The Senate passed a resolution Wednesday to make business attire a requirement on the Senate floor.

The moves comes after backlash to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) directive to scuttle the chamber’s informal dress code, which was widely viewed to be inspired by Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.).

The bipartisan resolution requires that business attire be worn on the floor of the Senate, “which for men shall include a coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants.”

The bill does not spell out what the attire includes for women.

1 point

See, even the Senate can’t function without basic regulations. Just because we used to have freedom and decorum for generations, what makes people think an entire society should continue to be free of restriction and regulation? If individuals operate outside the established norms of a community, legislation is adopted to codify those norms.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

The Senate was nonfunctional because someone wore shorts? I’m no ancap but I don’t think that this fixed a problem, nonetheless the problem with the Senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

It seems my exaggerated commentary is a bit above your head. Sorry for attempting to use the internet to spur thought and discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There is a bigmad Trump supporter downvoting the thread, I’m guessing most of us have them blocked already.

Everyone point & laugh at the stupid fascist symp.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I did notice a comment I couldn’t open to read for some reason, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This is going to help avert a Government shutdown and put millions of people out of work!

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I absolutely hate to defend the Senate on anything, but there’s really nothing they can do about the shutdown at this point. They’re ready to fund the government. The House isn’t playing ball.

permalink
report
parent
reply
139 points

Yes, let’s enforce a classist dress code to remind everyone how classist we are. That’ll fix everything.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

It’s the Senate, it’s intended to be the “upper class.”

The rabble is supposed to be in the House of Representatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

It certainly makes it more likely for the rich to be able to go to the senate. Especially if you’re an especially big and tall guy like Fetterman who would have to get all of his suits tailor-made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Only if you want them to fit. I saw no requirement for that in the memo

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bingo bango. High-waters, hoooo!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d laugh my ass off if Fetterman shows up next time in a jacket that barely reaches his elbows

Bonus points if some other Senator walks in looking like a Dick Tracy villain

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Yeah it’s basically an attempt to be like the House of Lords in a country without nobility

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Attempt? That was the original intent. They still wanted aristocracy, they just wanted it to be wealth based instead of hereditary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You might not have a nobility but you’ve sure as shit got an aristocracy. Cabots, Lowells, Hearsts, Kennedys…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s… honestly sad that this is what makes the news

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Ever since CNN started the 24hr news cycle more and more mundane things are reported on. It’s perfectly fine if you don’t think this is of any value. Some people do and that’s fine too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments