Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

371 points

AOC feels like the only hope America has at any improvement.

permalink
report
reply
125 points

I’m glad it seems that many democrats are quitting their Gatekeeping bullshit with AOC.

So frustrating to see people so concerned about the perception of some strawman caricature the right manufacture for our best fighters that we turn on our own. If it wasn’t obvious, they attack her so relentlessly because they fear her and know her potential more some of our own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Nancy Pelosi dedicated the month before Trump was inaugurated to ensuring AOC, a spoiler leftist in a sea of her crony neoliberals, didn’t get an oversight committee seat.

Neoliberals Democrats hate actual leftwing politicians far more than they hate their fascist opposition party. Makes sense, Fascists and neoliberals have the same bosses and take the same bribe checks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nuh-uh! DNC only takes money from the GoOd billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

A thought I had a few days ago,

The left is all about inclusivity and forgiveness unless you’ve made any amount of mispropriety, then it’s a race to drop you as quick as possible.

The right is all about being held accountable for your transgressions, law and order, you do the crime you pay the time, but they have 0 cares about their leaders being held accountable.

I feel like each party is the watchdog for the others politicians, and the left is way too accepting of the right wings transgressions, while the right wing hammers the left as quick and hard as possible (except we just do it to ourselves!)

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I agree with you, except the Democrats are only “left” when compared to Republicans. The USA has a conservative party and a fascist one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I’m more moderate and have always respected AOC, but thought she was too extreme to make a good president. I genuinely believe that the president should be someone who wants to build coalitions and steer the country towards a better future without allowing it to fracture. I still believe that, but I recognize now that my way of thinking can’t win elections in this modern era of politics. Now is the time for a firebrand - someone who would rather lose than compromise. I would still be worried about civil war if AOC became president, but I’m already worried about that now, so no point in holding it against her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

AOC can build coalitions. She even wrote legislation with Ted Cruz. She only stopped working with him after he effectively tried to have her killed on January 6th.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

The irony here is AOC is the one who can build meaningful coalitions you haven’t even realized are possible yet.

The working class is the largest player in this game and she speaks directly to the working class of all stripes.

Moderate neoliberal DINOs speak only to capitalists. That’s why they lost their old base who all went to the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think compromise can only work, if the the other guy thought they could lose it all if things went terribly. Compromising ahead of time says “We both get something, no matter what.” Which in turn removes the fear of loss.

This is a bad quality in a politician, as it excuses sleeping at the wheel. There is no fire under their ass to keep them awake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What is this gatekeeping about AOC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Take a peep into Jeff Jackson, NC AG. Hoping for big things out of him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points
*

Just looked him up and he looks shit.

AOC is great because she is outspoken and holds actual left wing values compared to 99.9% of her party.

This clown seems like a Kamala-lite with his boasting on his law enforcement and military service history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He’s one of the few checks that is actively trying to to regain balance to this shit show. Do not discount a lawyer at the state level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

We would need 60 of her in the senate, or literally anybody else on the blue team, for America to have any hope. Otherwise Republicans will filibuster any spec of salvation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Which is why, for now, the Democrats need to be pulling all the tactics McConnell demonstrated for them under Obama.

FILIBUSTER EVERYTHING.

This is not the time for Democrats to be the Party of smooth-running government.

Use those loopholes the Right-stealers gave themselves in the rules. The only thing they should be voting for is bills that entangle, delay, or reject Trump’s blitzkrieg.

And if they have to talk across the aisle, it should be to remind them that if they hand the Power of the Purse over now, they’ll never get it back and they’ll lose all their value to lobbyists, all their stock-market prescience, all their importance back home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s the fun part, the Republicans in Congress are hardly even attempting to pass any laws. All they’re doing is appointments, which can’t be filibustered as of 2013, except for SCOTUS which can’t be filibustered as of 2017.

All they have to do now is not stop Trump and they win, because Congress is in charge of reigning him in.

You cannot filibuster against doing nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I hope that we can also get a younger white male progressive to work along side her. Not because I think they’d be better, but it might help draw emotionally fragile men who can’t accept a woman in charge. Also, it would mean another progressive reaching the masses, which is always good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

A lot of men are sick of being told they’re emotionally fragile for not wanting to be accused of thoughtcrime. Both sides are responsible for this situation and it doesn’t help to attack the base you’re seeking support from. Dems and you need to learn this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You seem emotionally fragile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

So of course Pelosi shafts her at every turn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m also a Jasmine Crockett from Texas fan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

A millionaire lawyer who

was named as co-chair of the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign and is currently a part of the Democratic Congressional Progressive Caucus.

While giving her husband huge security contracts and buying houses in Hawaii?

Hard pass

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Go on you valiant crusader.

Continue to shit on anyone who isn’t perfect,

Please let us know when you find the correct candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

For texas, that’s a step in the right direction lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

She needs to just start her own party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

she’s the real deal, but i fear she’s been too vilified by the diaper and his cult, and the far-right wastes of humanity that broadcast all the bullshit that enable him, to make successful run for the white house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Any effective progressive is going to be vilified. They will be attacked from all sides, and all of their dirty laundry will be made public. Every flaw, every misstep, every gaff, all of it will be blown out of proportion by the machine they threaten.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They should embrace it. Point out that they are NOT the old guard, and point out the hypocrisy. Trump is a literal rapist. Get the poor women who got molested onto billboards, church sermons, ask musicians to make songs about how crappy Trump is.

The passivity of the Geronocrats is why they lost the respect of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Bernie knew this, to his credit, and made a point to repeat it often, but people weren’t hearing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And Trump hasn’t been vilified?

Vilification doesn’t matter, getting people to turn up matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

333 upvotes and i’m the only one downvoting… We are on lemmy a decentralized and open source platform. Do you really feel this person who use X and meta, who gets featured daily on mass media and who is a member of the red and blue party is ever going to make an actual improvement? The hope for america is that people wake up and realize how hard they are getting fooled by the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What you are saying is basically that they don’t care about doing the wrong thing in order to get votes. AOC has more than 10 millions followers on X, deleting their account and switch to the fediverse would be one of the most useful actions they could possibly do in politics. Personally i don’t expect anyone affiliated with the red and blue party to ever do something similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
157 points

I think regardless of whether you are Republican or a Democrat, AOC is probably the closest to what a representative should be. Now whether you agree with her or not is a different discussion entirely, but that’s not the point I’m trying to make. She’s just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our “representation” are crotchety and corrupt old people that don’t give a shit anymore.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

She’s just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our “representation”

While I agree with almost everything you said, there’s really no good reason to make a statement like that and leave Bernie in with the “vast majority” group. 🙂

The man has walked the walk for a very long time. (Yes he’s too old to run for office now, but he deserves his due!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Political_activism

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I saw a recent interview Bernie did with AOC and I learned that she got into politics specifically because she was inspired by Bernie during his presidential run in 2016. Thats something I didn’t realize and it explains a lot why we feel a lot of the same energy from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s a pretty interesting thing to know, thanks for mentioning it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

My bad. Wasn’t trying to throw Bernie aside. He’s fantastic as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

All good, I wasn’t throwing shade on you just wanting to put in a word for the Bern. 🙂

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I say run him anyways - he can be the token ‘old white dude’, with AOC as his vice. If he kicks the bucket or finds that he is breaking down, he can pass the baton. Otherwise, we get an extra four years of progress for each term he runs. If dementia is a concern, just write a public contract under what terms he is out of the running.

Something like “We know I am getting old. AOC has my right of attorney for determining my mental state.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No argument from me, but I have a suspicion that being old is going to be a third rail politically during the next general election, assuming we get one and that it resembles being a free and valid election in any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Most Americans want progressive policies, they’re just convinced from Cold War propaganda that progressivism/socialism is always the opposite of good.

Bernie stopped running for president after the DNC told him to. He’s proven he doesn’t have what it takes to stand for his principles in a presidential run.

I loved Bernie, even donated to him twice, but he’s a coward and only does lip service these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bernie was ratfucked out of the nomination, no doubt. What happened in West Virginia, for example, where he won all counties and they lied about it, was insane.

But… you cannot blame him or call him a coward for doing the right thing. At some point he saw the writing was on the wall. They were coronating Hillary no matter what. The next president would either be Hillary or Trump. Bernie put country before himself and stood aside. He didn’t make Trump’s path to victory any easier, and actively did his best to prevent a dangerous man from rising to power. None of that makes him a coward, it makes him a leader. A mensch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bernie stopped running for president after the DNC told him to.

What do you mean by this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points
*

I think if we don’t start WW3 and nuke the planet she’s gonna be the first woman president in the US

permalink
report
reply
75 points
*

The DNC would murder her if she broke through their primary defenses and got close enough.

They’re fine with losing, the pendulum is part of the grift, what they aren’t fine with is losing their half of that bipartisan oligarch gravy train. Our capitalists don’t bribe both parties to have those parties stand against economic metastasis at all human cost.

We can have affirmation ribbons and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, or we can have scapegoating and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, that is the extent of our “freedom.” Reagan and Kemp saw to that by getting their former opposition on the take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Serious talk. When are people going to start calling them DINOs. Democrats In Name Only from the Jurassic period.

You think Trump took over the RNC because the old guard liked him?? No he built on the backs of the tea party.

Bernie and the squad were the lefts tea party. What they need now is a charismatic leader to build on it and kick the DINOs out by force.

The DNC is not that powerful. We outnumber them. Stop forgetting we outnumber them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I call the old guard Geronocrats myself. They are old, tired, and very much uninspired. Far as I can tell, Bernie is the only ancient congress critter who is worthy of being called a leader.

Just look at the bill Hakeem Jeffries is trying to pass: to make raiding the US treasury illegal. WTF do we need a new laws for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think this needs to be the strategy for sure. The progressives on the left need to start looking for truly progressive candidates to challenge each established Dem that is up for grabs in the 2026 primaries. Our real fight for democracy is no longer in the general election, it’s in the primaries. If we can’t change the Democratic Party then our only choices are a quick or a slow death

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Now would be a great time to just put the democratic party out of its misery. Looking around the party, we can be comforted that at least it will go peacefully, in its sleep. Let’s at least see if we can get a fresh new party out of all this shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That would be the golden lining from this whole damn mess - political reforms that make the spirit of the Constitution have genuine power, and a rebalancing of the scales. People like Musk should be extinguished, never to return from that dark cesspit known as capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Slave mentality is an unhealthy coping mechanism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Good thing I don’t have that.

If I did, I’d help protect the system when the molitovs start flying at it like a good house slave, I hope to assist when it isn’t just me, as that would just be suicide by cop.

This isn’t class war, this is 50 years of class occupation and counting. Peaceful positive change has been made impossible here on multiple levels by the owners. I put my hope in the other thing, as that’s the only rational place left to put it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Don’t kid yourself. She’ll be the next Bernie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I hope so, but she’s going to have to get through at least another four years, probably more, of being ratted and feathered by Republicans, and somehow still look clean

I still contend that was the real problem with Hillary Clinton. Not that she was a poor candidate or hade some questionable decisions but that Repugnants spent years throwing shit at her so she looked like a mess. She was at least as good as a candidate as anyone else and many of the objections were manufactured

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I honestly think the problem with Hillary had less to do with her as a person and more with the fact that it felt like she was being forced on folks. I am not as educated on all the shenanigans the DNC pulled to get her to be the nominee over Bernie, but I know that for a lot of folks it felt like the DNC just did what they obviously keep doing and gave the job to the person they deemed “deserved it” for their own internal bs reasons, while ignoring the constituents they claim to represent. Her nomination felt like a precursor to Harris being nominated without a primary. I think that’s also where a lot of disillusionment comes from on the left, the dem party just doesn’t seem to have any desire to even pretend that they care about their constituents

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hillary has been groomed since her early thirties to be the DNC’s precious darling. Living in mansions, waited on by servants.

AOC has been working real jobs trying to stay alive like most Americans have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The difference is that AOC is doing what politicians are supposed to do and establishing an identity for herself that would allow her to connect with voters. Clinton, on the other hand, presented herself as a blank slate and then whined when her enemies filled that slate in.

Clinton had a problem with her public image for years before 2016 and resolutely refused to do anything about it, instead just blaming others at every turn. That attitude shows that she would have been a shitty President. Better than Trump, of course (there are few people who wouldn’t be) but still shitty by any objective measure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

All true but I thought she would have been an effective president, due to focussing on organization, negotiations, influence, and that she was generally for the same platform as bill, so I’d generally agree with it (but with obvious caveats). She would have gotten things done, but in a democratic way instead of a fascist way, and those things would align with the generic Democrat platform

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I sure hope so, she’s got what it takes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unless the republicans field a multiple rapist convict again. Then it’s a tossup and a guaranteed L, if there’s a war somewhere the genocide people can get behind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points
*

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the internet manifest:

1- blame her for having millions due to kickbacks

2- when she proves that her net worth is less than 500K make fun of her for having too little money

permalink
report
reply
50 points

There’s many things that expose the Right Wing Grift.

When AOC was first elected they mocked her for being a Bartender who “rose above her station”

What more proof do you need that the American Dream is bullshit

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They call at that because you’d have to be asleep to believe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

When it’s a teacher - she reminds me of that mean lady who failed me

When it’s a doctor - they’re pushing a vaxxer agenda

When it’s an engineer - he’ll be a bad negotiator

When it’s a scientist - we’ve gotta do what? No thanks.

When it’s a lawyer - ah perfect they make everything better

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I mean if you take the internet as a monolith, you’ll find contradictions every where. Some people will hate A because of B, some people will hate A because of C, but either way A is getting hate for both B and C.

So either there are millions of people online with different opinions but the crowd looks the same, or there is one very, very busy troll who is running all the accounts.

~help I’m so tired they won’t give me a break to pee~

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

One busy troll? What makes you think it is just one person? Maybe if it was the 1990’s you might have had a single troll per social platform but we are way past that point. A real troll would even be considered high quality with so many bot accounts nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The trolls are the people who watch cable news

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Because it’s ONE SIDED around here, just like Reddit… if a Republican said this EXACT same thing, they’d be crucified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

I hope that AOC has a security detail, a go bag and plan, and an ideal state to reside in. It is my expectation for Yarvin’s Cabel to try to capture or assasinate her at some point, since she is one of the few major lightning rods to be the president of a Free America. We will need great people to organize the defense of our people against the fascist agenda.

Bernie, AOC, others, stay safe and strong. 🖖

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m not in the know. What is “Yarvin’s Cabel”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That is the name that I have given to the authors of Project 2025. It is basically a playbook on how to take over America and to dismantle democracy. Curtis Yarvin is likely the leader of the bunch in a ideological sense. If Trump and Elon is disposed, it would be problematic if Yarvin and his friends didn’t get caught in the net. We have to make a point that America’s takeover was a planned group effort.

Curtis Yarvin, wikipedia

Project 2025 - Mandate for Leadership, PDF at the Internet Archive

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you, kind Internet stranger!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 25K

    Posts

  • 661K

    Comments