“CPS will continue to protect our students and their families in alignment with the Illinois TRUST Act and Chicago’s Welcoming City Ordinance,” one school official said.

Chicago Teachers Union President Stacy Davis Gates called the situation “unprecedented” at a news conference Friday afternoon.

227 points

Good fucking job faculty and staff. This is critically important.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Yeah, but this is surely also to intimidate folks from sending the to public schools.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Oh 100% - that’s why clearly rejecting it is so important. If the folks at your local school clearly announce “we don’t fuck with Trump’s terrorism bullshit” then it makes it less likely that parents (even those with residency or citizenship) will be afraid to let their kids attend.

I think the whole announcement that the admin will raid schools is a pretty transparent attempt to make non-white people voluntarily stop sending their kids to school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

CPS has a very hard headed teachers union that people often complain about. But in times like this, it’s exactly what’s needed. I can’t imagine the for profit “Disney II” charter school up the street to have the same approach 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For-profit? They’ll rat you out for a nickel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Who the fuck works at ICE and thinks the new policies are ok?

permalink
report
reply
116 points

You don’t work at ICE and not be a racist authoritarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah well. You’re probably right. I mean they’re basically speical cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-54 points

That’s overly reductive. There are people working at ICE because they see how racist and authoritarian it is and they want to be part of changing that system.

I’ll happily admit that ICE is pretty fucking attractive to racist authoritatians but leaning too far into generalizations will give you a very black and white view of the world that doesn’t reflect reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

There are also people that work for the police because they want to positively change their community. There’s a reason that ACAB is still true, despite that fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Nope. ICE it’s a byproduct of 9/11, and is racism and xenophobia wrapped in a burning flag of patriotism.

F U C K
ICE

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m married to someone who was on a green card for a long time. Believe me when I say that in over 90% of our encounters with ICE, we were treated with arrogance and hostility. And she’s a hardworking professional who toes the line and complies with every rule, and her case couldn’t have been simple: spouse of a native-born American. It didn’t matter to those swine. They were there because they know they could bully people who couldn’t answer back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“Guys, some people just joined the Nazis because they wanted them to be less racist! You can’t just say all Nazis are racist!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

You know how people get jaded at work towards customers at jobs like stores and support centers? I bet the jaded people at ICE are real fun to be around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Probably a decent chunk… but the more dangerous portion is those who legitimately believe in the system. Under a normal administration we’d rightfully object to a public servant that refused to carry out their duties.

If a Dem had just won and said “We’re going to make sure asylum seekers are all given temporary accommodations in motels until we can process them” and some conservation asshat said “Yer nuh muh presuden” and simply refused to carry out the order we’d rightfully be pissed off that some individual administrator was trying to singlehandedly undermine the electoral will.

This is a fucking complex situation because most people working in government have an understanding of this (which is normally good) and just want to make the implementation of policies that they may not fully agree with as efficient and kind as possible.

Much like MLK’s sentiment, the majority of atrocities carried out under the Trump admin will be done by relatively unobjectionable people who are just trying to locally minimize harm. Someone liberal might stay in ICE and comply with these orders because they believe they can take small actions to make the implementation of school raids less cruel and, genuinely, they’re probably right.

We’re in a weird fucking situation and we’re all about to learn how we’d have acted if we lived in 1930s Germany. Will we be the cruel ideologue who actively causes harm? Will we resign in protest and become essentially irrelevant? Will we try to work within the system to prevent small cruelties while supporting large cruelties (i.e. Schindler)? Will we apathetically continue to support the economic system of cruelty? Etc…

This is going to be a cruel four years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

We’re in a weird fucking situation and we’re all about to learn how we’d have acted if we lived in 1930s Germany. Will we be the cruel ideologue who actively causes harm? Will we resign in protest and become essentially irrelevant? Will we try to work within the system to prevent small cruelties while supporting large cruelties (i.e. Schindler)? Will we apathetically continue to support the economic system of cruelty? Etc…

You’re right. The best thing to do, though, is resist. Simple disobedience will slow their plans. There’s so much power in simply not cooperating and being a nuisance. If you haven’t read it already, the OSS (precursor to the CIA) has a great guide in simple sabotage for everyday people (Simple Sabotage Field Manual) that when done can stymie them. This was written back in the '40s during WWII to help occupied countries resist.

And I agree that there are some people in ICE trying to lessen harm. To that, I say that we should find them and support them and give them whatever aid. That goes for anyone who works in the federal government. A low level person at State can “accidentally” approve changes to trans people’s documents. An office worker at DoE can ask annoying questions and derail meetings. It’s little acts of sabotage that when added up can bring this to a screeching halt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yooo. For real.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

It was the secret service, not ICE:

The U.S. Secret Service told the I-Team they approached a South Side school Friday. Chicago Public Schools officials had initially said the agents were from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

But nonetheless, the school took the correct and appropriate action.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

The headline has been updated:

US Secret Service approached South Side school, not ICE agents: officials

The U.S. Secret Service told the I-Team they approached a South Side school Friday. Chicago Public Schools officials had initially said the agent or agents were from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Secret Service said they were investigating a threat, and responded to a house. They said they were then told the person they wanted to talk to was at Hamline Elementary School, but they did not enter the school, the Secret Service told the I-Team.

The threat the Secret Service was investigating was not immediately clear.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

What kind of threat would the Secret Service be investigating at a random house in Chicago? Like, maybe if someone sent out a death threat to an elected official, but even then isn’t that the FBI or local cops jobs?

Also, a public school turning away the secret service when they say they’re investigating a threat just seems incredibly unlikely.

Also also, how in the world would the school have mistaken secret service agents for ICE agents? Did these agents not identify themselves?

I think the answer to all of these questions is going to be “the Secret Service is lying their ass off because everyone in the executive branch knows Trump will throw a giant hissy for if he hears that his big mean ICE agents got scared of by a bunch of public school teachers,” but I guess we’ll see what happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

My family did have the Secret Service show up at the house one time. I don’t recommend it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Fair enough, looking at some news stories about past death threat incidents it does seem like there’s been a number of times where they do arrests and interrogations themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

What kind of threat would the Secret Service be investigating at a random house in Chicago?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t the Obamas from Chicago? Is it possible that they were investigating a threat against the Obamas or a site that a suspect believes is linked to the Obamas?

Trump’s MAGA crew are right now running a victory lap, so it’s not out of the realm of possibilities that at least one nutjob has declared open season on Obama or something. And after the two attempted Trump assassinations, I don’t think they’re going to want to look like they dropped the ball a third time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That was my first thought too.

Although it’s also possible some edgy teen made a comment online from a Chicago School computer. And by comment I mean threat worth investigating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

All questions I have zero answers to, but am also curious about.

I would guess the agents said “We are federal agents”, and since there has been all this talk of ICE and Chicago, made an assumption.

The secret service might be investigating a threat to a family member of someone they are protecting.

There are plenty of plausible answers, but we definitely don’t know the full story yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, most of this seems plausible, except

I would guess the agents said “We are federal agents”

That doesn’t sound right to me at all, cops don’t say “Hi I’m with the government” they’re always “This is FBI Agent Smith” or “I’m with Immigration and Customs Enforcement” or “I’m calling to speak to you about an official IRS investigation.” I don’t understand how “federal agents” is even in their lexicon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

America already went back 50 years in one week. Gonna be a helluva 4 years.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 501K

    Comments