Where minority?
But instead of just killing you, he gives you a long speech about how you made the right choice for the economy first, prolonging your torture.
although i agree with the sentiment, i think a key part for this to work is missing, and thats the scale. the only reason the liberal gives the gun to the facist, is cause the bourgeoisie spend a lot of money on propaganda, making the liberals more scared of the left, and less scared of the right. if it’s only 4 people there’s a big chance these delusions (among others) planted in the liberal brains by the bourgeisie/facists will not be strong enough, and there will be another outcome Id like to imagine here the liberal pisses themselves and probably does nothing, since they have to make actual meaningful decisions on their own for once, and cant just roll along with whatever wind is blowing
Right answer would be to kill the fascist & shoot himself
Clearly the fascist would only kill the anarchist and liberal because the Marxist is the same as him but just Red Fash, right?
Actually if history is anything to go by the liberal gives the gun to the fascist and the Marxist wrestles it away from the fascist, it goes off in the struggle shooting the liberal in the leg. The liberal screams and blames the marxist for this. The marxist manages to beat the fascist into submission, but the gun slides across the floor toward the liberal who picks it up and shoots the anarchist. Then the Liberal and Marxist spend the rest of their lives hating eachother, and the liberal also brings the fascist to the hospital and tells the cops the Marxist is the one who shot the anarchist, and their leg.
