214 points

It’s impressive how hard these people lick boots.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

But also how shameless they are, doing it in full public view

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

And the gargling too

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

And the gagging also

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
131 points

Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

permalink
report
reply
114 points

I don’t think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

That’s what the Trump regime wants us to think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Laws only apply if they are enforced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points
*

It’s sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they’ve somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says “No” to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it’ll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they’re pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that’s exactly what they want us to do… They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn’t. And that’s where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we’re nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If you aren’t willing to kill them then they will inch forward until they win. That is why civil wars have existed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

There are only two tried and true methods I am aware of to stop fascists:

  1. Killing them
  2. Making them kill themselves

I’m going to enjoy seeing this comment get removed. I’ll think about it as I’m put on the train to the death camp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Trump is the candidate during next election

Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

He wins enough red States to have a majority

They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This.

We need to stop acting like the norms matter at all, like the rules still apply. We must treat this like what it is: a threat to our very survival.

The US government, at least the parts that actually could do something about this, are on the brink of total collapse or dismantlement. I hate to say it but I think the time for peaceful resistance is long since past, i don’t see any way this is going to end without bloodshed

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The only effective short-term roadblocks are going to be legal challenges, like the ones WA’s governor and AG have been preparing for. You’re right that this only works until it gets overturned by SCOTUS, and it doubly hurts progressives because we now have to spend resources (time and money) fighting nonsense instead of fighting for causes we want…like some goddamn healthcare.

Delay. Deny. Depose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s already an injunction against one of his orders. I’m sure more will come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unfortunately those are only for the states that filed suit against it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The Night of the Long Knives would like to have a word with you

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

It’s cute how so many in the comments think the legal checks will prevent this. They don’t care about the law or the Constitution in the same way they don’t care about optics, hypocrisy, decorum, or process. People keep viewing this through the lense of American democracy. None of that matters to fascists.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Yeah, people don’t seem to truly understand this, and I fear it will take something extreme before they do… And it’s likely already too late now, let alone by then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They care about the law the same way the nazi’s cared about the law until the night of the long knives. I suspect their mass deportation plan is really them gearing up for the night of the long knives 2.0.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Night of broken glass comes first.

Wait for them to loot and pillage “immigrant” owned businesses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We do not call it Reichskristallnacht anymore. We call it Novemberprogrome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

After four years of them being in power, he’ll probably just be able to…not leave, regardless of any election. Who would stop him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Presumably someone with better aim than the last shooter.

I’d be very careful as a wannabe dictator in a land with this many guns. The next four years are going to be tense for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Trump even said he shouldn’t have left in 2020. So think that is the plan already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The constitution says he’s no longer president Jan 20.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The Constitution is just a piece of paper unless someone enforces it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In the end, the country isn’t a democracy. It’s a complicated system with complicated interactions.

It’s really not impossible that a democracy turns into fascism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thought about that regarding the current events in Germany. If people democratically vote for fascism, that’s still a democratic vote. Only the outcome might be less democratic (or not at all) but at least once people choose this path willingly, following democratic rules.

At the end it’s perfectly legal to do this. The question is more if it’s good or bad. It maybe even stupid. But here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But then we would not be a democracy and being a democracy is written into the constitution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I can’t like this comment enough!!! When will we learn they DON’T PLAY BY THE RULES. If the magats want this to pass, they will manipulate, intimidate, bend, or break the rules to do it. This is how coups happen. They don’t sit down and ask nicely, they just DO IT and back it up with military force if they have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They care so little they’re trying to get an amendment passed… wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

“It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

permalink
report
reply
84 points

In order for it to pass, they need 290 votes in the House. The Republicans currently have 220 votes, so they would need 70 Democrats to flip.

Then it goes to the Senate where they need 67 votes. First, 60 to get past the inevitable filibuster, and with 53 votes, Republicans need 7 Democrats to flip to move it forward and 14 to pass it.

Then, the fun part, they need 38 states to ratify it. Trump did win 31 states, so he would still need 7 Harris states to ratify an amendment.

permalink
report
reply
82 points
*

Nah. They’re just gonna say “whachu gonna do about it” as he sits in the office for the third time. Or the richest men in the world backing the regime will just bri lobby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

@HasturInYellow And the one behind him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Oh, but that would lack decorum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This is going to be the only answer, I’m afraid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Watch yourself. SCOTUS says he can legally have seal team 6 come to your house and kill you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Don’t forget, he’ll sit in his office with his private army of proud boys surrounding him after he pre pardons them for shooting anyone who dares approach their precious leader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This thread is reminding me of the movie Civil War that I watched recently

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. He already tried that once, he’ll fucking do it again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol cute.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 509K

    Comments