Ok so apparently it is an article, not a bulletpoint of the other article as the ui would suggest. According to the article, some model made a while ago predicts we should only be at 1.3% warming this year and not 1.5%. That missing 0.2% is whats the mistery, so kind of misleading headline, especially if you put it in a place that doesn’t make it look like an article at all. I only found out because I accidentally clicked on it.

The article (npr.org)

21 points

I just assumed it was sarcasm :D

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I shared this before. The war on NPR for reporting facts in the past years has forced it’s editorial team to “soften” some of these facts so conservatives don’t get triggered. They receive public money from the gov and all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes. The corporate oligarchy owns everything now. We let the most narcissistic prosper with capitalism until they seized the means of democracy. Now the planet will be destroyed. Turns out greed is the great filter.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Who wrote this headline, an AI? It being hotter than models predicted does not mean we didn’t expect it to be hotter. A better title could’ve been: “2024 was mysteriously hotter than climate science predicted” or “global heating smashes scientists’ expectations”

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Maybe the models didn’t place it as the hottest. Even with an upward trend, not every year has to be hotter than the previous and other factors (or even model inaccuracies) can yield unexplained results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

“Tide goes in, tide goes out. You can’t explain that.” - Bill O’Reilly

permalink
report
reply
25 points

“Money goes in, lies go out. You’re not allowed to explain that” - first page of the Faux News employee handbook

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

1.5°C not %

permalink
report
reply