LOL

152 points

So the same people who have no problem about using other people’s copyrighted work, are now crying when the Chinese do the same to them? Find me a nano-scale violin so I can play a really sad song.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

That’s obviously a cello.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Maybe a cello if it was human grade. But that’s tartigrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Pedant time: That’s microscale not nanoscale.

You can shoot me now, it’s deserved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Can you put a liuqin in there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Planck could not scale small enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You more elegantly said what I came to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Bruh, these guys trained their own AI on so called “puplicly available” content. Except it was, and still is, completely without consent from, or compensation to said artists/bloggers/creators etc… Don’t throw rocks when you live in a glass house 🤌

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Another reason why I use Andi, because it don¡t gut copyright content to the own knowledge base, it’s is a search assistant, not a chatbot like others, it search by the concept and give a direct answer to your question, listing also the links of the sources and pages where it found the answers. It’s LLM is only made to “understand” (to call it something) your question to search pages que contain information about it and to understand the content to be capable to summarize it. There isn’t third party or copyright content in the LLM. It’s knowledge is real time web content like any other search engine. Even in it’s (reduced) chat capabilities, always show the sources where it found it’s answers.

Traditional search works with keywords, listing thousends of pages where appears this keyword, that means that 99% of the list has nothing to do with what you are looking for, this is the reason why AI searches give a better result, but not Chatbots, which search the answers in a own knowledge base and invent answers if not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

Stealing from thieves is not theft

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*

Yes it is. Although I personally have far less moral objections to it.

To elaborate:
OpenAI scraped data without permission, and then makes money from it.

Deepseek then used that data (even paid openai for it), trained a model on that data, and then releases that model for anyone to use.

While it’s still making use of “stolen data” (that’s a whole semantics discussion I won’t get into right now), I find it far more noble than the former.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Came to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable.

It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Oh are we supposed to care about substantial evidence of theft now? Because there’s a few artists, writers, and other creatives that would like to have a word with you…

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Open AI stole all of our data to train their model. If this is true, no sympathy.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

That is what I mean, it’s a difference between an AI with robbed content in its knowledge/lenguage base and an AI assistant which only search iformation in the web to answer, linking to the corresponding pages. Way more intelligent and ethic use of an AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 43K

    Comments

Community moderators