Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced she will not attend Donald Trump’s inauguration, stating, “I don’t celebrate rapists,” referencing Trump’s history of sexual assault allegations.

While Trump has never been convicted of rape, a jury found him civilly liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll.

Ocasio-Cortez also criticized TikTok for crediting Trump with restoring service in the U.S., calling it a propaganda move.

She warned of social media platforms being weaponized by right-wing interests, claiming they are contributing to the rise of “21st-century fascism” under the incoming administration.

282 points

Glad there is at least one politician that can speak frankly about the felon in chief.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

That’s why I think not allowing her to be on the Oversight committee was shortsighted, she makes great opposition against MAGA and I want to see more of her speaking the voice of reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Dems would rather Trump get away with everything than anyone ever call them out on anything

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

That’s why I think not allowing her to be on the Oversight committee was shortsighted

It’s not shortsighted, it’s intentional. The Democratic Party leadership is Blue MAGA because they don’t want to ruffle the feathers of their corporate donors. Like with many politicians of either side of the aisle, Nancy Pelosi made money buying stocks of companies who are just granted government contracts. Why would she and the DNC want to curtail the power of oligarchs who pays their salaries by appointing progressives instead?

America is heading into an oligarchy, if not corporate fascism. But it’s not too late yet. As an outsider looking at American politics, it’s easier to organise on local level and then influence the federal level. I believe progressives should start mobilising on grassroots campaigning at the local level. That way, they could spread their influence up to the federal level. The way I see it, the MAGA is obviously influenced by the Tea Party movement. Progressives should do something similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, and having Red MAGA around let’s then try and attract votes with “look how horrible they are, vote for us so you don’t get them”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Commander in thief

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

“Adjudicated Rapist”.

https://newrepublic.com/post/174448/judge-e-jean-carroll-case-yes-donald-trump-rapist

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that [rape, as ‘commonly’ understood].”

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Also as federal law defines rape.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Be very careful. Remember, ABC and George Stephonopalous (or however you spell his name) just had to cough up $15 million and apologize to Trump for repeating this.

I wish I was joking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

They settled a case that wasn’t by any means open and shut. And in the context of that case Stephenpolous was talking about the legal case Trump was involved in, which specifically was not rape according to the jury but sexual assault.

In this case, aoc isn’t referring to a case but in general that Trump is a rapist so she is standing on much firmer ground since she isn’t talking about specific facts, Trump is a public figure, and I doubt anyone could say that aoc is lying with malice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She didn’t say ‘convicted’ which makes her case way easier, just point to the judge and shrug

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Nah. Donald Trump is a rapist who raped E. Jean Carroll, among others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I feel that was more of an offering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They didn’t have to. They chose to roll over like fucking cowards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I refuse to qualify the term rape. Trump raped Carroll - there are no conditions or clarifications needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Adjudicated rapist is not the same as convicted rapist. That’s the real issue. Trump was never charged with rape.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I don’t disagree and I’d concede the point if I was talking to a lawyer or other legal expert that was having a discussion with me in good faith.

These fucks exploit the shit out of good faith and technicalities so fuck it.

You’re[1] wrong, it was rape.

  1. Pst, I’m not specifically speaking to you Jordan but in a generalized sense. We need to call rape rape.
permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points
*

It seems people have forgotten about several other rape cases including one for a teen in 1996. This case disappeared all of a sudden. Either a payoff or a threat quashed the case. There is a docket number and it really exists.

permalink
report
reply
52 points
*

What about Brock Allen Turner? We all remember the scumbag rapist Brock Allen Turner from Stanford, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Not to sound like one of those “All Lives Matter” assholes, but I think we can agree that all rapists should be named, shamed, and sent to an island with only cacti and porcupines.

But an important difference between DJT and BAT is that one of them is now the fucking president. Again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The other one could be later. Wealthy brat who can get away with anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Oh yeah, I remember the rapist Brock Allen Turner, who is a rapist

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Didn’t he try to change his name?

permalink
report
parent
reply
118 points

This is how you take the moral high ground, not by ceding ground to the far-right.

permalink
report
reply
116 points

Per usual, she’s probably our best hope of a high profile progressive in office (and a potential do-over of 2016 when we didn’t get Bernie if Dems get some sense).

Right on the money too about social media. I think I’m more concerned about that than I am about Trump himself. I really don’t want Zoomers to end up the next conservative generation; like the Boomers and Gen Xers who suck Reagan dick after the 80s because their misunderstanding of what actually happened during his presidency. Confirmation bias is strong and that’ll fuck the US long after Trump dies.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Dems would rather sell us to fascism than put a progressive in office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
*

This assumes a progressive candidate would win, though. Given this last election, I don’t think that’s a particularly safe bet to make. Honestly, I don’t think that anyone on the left could have won, following Biden. People were so disgusted with his performance they elected trump again, for fucks sake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s kind of hard to overlook 89 million eligible voters who stayed home after Kamala gladhanded war criminals on the campaign trail. The idgaf contingent is a bigger bloc than there were votes for either candidate. This is why polling shows widespread support for Dem policy, but the Dems themselves struggle to remain electable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The issue, as I see it, isn’t that they liked his policies or wanted to move right. What the public wanted was change, some drastic move away from the system we have. The Democrats explicitly campaigned on maintaining the current world order.

So when we, rightfully, said that Trump will destroy America, may who aren’t engaged with politics thought that was a good thing.

Look how much the country embraced Luigi even though he was pure destruction (i.e. killing someone with no plan on how that would fix anything). We need Luigi energy with a real plan to fix the country. We need a new Roosevelt and AOC seems the best fit for the job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even though he made it so medicare can negotiate drug prices?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

They need to protect her at all costs, because they will kill her.

This isn’t like a threat or a joke or something.

Look at Fred Hampton.

Look at MLK. Look at Malcolm…

Look at RFK. The original. The dad. No brain worm (that we know about). Side note, there’s an HBO documentary series about RFK that’s fantastic. He was one of the good ones. Things might have turned out very different if not for Sirhan^2. Fucking tragedy.

I truly fear for AOC.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I really hope AOC knows how to defend herself. And owns a gun for if someone breaks into her house. She needs to be safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Please don’t mention Bernie anymore. They postponed him and now he’s just too old, we need to stop with the old people. AOC is a great choice, and there needs to be full backing on that because the old corporate guard has some loser in mind, I assume.

Probably Kamala again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Probably Kamala again.

NOW is the time to change this. Do not waste it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I think I am done voting for liberals. They come up with endless excuses why they cannot help the working class and when finally do anything it is to fund Israel’s genocide or to give massive wins to Republicans by banning Tiktok the day before Trump was sworn in just so he could unban it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The male zoomers are hardcore Trumpers. Uninformed from shitty social media takes and no understanding of civics. The damage is already done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t discount the damage to our social cohesiveness done by corporations monetizing literally everything.

Social networks and dating apps, on top of the removal of most avenues toward middle class incomes, have led to an entire generation with few employment or romance prospects, creating a loneliness epidemic.

This gives shit bags like andrew tate a crack to worm into and create an incel/fascist incubation machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Gen X’er here… When '88 rolled around and Poppy Bush was running was my first election.

Kept asking the “greatest” and boomers: “So, wait, either he’s lying about his involvement in Iran/Contra, is dirty as fuck and shouldn’t be elected, or he legit had no clue, wasn’t involved, and is incompetent for a former CIA director and shouldn’t be elected. Which is it?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Gen Xers who suck Reagan dick after the 80s because their misunderstanding of what actually happened during his presidency.

So, like, one guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah dude, I’m fairly confident most of us dislike Reagan a fucking lot.

At least, most people in my generation that I hang out with, so it could be self selecting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’d be surprised how many people still seem to believe in Reaganomics, and far too many either forgot about Iran-Contra or still believe he was the deal maker that saved the day.

But yes, probably more boomers than Gen X. X is in a weird spot, cause the people I’m thinking of are borderline Boomers and mostly just aren’t well informed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Hold onto her, after Trump has pardoned the Jan 6 people as well as the proud boy leader he’s proven that it isn’t a crime if you do it in Trumps name

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She’s gonna have some Hillary-like issues, in that the GOP has spent a decade demonizing her already.

Obama hit them hard because they didn’t see him coming. He went from a relative unknown (on the national stage) to the Presidency in about 12 seconds, and they had been prepping for a fight against Hillary even then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The issue was that Hilary didn’t have any strong defenders.

Trump has proven that being hated isn’t fatal to politics so long as there are others who love you.

Americans want passion and someone who is willing to fight for them rather than the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 544K

    Comments