18 points

My first total solar eclipse. It was truly breath taking. I’ve seen another one since then but the first one was truly special.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It’s wild.

Air changing, animals responding. Shit must have been transcendental in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I caught the 2009 total eclipse here and it was awe-inspiring. It was also the longest solar eclipse expected for the 21st century at 6 minutes, 39 seconds, so it made a deep impression on everybody standing on the roof of the apartment block to watch it.

I don’t wish to see a second, though, because the next one will be in the year 2200 and that would mean I’d still be alive in 200 years. Not something I want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, I gotta say that seeing a Monet in person wrecked my brain.

But my favorite painter is van Gogh, which I guess is pretty fucking common; and my favorite sculptor is Rodin. I’ve never seen anything of theirs in person.

I don’t know if it would have that same consciousness altering effect because I’ve not only already been exposed to art, but art like theirs, and even reproductions of them. But I sure as fuck wish I could travel and find out.

It’s one of those curses where I could never afford to take off of work to see them, even if they’d been close enough I could afford to get there. Now that I’m disabled, I have the time, but even less money. But, even if I saved, I can’t really travel far at all. Even a day’s drive is murder that takes days to recover from.

I keep my eye out, though. I hope one of the museums I can reach will have access, or something like that.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

DC has a lot of Monet’s and it’s free to see them if you’re in the US.

What about them blew your mind? I thought they were pretty but didn’t have the same experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s where I saw my first one :)

I grew up fairly unexposed to art that wasn’t of a fairly generic sort. Essentially stuff that was purely representational. Pictures of birds, hunting scenes, that kind of thing.

Monet, or at least the one I saw that made the school group I was with late because I was literally just standing there and gaping for a half hour, it was like looking at the world through a new pair of glasses after years of not knowing you needed them. Not because it was made things sharp, it was that he captured the beauty of things in a way I didn’t even know was possible.

It was so alive. There was so much movement and texture. It reminded me of when I would walk through the woods alone, everything unfolding around me in this riot of color and beauty as I discovered the next gap in the trees and stepped into a meadow.

It felt real in a way that photography couldn’t, that the more realistic painters couldn’t. Every inch I looked at unfolded another layer of the experience. Yes, it looked like the place, but it was more like being in that place than anything I’d ever seen before.

The fact that someone could transport me like that, and do it in such a seemingly impossible way was magical. This wasn’t art like in comic books, or on office walls, it was life, captured in this rippling, vibrant explosion of paint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

There are actually quite a few casts of Rodin’s famous The Thinker statue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Thinker_sculptures including Cleveland, Louisville, Detroit, NYC, Washington DC, and San Francisco.

A bunch more “later casts” further down the above wikipedia page.

There’s probably one near you.

Other Rodin pieces usually accompany The Thinker in museums.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Seeing aurora borealis on new years eve.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I want to see Cats, on stage, live, again.

Re-visit some places. Prague, Tartu, Kyoto come to mind.

And I would kind of like that “new love” feeling again, except it would either get messy or be preceded by unpleasantness or tragedy.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

The ‘golden needle’ penetrated the veil of my mind. This is a term for a brief moment of enlightenment.

I once solved a Zen koan and experienced just such a moment. It was a spiritual, emotional, and physiological experience.

———
A koan is a zen riddle which can’t be solved by logic. Probably the most famous example is ‘what is the sound of one hand clapping’.

permalink
report
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 719

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments