A Milwaukee-based CBS affiliate has dismissed one of its weather presenters after she reportedly called Elon Musk a Nazi on social media, over a gesture the tech billionaire made during an inauguration rally for US President Donald Trump.

WDJT-TV (Channel 58), where meteorologist Sam Kuffel had worked since 2019, has confirmed her departure but provided no official explanation in an internal memo to or public comments, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

While the station described the matter as a “personal issue,” Kuffel was reportedly dismissed one day after commenting on Musk’s gesture on her Instagram account.

The TV channel has removed Kuffel’s bio from its website and no longer mentions her in its weather section, but retains articles written by her. Her Instagram account has been set to private, but screenshots purportedly capturing her posts are available online. She has not commented publicly on the incident.

Before her tenure at WDJT-TV, the journalist worked at WAOW-TV (Channel 9) in Wausau, after graduating from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee with a degree in atmospheric science.

The Anti-Defamation League, a US-based pro-Israeli group which monitors anti-Semitism and hate speech, has described Musk’s gesture as “awkward” but did not say it was a Nazi salute. Similarly, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is the subject of an International Criminal Court warrant on charges related to genocide, has tweeted in support of the X owner, declaring him to be “a friend of Israel.”

Archive link

100 points
*

UN vote on combating glorification of nazism

permalink
report
reply
55 points

It’s that same fucking map again

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2022/11/09/why-france-and-51-other-countries-voted-against-the-un-resolution-condemning-nazism_6003471_8.html

TL:DR the countries who voted against did so to prevent Russia from using this vote as a justification for their invasion of Ukraine. Indeed they used the pretense of “removing Nazis” for their invasion.

These countries do not condone fascism (or at least officially. I’m looking at you, USA)

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

TL:DR the countries who voted against did so to prevent Russia from using this vote as a justification for their invasion of Ukraine. Indeed they used the pretense of “removing Nazis” for their invasion.

This doesn’t explain why the West has repeatedly voted against it for over a decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Damn that’s crazy that the country full of nazis and the fascist military industrial complex masquerading as a country arming them with billions of dollars worth of weapons would be the only two in the world to vote against the glorification of nazism. Totally wild. Oh and they vote against it every time, for years? Wow crazy wonder what’s up with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Russia is also full of Nazis, in case you forgot. In fact, most militaries have way too many Nazis, because they like to have an excuse to kill people.

I know where I’m posting this, and it’s likely going to be ignored at best, but you don’t get to just pretend like it’s only other people.

Here’s some information, but I recommend you also find more on your own, as an excercise:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism_in_Russia

Dmitry Valerievich Utkin, co-founder of the Wagner Group. Tattoos, for reference.

There’s plenty more to see. Nazis are a problem everywhere, and the authoritarian state of Russia certainly isn’t immune.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Defending nazism to own the russkies, what a great policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Denouncing nazis would embolden our enemies huh

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

to prevent Russia from using this vote as a justification for their invasion of Ukraine.

The UN has, on a few occasions, voted to sanctioned war as lawful and justified. The resolution to condemn Nazism is absolutely not that, and it is pure bullshit to claim it would be functionally the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

how’s this explain germany, which abstained?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Indeed they used the pretense of “removing Nazis”

Absolutely huge brained move to vote for the glorification of nazism in response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve never been good at reading stuff like this, so it’s more than plausible I’m just missing it, but I can’t find where the resolution would give anyone the legal power or moral authority to invade another state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Completely removing any credibility from the narrative that you like Nazis by checks notes voting against condemning Nazis.

Is that also the US’s justification for voting against this resolution every time it comes up, before or since?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hmm wonder who the two are…

I was expecting the US and Isreal but it ended up being Ukraine as the second one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

Garbage article, hiding behind the ADL, afraid to call him a nazi as well. Cowards who don’t call out nazi-ism are playing defense for the nazi’s. To the wall with the lots of them, good on Sam for not bowing to fascist authority.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It’s like when a todler is hiding behind a thin pole and everyone can still see them. The ADL can’t hide anything behind the phrase “awkward gesture.” Someone needs only ask, “What makes it awkward?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

There must be a better source for this news than RT.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

Would you expect western propaganda outlets to be more truthful on this?

Here’s a Yahoo article on it ig. There’s a bunch more too now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

That’s not “a Yahoo article”. Yahoo! News hosts articles from different sources, and this is from some shitty E-tier website called comingsoon.net.

Probably the best source for this currently is the HuffPost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Right so calling the guy who endorses and promotes Nazis on his website, who reuses Nazi rhetoric and who uses Nazis symbols on camera is reckless?

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

if i hear one more lib tell me that in USA you can freely say anything without repercussions as an argument…

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 124K

    Comments