing the population” unfortunately being possibly necessary… I think he was referring to some things written on the Georgia guidestones, but Jesus fucking Christ…

Essentially “How many people are allowed to live is entirely dependent on how much labor Mr.Money needs.”

🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

innovating or being less wasteful??

(·•᷄_•᷅ )

arguing to reduce the population so the privileged can have even more privilege?

( ˶ˆᗜˆ˵ )

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

You and everyone else who’s been ingrained with the demented idea that mankind was ‘designated’ to fight each other for survival can all go fight each other for your survival and leave the rest of us out of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

‘Man’ isn’t ‘designated’ to anything. We just exist and are sentient and able to think about what we would like our lives to look like. Most people would like to live a life beyond working 40 hours a week on a job they don’t enjoy and where they have no say in anything. We have enough resources to make sure everyone has a home and food and can live a fulfilling life, if only those resources were divided in a fair way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

moderated lmaoo

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I bet you were very badly wrong in your comment, but I would have at least like to see it (and down vote it too if it deserved it). I don’t need protection from stupid, just illegal or outright racist/offensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 276K

    Comments