0 points

Is it too cynical to say that her billion dollar campaign was a money laundering operation?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

A lot of this information is public because they had to file their campaign spend with the FEC. They spent a fuck ton buying ad spots on social media, TV, billboards, print, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They gave a lot of money to their consultants and advertisers, all perfectly legal.

Cui bono?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

By god that seems like the dumbest possible choice given that the Democrats are routinely criticized for being elite and out of touch.

How about a giant, ever gazing, magical, orb displaying our leader’s head with a command for the public? Surely that will make us seem down to earth and in touch with the common person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The economic messaging was the main thing but even taking that as a given that they had to follow their donors’ interests, it was just a really poorly executed campaign. Had to be to get the worst results since the Republicans won California. Tbh Harris just has terrible political instincts and she would’ve never survived a competitive primary (as evidenced by 2020).

One thing that’s staggering to me is that they left Hasan Piker as an untapped resource. I’m not like a big fan of his but if you have this field of streamers where all the big names are right-wing, except one, you should really consider, like, figuring out what he’s tapping into or doing right, idk, hire him as a consultant, go on his stream, do something with him. The Democrats are so slow to adapt strategically while the Republicans are much quicker to adapt, and idk what that’s about, complacency ig.

Obviously the Dick Cheney strategy was completely useless, as usual. Democrats are married to this conventional wisdom, treated as a truism, that the way to win is by appealing to the median centrist voter, along this purely one dimensional spectrum of politics which is completely divorced from reality. I suspect the article is correct that they’re too caught up in analytics that they lose sight of how people actually think.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Yeah don’t forget to add the fact she couldn’t differentiate herself from biden on the palestine issue

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Yeah don’t forget to add the fact she couldn’t differentiate herself from biden on the palestine issue

She absolutely could have. She chose not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Don’t over analyze it, America is not ready for a woman to be president. So many women just want to take down other women that its just not time, which is sad. Adding some racial diversity in there just sealed the deal.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Funny how female Democratic senators won in three of the swing states Kamala lost, almost as if sexism wasn’t the deciding factor… but that could imply that Kamala failed for a reason that’s potentially her own fault, which might require some kind of self-reflection on the part of the Democratic party, and we absolutely can’t have that under any circumstances. The Democrats can never fail, they can only be failed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

More women voted for Hillary than Kamala by percent. The gender gap was way wider too. You can literally just look at the statistics and disprove your own bullshit. Kamala didn’t lose because she was a woman because even compared to the other recent woman candidate she did poorly with women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We don’t need campaign insiders to tell us anything. We watched her do all the wrong things, just as any corporate democrat candidate would. It’s not like anything was a secret. If she wanted workers’ votes, all she had to do was actually push some decent policies.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

We don’t need campaign insiders to tell us anything.

Mostly because they haven’t learned shit. They still think they just needed more time or to change their advertising strategy. It’s infuriating. It’s not how the message was presented, it’s the damn message!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

all she had to do was actually push some decent policies.

yeah you showed that woman what for, and the next 4 are going to be simply GRAND.

pfft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wasn’t trying to show her anything. Why would I? Why would anyone? You have really strange views on how people choose who to vote for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

sure thing sparky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I held my nose and voted for her. She would have been so much better then Trump but she was still a bad candidate.

Critiquing the unpopular policies she ran under and lost with might help the Democratic party get it’s shit together next time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

so you want a cookie?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

yeah i’d like to hear from Dem voters that didn’t vote for Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Like for realsies, or just to shout at them? Because this being lemmy and all…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The people you are looking for are white men and hispanic men.

Those were the biggest voter group shifts that voted for Biden but didn’t vote for Harris.

So the simple answer is that Machismo culture makes too many big strong American men literallt too insecure to vote for a woman

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

pinky swear for reals

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments