Progressive politics is about objectivity and empathy. It’s built on fundamental values like equality, freedom, and human rights. These things don’t change depending on who is in power.

Conservativism is entirely based upon personalities. It’s a justification for selfishness, ruthlessness, and narcissism in service of the Self. The Self is defined by the current leader of any given conservative party, and that identity is what sets the agenda.

Echo chambers are bad for both groups, but for different reasons. Progressive echo chambers find their fundamental ideology as self-evident and rational. It’s easy to fall into the idea that everyone thinks as you do, and while everyone may not be selfless, everyone should at least remain consistent in their ideology.

Conservative echo chambers promote a similar trap, except the message is that everyone is just out for themselves, so it’s OK to be as evil as you want to be. There is no good greater than the self, so ideology is entirely negotiable. If you must lie, cheat, murder, enslave, or be rude in order to win, then that action is righteous because it is in service of the self.

Progressives emerge from their echo chamber with naivety and are shocked to learn that everyone isn’t interested in rowing in the same direction. Conservatives emerge as acolytes, dedicated to destroying anyone who would stand opposed to their goals.

There is a lot of overlap between the two mistakes, but they are also fundamentally different in many inportant ways.

Seems fit for the community as this is more “real life discussion” than “rage inducing news bait”

I think things that keep you engaged mentally, even if they’re memes, can keep you thinking about issues even when you’re away from that media.

I was raised solidly conservative, but through exposure to issues and talking with people and learning the finer points of issues, it really made me question things. I went from thinking things where the way they were for good reason (maintaining status quo) to more asking why things should stop where they are and not improve to help more people (progressiveness).

Some people can hear a “fact” and be satisfied they have an answer with no more desire to expand on that. You’re seeing things that make you question things you’ve felt were true as your mind saw them and your opinions are evolving. I don’t think there’s an inherit way people can form their opinions. You could read conservative media and see fallacy in it. I lean left a decent bit, but I read plenty on Lemmy that is ridiculous to me, especially authoritarian left views.

I think people go more conservative when they feel they are losing something. Prosperity, career trajectory, friendly/familial bonds, social status. I don’t think that is the way to get things back, but when you’re afraid of losing things, you tend to lose some rationality as you desperately cling to things. If you can blame wokeness on why your jokes and treatment of people isn’t cool anymore, if you can blame cheap migrant labor for why your career isn’t advancing, if you can blame other people why you aren’t getting paid enough to get by, you maintain your sense of self and can externalize a real problem.

I don’t want to outright say those problems aren’t real, because they are to those feeling them. I just think more of the root causes are systematic, and having those scapegoats helps maintain status quo.

I like Lemmy not because it is leftist, but moreso that it is small enough I get to know individuals a bit more deeply that I can from bigger platforms. People can keep it real without worrying about pleasing a very wide general audience. For example, I don’t personally know any trans people in real life. With the high visibility they have here, I’ve gotten a better grasp of many issues from just sitting here and paying attention. It’s given me great opportunity to start to learn about something I didn’t really know how to approach mentally. I feel it’s been really good to get to know them and understand a bit of where they’re coming from. If I hadn’t been here with an openness to get to know them, I’d still just be lost and confused and while I never had an issue with trans people, I just plain didn’t understand. For some people that can turn to distrust.

Point being, I think it is just as much what you personally are looking for out of the content as it is for you to be exposed to the content itself. If you want to expand your mind and grow, you can do that, and if you want to circle the wagons, you can do that too. I feel you will eventually shift naturally to things that support that desire to grow or become walled off, but it isn’t inherent to the content itself.

I think about algorithms and how they can divide people. We don’t get the same search results. It’s all based on what that site thinks we’d like and sends us down a rabbit hole to keep us watching tapping and clicking.

Let’s say you’re learning how to grow a house plant. Look it up on youtube and in the recommendeds balcony flower box tutorials, so you watch that out of curiosity. Then how to plant a small garden and the best underrated garden tools. Suddenly every time you open youtube logged in it wants you to watch stuff about gravity fed irrigation systems for small scale homesteading crop production and you’re like “how did I get here?”

Now imagine the political topics. Rage bait and us vs them gets attention and attention makes money. Right gravitates to right and left gravitates to left getting more and more pissed at each other and not enough people asking “how did we get here?”

Post seems fit for the community as this is more “real life discussion” than “rage inducing news bait” and appears asked in good faith.

OP, disregard this comment: just commenting this per admin suggestion to sticky it to get ahead of any potential reports.