23 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


U.S. District Judge David Hittner found Senate Bill 12 “impermissibly infringes on the First Amendment and chills free speech.” The struck-down law prohibited any performers from dancing suggestively or wearing certain prosthetics in front of children.

“It is not unreasonable to read SB 12 and conclude that activities such as cheerleading, dancing, live theater, and other common public occurrences could possibly become a civil or criminal violation.”

While SB 12 was originally billed as legislation that would prevent children from seeing drag shows, the final version did not directly reference people dressing as the opposite gender.

In Tuesday’s 56-page ruling, Hittner noted a survey of court decisions “reveals little divergence from the opinion that drag performances are expressive content that is afforded First Amendment protection.”

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk said that West Texas A&M University President Walter Wendler acted within his authority when he canceled a campus drag show.

“Today’s ruling is a celebration for the LGBTQ community and those who support free expression in the Lone Star State,” GLAAD President and Chief Executive Officer Sarah Kate Ellis.


The original article contains 796 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Bad bot. Summary references two federal trial level judges with different opinions, without explaining why there are two different trial level judges. I will read full article to see why there are two different judges on the same case. EDIT: not the same case. Summary omits context - different judges ruling differently in different cases concerning drag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

1A baybee

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Republicans: “No, not like that!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You mean the document doesn’t start (and end) on 2? Huh…

permalink
report
parent
reply
125 points
*

Critics sued the state, saying it violated the First Amendment.

And taxpayer dollars, which Republicans claim to be such responsible stewards of, are being wasted to defend lawsuits like this.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I assume republicans in Texas blame critics for forcing Texas to use taxpayer money to fight lawsuits

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s like arguing with a drunk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is correct. They actually do care about tax dollars being used to defend lawsuits when they could be used for more conservative things like buying bibles for public schools and funding beauty pageants for tots dressed entirely in ammunition

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

funding beauty pageants for tots dressed entirely in ammunition

Modern conservatives are the motivation for b-plots on Always Sunny. There’s gonna be a Franks Little Beauties 2, and they’ll obviously be dressed in ammo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Part of the reason I’m trying to move out of this shithole state. Tired of my money funding these hateful fucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

conservatism died a long time ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I mean, yeah. Their supporters see sexual and gender differences as degeneracy that will bring down civilization. Of course they support using tax money that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-77 points

I for one am fucking sick of hearing about this particular subject. Why is anyone talking about this?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

i am not an expert on the subject but i would imagine it’s because it has implications for the safety and legal rights of trans people. if they’re able to pass laws banning drag queens, they might then start (incorrectly) claiming that trans people are drag queens and thus those laws apply to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Exactly this.

Step 1) Declare that all drag performances are sexually explicit and therefore shouldn’t be allowed near kids. This is false, of course. There are plenty of PG or G rated drag shows where nothing even remotely explicit happens, but they need this lie to be enshrined into law.

Step 2) Declare that trans people, by existing, are “performing drag in public.” Again, false, but this would mean that trans people wouldn’t be allowed to be dressed in their preferred gender anywhere there might be kids. Even simply walking through the grocery store would be declared “sexually explicit behavior in the presence of children” and could result in criminal charges.

The right will stop at nothing to enforce their radical Christian views on the country and they don’t care whose lives they ruin to do this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not even just trans people… you know the end game of this kind of shit is to go back to a time where women don’t wear pants (because they legally can’t).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

They’re not banning drag queens, they’re banning sexually explicit drag shows for children. Drag shows are still 100% legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

They think all drag queens are sexually explicit and will enforce the law accordingly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

Nah, maybe just that it is fuckall business of government and they should concentrate on real issues instead of poking their nose into what clothes people wear?

permalink
report
parent
reply

That is the small government republicans are advocating for to bring back “freedom”. Aka enslave poor people, protect richt criminals and tell people what they can and cannot wear. God forbid money being spent on education, healthcare or infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yes. That’s literally the issue being discussed here that you seem to think is “too boring”. You agree with the general sentiment here. Who are you mad at?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Are you child? If not, it doesn’t affect your rights, as this law applies to children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

You keep hearing about the GOP vilifying and persecuting LGBTQ+ people because it’s against the supposed ideals of the country and the GOP keep doing it. If you want news about LGBTQ+ issues to stop, you need to make the GOP stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

You are being distracted. Focus. You CAN eat your local representative. One bite at a time.

People don’t need to know what is in the chilli at the cookout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Innocent people being villified, persecuted, attacked and oppressed isn’t just a “distraction”, it’s a serious problem that’s heading towards genocide.

We can chew bubble gum and walk at the same time, by which I mean deal with this AND their other fuckery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Ugh, this isn’t a fucking joke, this is people’s lives. You’re allowed to focus on more than one thing too, btw

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I don’t know. You’re the one that clicked on the discussion thread. Seems silly to click a link for a discussion on a topic you’re bored of. Maybe just keep scrolling next time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

1A issues are important. I’m just sick of misleading or lying headlines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Because republicans keep violating the constitution and trying to marginalize anyone who isn’t white hetero Christian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

funny how people here suddenly care about the constitution when it comes to showing children sexually explicit material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because keeping us fighting over this keeps us from going after billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We have a winner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Then read something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Because your apathy doesn’t negate the attacks that marginalized people are facing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re telling people to back down from fighting back against persecution? Looking like a target, bruh

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This was never a problem until Republicans tried to start banning it. So that’s why people are talking about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Because people like you keep trying to raise the suicide rate of an already alarming high rate among the group.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Ya think?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 479K

    Comments