It’s open source. Apparently folks have already made mods of it that add CCP-sensitive info back in. Disclaimer: I have yet to see this for myself.
The answer I got out of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B-abliterate.i1-Q4_K_S
Seems like the model you mentioned is more like a fine tuned Llama?
Specifically, these are fine-tuned versions of Qwen and Llama, on a dataset of 800k samples generated by DeepSeek R1.
Yeah, it’s distilled from deepseek and abliterated. The non-abliterated ones give you the same responses as Deepseek R1.
just running it locally, apparently. The output of this model is being filtered by another AI, but only on the public-hosted copy.
A government censoring things that make them look bad?!? Thank goodness there is none of that in America.
It’s a useful tool in propaganda to set all focus on the injustices of our enemies and thus never contemplate the injustices of our own. Over there it’s a problem, here it’s well you know, understandable.
The biases in your sources of information that you know about are infinetly better than the ones you don’t know about.
Aren’t you aware of Chinese bias? Not a post about china goes by without some reference to Whinnie the pooh and censorship.
Perhaps deep seek is better because people seem to be unaware of our own biases?
Yes, I’m aware. That’s also why I am against the Tiktok ban. Everyone knows about the censorship. I’m more afraid of the media ecosystem being tampered with.
Perhaps deep seek is better because people seem to be unaware of our own biases?
Wat?
Are people forgetting that there is a list of names that chatgpt can’t talk about?
In this case, I believe the screenshot is depicting DeepSeek (made by China, which vehemently denies the massacre at Tiananmen square) as whitewashing history.
I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download?
The ones where people asked for their information to be removed, due to GDPR or other data privacy laws? Sure does seem like a different situation to me
You think the all mighty and kind CCP is up to something‽
Site ban from .ml
