My partner and I were discussing this over dinner, our ideas went from buying up land to finance organic farming and distributing it at the lowest price to crashing the financial system to “reset” everybody’s bank account with no possible recovery. Any other ideas?

68 points

buy politians to make them make laws to fuck over bilionaries, what is ironic lol

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I feel like this is the only answer that would make a difference long-term.

The other suggestions like giving people food and housing would only be putting a bandaid on a broken system; it needs to actually change to prevent the same situations from reoccurring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You might be underestimating how little 100 billion is, compared to the wealth of other billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

With the pennies they actually pay lawmakers, though? 100 billion could go a loooooooooong fucking way to outspend the billionaires.

The reason they’re billionaires is because they’re fuckin misers and penny-pinchers. They hate spending money and that is evidenced by how cheaply our politicians are bought for.

Simply outspend them quickly, and you’ll have the politicians licking your boots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This one crossed our mind as well, the problem is you usually don’t compete against billionaires but rather against corporations or conglomerate which has much more economic power that single individuals. You also have to account for the benefits that these private entities can promise (knowing a law will favor a certain industry is a good way to make cash by buying stocks before said law passes), that’s quite hard to compete with that when you’re a philanthropist

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

100 billion puts you in the top 15 richest on the planet. You’d actually rank #11 ahead of Sergey Brin and Bloomberg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s the publicly known list. There are many billionaires out there whose asset values are intentionally obfuscated so that they can remain below the radar (particularly offshore holdings), and there are known cases of people suing to stay off the billionaires list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This. It’s called “legislative capture” and corporates do it all the time.

I would set up a massive lucrative company and lobby the hell out of governments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

I am surprised nobody said ‘education’. Every dollar spent there generates two dollars of worth. Educated people have fewer children and pollute less. Educated people don’t vote as many morons into power. I sincerely believe many problems of the world could have been prevented with educating everyone involved.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Education, specifically primary and secondary education for girls, is highly effective at reducing poverty. It deserves be highly prioritized for investment.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_education

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True. Also sex ed and ‘life education’ like spending advice or household tips for people who struggle to live alone. I’d probably have a board of various teachers advising me on where to spend how much and track the results with studies to be able to correct course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Depends what areas of education you mean. I think the most important areas people need to know more about in order to better the world as a whole are literacy, numeracy and world issues (war, current politics, climate change, etc).

Spending $100B to make university free would just accelerate a new problem that the world is facing: overeducation. Now it’s harder to get a job without a college degree as a minimum, especially above minimum wage, even though the skills gained in the degree are not what is actually in demand or being used in whatever job someone ends up with.

Granted that’s mainly a problem in the USA at the moment, and with $100B you could also fund a lot of R&D so people studying STEM end up in STEM jobs bettering the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It needs to be heavily targeted towards mandatory education, particularly K-12 or equivalents, and have a strong focus on critical thinking, scientific skepticism, technical literacy, entrepreneurialism, and the methods and models of social programming that are commonly used (how to identify, resist and avoid them).

This will help create generational change which is great for the future, but sadly does nothing to solve the pressing issues we face right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think education on this level even for adults, especially in ‘third world’ countries, would help alleviate some issues we face today very quickly over the course of a few years.

Why entrepeneurialism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed. Education does not = academia. I’d argue that right now the incentives for academia for the sake of academia is far higher than for education and learning. There’s something systematic there. I can’t tell where $100B would be the most effective but getting 20 years olds MBAs ain’t it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Very true…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

I’d buy Facebook and rebrand it as V.

Pretty sure that would kill it.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Gonna need a couple hundred billion more for that :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d do this and then turn it into a socialist hell hole where I censor everything that looks like it came from Storm Front. And when conservatives birch and moan for rhetoric that is Storm Front lite, I’ll remind them that the platform is private and duck their feelings

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

immediately going hard authoritarianism against individuals. Hitler would be proud. Read some sociological theory please. If you want to nationalize all corporations, you are on the right path. But if you want to immediately go “big brother” it shows you are just a petty tyrant who would probably be even worse then our existing society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Hire hitmen to remove the other 100 richest people in the 🌎.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

This is a great answer. But you have to realize, “hitmen” cannot operate autonomously. You would need to fund them, create a private investigative network, etc etc so that you could hunt down other billionaires. basically, you have to get your hands dirty if you want this to work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So… Not to techbro this, but can we crowdfund this and accidentally reinvent the revolution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Unfortunately unless you introduced some kind of sci-fi “keep what you kill” culture like in Chronicals of Riddick, no. Revolution is expensive, and those that have money are absolutely not interested in that nonsense. Ultimately if you want a revolution, it had to happen without an individual profit motive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a good start but then their wealth just transfers to their next of whatever. Hire hitmen after and during investing in creating political changes that ensure wealth is more fairly distributed through society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Create a fund and use the dividends to fund free healthcare. Rather than spend it all in one go, I want it to continue generating a stable fund to keep things going.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Ewwwwww! You want us to get Pensions you filthy commie!?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Pension_Fund_of_Norway

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.7K

    Posts

  • 310K

    Comments