Yeah! Just because a racist, fascist douchebag does a seig heil doesn’t mean you should tell obvious big mean old lies about him being a Nazi!

You tell those woke mind virus victims, Joe!

24 points
*

I wanna see a cage match between Joe Rogan and Alex Jones where they beat the hell out of each other while debating screaming incoherently.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I mean, Rogan does have a black belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. He’d pulverize ol’ beet-faced Jones. Jones just kind of always looks like he’s ready to have a heart attack in the next five minutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’d still be worth watching him grind Jones down into pieces that’d fit through a fine sieve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It would temporarily redeem him. Temporarily. Until he opened his mouth again.

permalink
report
parent
reply

But they wouldn’t actually fight. They’d just agree with each other and then jack each other off. No-one wants to see that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lol. They’d look like two micro-penises flopping around on the ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

Keep doubling down, you fucking jackasses. Rest of the world is watching.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Key word is “watching”. They’re more than happy to have an audience as long as they get what they want. And they do and they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I wish you were wrong, but I guess “You’re up, mario”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I was kinda hoping that Joe would call it what it was. Not that I care about his opinion but to at least prove he is still somewhat independent.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

He’s the Sanewasher General.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why would you hold such hopes? Seriously, I have you tagged as “REALLY GOOD AT CUTTING THROUGH THE CRAP,” and Rogan has been all-crap for soooo long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well I don’t really follow Rogan, but I’ve seen and heard snippets here and there and he always struck me as at least honest. A lot of the (rightfully)shit he gets from liberals is because he doesn’t push people when they say downright incorrect things in his program. But I get why he does that, if he started doing that people would stop going to his show, no one wants to be put in an uncomfortable position especially if you’re not being paid.

But it seem’s that now he’s just fully down with the agenda, which I did not expect to happen so fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

Nazi sympathizer = Nazi

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Joe Rogan is such a disappointment. Dude lost his mind during COVID.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Hey hey now - let’s not forget that he got famous in the first place on the garbage pile that was fear factor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And the so-called Man Show with that other shitheel

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

That was Kimmel and Carolla. I don’t think Joe was on that.

Never mind, he was. But long after I had stopped watching it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Hey, you can badmouth Rogan all you want, but you do not badmouth my man Doug Stanhope.

Despite their doing that show together, he’s about as anti-Rogan as you can get.

Everyone makes mistakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Must we forget about the fantastic News Radio that quickly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He took a side and knoew what he was doing when he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Dude used to openly endorse Bernie sanders and defended him vehemently on his podcast. He also laid the smack down on Candace Owens about climate change and owned Jordan Peterson on his stupid views about equality of outcome. He also called Steven Crowder a bitch to his face. He is a far cry from that man now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 563K

    Comments