it’s not hate, it’s human rights and history.
q: what does that word mean?
a: a fear or dislike of China, or its people or culture
if there was space, i would include:
Gaza genocide under apartheid Israel supported by US funds and weaponry … Discussion of this genocide is being actively repressed through student visa revocation, anti-BDS laws and more. (Likewise to the post, being pro-Palestine is NOT antisemitism.)
more reading:
Wikipedia: List of United States atrocity crimes
Wikipedia: Native American genocide in the US
Wikipedia: Persecution of Uyghurs in China
locking this while we get a handle on things -_-
Is it allowed though?
Or is it allowed as long as it doesn’t affect the interests of the ruling class?
I wouldn’t say we’re not censoring the indigenous genocide. Having worked in education as a researcher, I’d say most K-12 programs actively avoid the topic (in large part because textbooks tend to get approved first by Texas, then others follow–long story as to why. But suffice to say they don’t exactly like the dirty truth in Texas).
I guess that’s not censorship so much as indoctrinating the youth? Is that really better?
Is this a modern (past 20-30 years) trend, or did I just get insanely lucky with my school teaching us about stuff like the Trail of Tears as a kid?
So the thing is this is mostly a matter of which texts your school purchases. Since the leader in purchasing (at least when I checked a few years back) was Texas’ board, publishers tend to prioritize what they require. There are usually alternatives and teachers have (or had?) some autonomy on this, but many are pretty neutral because why would you go out of your way to research these things?
Anyway, currently we also have an abundance of book banning and the politicalizarion of the PTA so it’s probably even worse right now. Also, Trail of Tears is like the token indigenous atrocity story, kind of like how a text will have 3 paragraphs on MLK to cover all of the civil rights movement.
fully agree! take my upvote for exposure and apologies for not having quite enough room in the meme for the full nuance :)
Who said “hilighting” censorship is Sinophobia? This feels like a strawman. Unless you’re trying to lecture tankies I guess
I see it from posters from ml domains regularly. Hell I was basically told China isn’t oppressing the Uyghurs yesterday. They’re just all at happy fun camp and don’t want to talk to their killjoy families. All the media with families speaking out. Regardless of where it originates from. All made up by the CIA and anyone who covers it simply isn’t credible somehow. The YouTube maker from mainland China that I used to enjoy watching. Who had to abandon her career after telling her life story. Due to threats from the Chinese government . Which included her having to live as a boy because of China’s sexist one child policy. And who’s partner a transgender Uyghur. They don’t exist. I just imagined that they existed. And if they are being threatened by the government they deserve it. It’s got nothing to do with the government being bad. You should expect brain rot from ml enclaves
Those people are idiots but again, that’s not about just (or even mostly) censorship. It’s about a lot more
this user said literally that in my last post: https://lemmy.selfhostcat.com/comment/147777 (and yeah they probably fit the bill of tankie)
(please reconsider your “strawman” judgement in light of this information; i’m trying to keep the comments from getting derailed and locked like last time 😊)
There is a lot more going on in that post than just highlighting censorship