Researchers find deliberate backdoor in police radio encryption algorithm | Vendors knew all about it, but most customers were clueless.::Vendors knew all about it, but most customers were clueless.

29 points
*

Looking forward to someone bringing this up when discussing the ongoing died-but-somehow-always-revived legislations that would introduce backdoors for encryption for government

permalink
report
reply
11 points
4 points

Yeah the ones in EU and UK are kinda fresh, but if I remember correctly, the ones in the US went through different iterations through many years, and keep coming back. There’s also a new-ish one in the US as well I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

There’s a new anti-encryption act in the USA. This page has information about how to oppose it:

The STOP CSAM Act would put security and free speech at risk by potentially making it a crime to offer encryption.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/07/you-can-help-stop-these-bad-internet-bills

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Interesting. I wonder if this was due to a request from certain agencies for anything exported.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Bingo. All of these technologies are controlled by ITAR.

I have zero doubt this was for clandestine use internationally and it was almost inevitable. Outside of a back-door there is no way you’re getting access to properly encrypted net with some of the higher end technologies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

ETSI isn’t controlled by ITAR. You’re on the wrong continent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sure ETSI are responsible for the encryption standard.

And Motorola is free to use that standard on radio handsets made with components of ITAR controlled items.

The use of any component controlled via ITAR will have the entire unit controlled.

Having used a Motorola product covered by ITAR on “the wrong continent” many times.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ah, yes. European radios made by European manufacturers to specifications created by a European agency primarily intended for use in Europe are, in fact, actually being controlled by the US. Am I understanding that correctly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. See also ASML

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

For sure. There are plenty of historical prevents for this exact situation. Makes you wonder why anyone would trust exported “secure” technology from America

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Ah, I see you’re having trouble finding the article. No worries, the link is right up there at the top of the page! I know you’d never intentionally comment before reading the article unless you were struggling to find it; only a redditor would comment without knowing what was being discussed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Didn’t read the article?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Am I the only one annoyed with the sticker not removed from the screen on the picture?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I heard the vendors knew all about it, but most customers were clueless

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Well this is pretty problematic!

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s actually a positive thing since it can be used as an example of why we can’t trust governments with backdoor access to our communications.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 552K

    Comments