I’m sorry but I really don’t see the point in these distros way down the line. You can add anything to Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Arch, etc.
That’s fair. But people are busy/lazy/not interested. More downstream distros that require less customization or tweaking will always be there for those people.
As an example, why would I install Ubuntu and remove Snaps and go on a massive customization spree when Mint has already done half of the work for me? It makes it easier for me to just sit down and get started and that is what many users expect. Those that want to tinker or are more picky and want to have it just so can install whatever they want and customize as much as they want.
I also sometimes feel there are way too many unnecessary options, but they’re obviously not for me. The more choices, the better chances to find exactly what you’re looking for and that’s not a bad thing in my opinion.
If you want to tinker a lot, you can always use Arch. But if you’re like me and just want your computer to work, Mint is absolutely fantastic. And I’ve run all my steam games on it without any issues. Mind you, those games were all bought for the Steam Deck, so compatibility is already sorted.
The current stable release is a Gnome fork abomination and the current alpha has a trillion issues. Absolutely terrible for games.
I’ve never used it myself, but I’ve also never heard a bad word said about it. Seems to be a pretty solid little distro.
I just left Pop!_OS for Fedora because it being based on Ubuntu 22.04 means that it’s getting fewer and fewer critical updates for me, and their website doesn’t make any indication that they intend to change that any time soon.
It really isn’t. I’m not digging on PopOS, but articles like this make it seem like there is a world of difference in performance between distributions, and that’s just not true.
