Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

-64 points

Hah what? So you are running from bad corporations to daddy government? Somwhere I took another turn because this journey turned me into a libertarian.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

If workers run the government, then sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

In theory it’s great, but have you seen the complete fucking braindead idiots we share this world with?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

In India we have a corporation named AMUL. It is collectively run by 3.6 Million farmers. It has wide variety of dairy products such as milk, yoghurt, ice cream, chocolates etc. If farmers can… Then what’s wrong in believing we can.

Edit, its not 5000, it is 3.6 Million milk producers

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You do realize that some of these idiots have way more power (money) than they should have any right to? Elon Musk, Bobby Kotick, …

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The problem is: intelligence doesn’t help either. Sure, it lets you grasp problems pretty fast, makes you a good learner but do you have any ideas how many psychopaths are actually gifted?

As an autistic individual, I‘d say the autistic way would be pretty awesome as a government. You have to tell the truth and are not allowed to care how anyone receives it (what could go wrong, right?). I‘m obviously joking, mostly. I‘d explore it though.

I think the current way is the worst (turning more populist every day) because the majority of people is rather unintelligent and does not have a logical concept on life (from an autistic standpoint).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

That’s assuming that all workers have good intentions and consider the good of all humans before power.

Well, surprise! Workers are humans. And we have seen many times what happens when uncontrolled power has been given to any human group or individual humans.

There should be no power to the government. Only management positions. And those management positions need to be open to all people with abilities regarding those management positions.

Of course this discussion in this form is an oversimplification (e.g. no mention of whether/how to run a police force, a judiciary, or a military), but the point is that not only a “government being run by workers” wouldn’t solve any problem, it would introduce even more, in my opinion. It’s just as bad as effectively letting the corporations or rich people run the government. Looks at the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There should be no power to the government. Only management positions. And those management positions need to be open to all people with abilities regarding those management positions.

Yo. You just described a worker run government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If there’s one form of social structure that has a worse track with fewer successful examples than communism, it’s libertarianism. Hope you like bears.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Libertarian? Im not American, so im unfamiliar – isn’t that one just the Republican party with extra pedophilia?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I’m not American either so idk

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

As an American in order to understand our libertarians you must first understand the gilded age of American capitalism. It was an era of extreme wealth disparity, zero regulations, and everything was disgusting and dangerous. Libertarians dislike everything that ended that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Well, libertarian doesn’t necessarily mean someone in line with the Libertarian Party of the US. If we want to consider the meanings of these terms by referring to how they are understood to in the US, we would be all very confused, since everything in the US seems to have a twisted meaning.

See for example, their Fascist party is called the “Republican Party”… Their Right-center oriented party is often referred to as a “left-leaning” party… and finally there’s another right-wing party with slightly different positions than the fascist party, calling themselves the “Libertarian Party”, because why not! 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

You know that Rothbard stole that term from anarcho-communists (libertarian socialists), right?

Edit: Thought you meant right-wing libertarianism. Was confused, since IMHO Marx (without Lenin/Mao/etc.) is actually quite compatible with left-wing libertarianism. Even if he had a personal feud with Bakunin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Libertarian cannot work without socialism essentially. You cannot have a free market where the worker doesn’t own the means of production. Power will always pool to select individuals and those who have collected power have shown no remotely reliable track record to serve humanity’s best interest over their own. In fact, it’s regularly shown the exact opposite. Libertarianism is just an excuse to act against the good of society for your own benefit and fuck anyone you step on along the way. I’ve never heard a defense of libertarianism that is actually good for society. It’s basically just dressing up the belief you can’t be forced to do good, so you can’t get in trouble if you do bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you’re describing right libertarianism (which is what is known as libertarianism in the US, I think), which is influenced mainly by the ideas of Ayn Rand.

But there is also left libertarianism, which is not based on “free market” as per those libertarians. Examples of people on this spectrum I think would be Noam Chomsky (US), Bernie Sanders (US), Jeremy Corbyn (UK)… and historically: Nestor Makhno (Ukraine), National confederation of labor (Spain, fighting against Franco), Iberian Anarchist Federation (Same), and effectively any other left-leaning Anarchism-oriented person, movement or party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Looking into it, I can see some issues with the idea (I don’t understand how it wouldn’t fall pretty to the tragedy of the commons), plus I definitely don’t think Sanders would fit into there. I don’t see any of his proclaimed positions fitting into any definition of left-libertarian. Plus I don’t see how left-libertarian wouldn’t fall prey to the same problem we have with capitalism now, despite being an anti-capitalist notion. It’s strong sense of individual ownership of anything other than natural resources seems at odds with a lot of other socialist concepts. I will caveat all of this with saying I have a very limited understanding of left-libertarianism, but just reading any given definition just seems to give rise to very clear contradictions. I feel like either it is problematic or no one is really sharing good definitions of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I ran from bad corporations to workplace democracy where does that place me?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Full democracy? If so then rather something liberal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Why do so many people think left vs right is government vs no government? It’s fucking baffling. You think leftists just love the government? Just… why?? Who told you that? Why do you believe them?

“So long as the state exists there is no freedom. When there is freedom, there will be no state.”

So much love for state, here…

I’ll tell you something that might shock you. I’m pretty much a communist. I also hate the state. Does that confuse you? It shouldn’t!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because all they know of history is the soviet union

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because they confuse the history of the soviet union with the propaganda they’ve been fed about it.

fixed that for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Funny is that the same thinking apply to som left groups as well. (like anarchism)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Please tell me I misunderstood, and that you aren’t implying anarchists love the state?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

I’m sorry I assumed Marxism-Leninism instead of libertarian socialism because of the predominant tankie culture here on lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I never knew what a tankie was until I came to Lemmy… now I see it everywhere. It’s gross…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Don’t let the tankies steal the term “communism”.

I even don’t want to give up Marx.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

it be a slippery slope

permalink
report
reply
117 points

Context for those who are baffled (I was)

https://news.itsfoss.com/linus-torvalds-woke-communists/

No Linus hasn’t grabbed a red rag and isn’t off to foment revolution

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

I liked the take by the utterly clueless Polish guy in the comment. I think his complete lack of understanding of any context is quite typical of online political conversation, especially when semantics come into play.

Also Linus did call for “Total world domination” (I have the tshirt).

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes of course, who doesn’t remember how woke Lenin created a woke revolution based on woke teachings of woke Marx and even woker Engels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Guy’s Finnish. The chances of him being actually communist are pretty much zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This might be a dumb question: what do you mean? I know very little about Finland, so I’m just genuinely curious. Are the Finns in particular well-known for being anti-communist or is it more like a geopolitical thing since they share a border with Russia?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Geopolitical yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t know where this idea that all Finns are anti-communist comes from. Finland had one of the strongest communist movements in Western Europe during the cold war. At the height of their popularity about one in four Finns voted for communists in elections. Card carrying communists sat as ministers in multiple cabinets, up to the early 1980s. Like many young people of his generation, Linus Torvalds’ father was a member of the Communist Party of Finland in the 1970s. And all this happened after Finland had fought against the Soviet Union in the 2nd world war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

His father was into the communist party

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

unfortunately I think this is just him saying he’s a “woke communist” if being a woke communist is atheism, women’s rights, and gun control. I don’t think he’s a marxist of any stripe it seems. However, I am willing to be corrected here. I’ve only seen this post regarding to him

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Welcome comrade

permalink
report
reply
9 points

🫡

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

I too just turned into a Marxist after finding out about Linux and software freedom in 2020 lol

I think there might be more than a handful of us. Welcome, comrade.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

🫡

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 6.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.6K

    Posts

  • 180K

    Comments