I want to hear you reasons, why do you think that.
During the first cold war conflicts happened outside of the super-powers:
- Vietnam ๐ป๐ณ and North-Korea ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ท
This time conflicts will happen in Siberia, Africa and Middle east. I also think Indonesia and Pakistan will be center of major conflicts between China, India and the USA. These conflicts will costs some millions of lives, but not touch the empires heartlands, so it will not get nuclear again imo.
Demographics will play a major role in this: Younger median age countries will have more war and conflict, while the older countries can maintain some semblance of stability. South Sudan is a great example of this mechanism: This is why I also think this war will last 30 years, like the 30 years war in Germany 1618 that killed 50%+ of its populaiton.
I think weโre going through Cold War 2 before World War 3. China and Russia have been testing krill fishing limits recently while American private equity has entered the field, and the TikTok showdown is testing Internet authority.
America will take Greenland, and then Canada is next being surrounded on three sides.
Can a NATO country invoke the defence pact if itโs attacked by another NATO country?
NATO vs America wasnโt on my bingo card.
The class war never stopped.
I think sort of, although it wonโt be as cut-and-dry and the first two. I think itโll be somewhere between a traditional โhotโ war and a cold war, where the larger players (ie: China, the US, Russia, the EU) will engage in propaganda wars, attempts to destabilize each other, cyber attacks, trade wars etc. while in areas outside of those groups (eg: Ukraine currently) there will be physical wars fought by proxy between the bigger groups.
I think weโre seeing the start of it now, and IMO the US is probably doing the least well so far of the major groups. Russia is doing the destabilization thing, which is working quite well in Europe and spectacularly well in the US, China seems to be leading in trade and tech (both cyber attacking and just undermining the US tech sector with things like DeepSeek) and I think Europeโs strategy seems to be to just bunker down and see what happens.
I think the main advantage the US traditionally has always had is its military - itโs geared up very well for a big physical war, but I donโt think this is that kind of conflict. And with the Trump administrationโs obsession with tariffs and the general disregard for education and soft power, I think the country is really heading in the wrong direction for what may be coming.