The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what’s going on.

-40 points

I’m sure Musk is personally responsibly those things. I also heard he failed to clean bathrooms in this building.

I’m getting not liking him, but this blind brainless hate it’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I genuinely don’t get why people hate-follow these guys. If I don’t like someone I block them and move on. The last thing I want to do is talk about them all day every day with my friends and pat eachother on the back for being so smart ourselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yes, Musk is responsible because it was his decision to change the name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, if he decides on Sunday night that the logo will be changed on Monday morning and he’s not taking no for an answer, that leaves pretty little time and wiggle room for his employees to actually get permissions and stuff in time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

A bad CEO/Company owner trickles down to everything under them in the company. They pass major decisions or budgets (or lack thereof) that work their way down to everything if not immediately then over time. Toilets not getting cleaned probably comes down to people either not getting paid or being fired to avoid having to pay them, resulting in either no custodial staff or insufficient staff. There’s no way to defend him about this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
308 points
*

That man is repeatedly showing the world how stupid he actually is and how little he actually understands about running a company. He has never been in a situation like this where he wasn’t surrounded by a bunch of people playing babysitter and doing all the leg work to try to actually get his shit ideas to work. IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn’t even figured out what to call tweets and retweets, he really hadn’t thought any further than changing the logo and repeating the same lame idea he had 30 years ago.

ABAM (All Billionaires Are Morons)

permalink
report
reply
7 points

ABAM (All Billionaires Are Morons)

Bill Gates is actually a very smart, and nowadays even pleasant, man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

He has not always been pleasant. Don’t fall for the post-retirement PR spin

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He is the best billionaire. That may not be a high bar, but it’s something. If Elon Musk decided to retire and cure Malaria like Bill did (or maybe even just get back to space exploration or autonomous driving as he was doing before his Twitter craze, hopefully without fucking other people over?) I wouldn’t mind him as much

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ll take a horrible billionaire investing in malaria research over a manchild billionaire obsessed with naming everything X.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“Nowadays even pleasant” clearly implies he wasn’t always pleasant though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You do realise it was Bill Gates who made the creators of the Oxford Astra Zeneca Vaccine make it paid and keep the methods of producing it hidden? Their original plan was to make the methods of production public, so that Governments could set up their own labs to produce more of it and save lives. There were many deaths that could have been prevented if it wasn’t for this terrible human being.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think we need to read between the lines here.

I honestly think he’s intentionally driving Twitter into the ground. Thing is he can’t just fire everyone and shut down the servers or he won’t get the tax write-off. He’s burying Twitter in a way that maintains tax status. So in a way that’s smart, but also stupid he spent what he did only out of spite.

What he’s doing to Twitter is like a jumbo jet pilot that commits suicide by crashing the plane (that’s actually happened). Why do you need to take all those innocent people with you. Just go jump off a building, same end without killing a bunch of innocents.

Really his destruction of the platform is about control, he has some kind of personal beef with Twitter so he used his power and money to kill the whole thing. He’s taking his bat and ball and going home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
121 points

Or all billionaires are scum who have written the laws and ensured that the fine for this is no more than an annoyance and removing the sign without a permit was a worthwhile risk and the right call to make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

This guy gets it.

I think “all billionaires are scum” is perhaps too harsh, but it’s far closer to the truth than the views of society at large.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Too harsh? Can you name one that isn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

You cannot become a billionaire without being a scummy person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is actually hilarious. It didn’t occur to me that rebranding should also concern stuff like “tweets”, mostly because I’ve never used twitter, but I’m really looking forward to what he will come up with for those terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“X’s”

I’m not kidding

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn’t even figured out what to call tweets and retweets

Obviously Tweet -> Xeet 💩

permalink
report
parent
reply

Let me xeet that

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Using the sino-X, pronounced “Sh”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

…pronounced Faaht.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He has pretty much always been almost a caricature of a horrible boss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeets and Re-Yeets

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeets and re-Yeets actually make sense for outgoing messages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You need to have permits to change signs on your own building?

permalink
report
reply
60 points

It’s the heavy machinery required to do it that’s the problem. This is also not Elon Musk’s building, but a building Twitter rents. The building management company were the ones who called the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ah that explains. Didn’t know he was renting the building.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Companions like this very rarely own property. They rent space from the property management companies that bought the land and constructed the buildings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Most of those IT platform companies only rent their premises as it helps improve the balance sheet and quarterly results by moving “capital expenses” into “operational costs”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The way I heard it elsewhere (Google should help), Twitter/Elon actually had the necessary and correct permits (for using heavy machinery on the street/sidewalk and redirecting traffic around it).

Unfortunately, that detail was not correctly communicated to building security, who called the police believing there was no permit.

By the time the misunderstanding could be cleared up, the workers & heavy machinery had… “vacated premises” already, leaving the work in its half-finished state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have a source on that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-59 points

10 cars were broken into and 5 people were robbed while the police attended this matter. What a great deployment!

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Seems like a good place to remind people that the police do not prevent break-ins, robberies, or muggings. They just show up after-the-fact and do little to nothing to get people’s stuff back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The only thing you can count on a cop doing after a robbery is trying to convince the victim there’s no point in filing a report.

Because they know they won’t solve it, and if there’s no report there officially isn’t a case to count against them as unsolved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

There’s also the off chance they arrest you or shoot your dog

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Yeah, if I have to choose who is worse between Musk and Taylor Lorenz, 100% Taylor Lorenz takes the cake.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I’m not the person you’re replying to, but I do recall Lorenz being caught in a lie and trying to cover it with stealth-edits. She has definitely had her (and her publisher’s) agenda take precedent over facts back when she was covering the Depp/Heard trial.

However, while I do try to verify her reporting from other sources, I would not classify her anywhere near the imploding egomaniac billionaire. She’s way better than any billionaire, because there’s no way anyone can amass that amount of resources and not be selfish, problematic, and too far removed from ordinary people to relate to them.

/edited for grammar

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Okay, got it. I was like “…worse than literally right-wing, genocide supporting, actively shutting down leftist organization on Twitx Elon Musk???”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 42K

    Comments

Community moderators