7 points

Like the only thing we have is military tech superiority, or wed be wiped off the map

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Most expensive ≠ best, it just means most expensive

permalink
report
parent
reply

No other country has the amount of aircraft carriers, air refueling tankers, and awacs aircraft as the US. You need all of this shit for invading countries across the world. Other nations really don’t have the capacity for invasion and imperialism that the Americans do. Even if it’s massively overpriced and the capabilities inflated, downplaying the strength of the enemy is not a recipe for victory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You need all that shit to bomb poor countries with little air defense. To modern developed militaries, all of those are just expensive targets.

IMO fighting a peer military will be all about who has better (& cheaper) missiles and drones, and probably stealth aircraft and artillery to a lesser extent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Like crime said, but to nitpick, those three you cited are pretty useless for the actual invasion force. The real invasion forces are by land and sea, which America also has the largest amphibious assault fleet and military sea lift capability. But, let’s not kid ourselves about the actual challenges of invading a peer/near peer nation: amphibious landing ships have enormous radar cross sections (even the fancy San Antonio class) and would be easily sunk by anyone with antiship missile capabilities, especially with how close they actually have to be to the shore.

Using post-WWII invasions as a guide, the real key is to invade your neighbor or having an adjacent nation under your thumb to stage invasion forces in, as large scale amphibious operations are incredibly difficult to actually pull off.

Of course, if you invade Grenada then you could pull it off with just aircraft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That would be superior size, not superior tech

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Superior tech like the F-35?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If the F-35 is our superior tech, we don’t have much of an edge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

So superior it crashes by itself

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Superior at decapitating pilots maybe lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Do they just not tell trump how op our military is so he doesnt abuse it? Couldnt hide nukes but hide the jets

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah like our sick 6th gen fighters or hypersonic missiles oh wait

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

really? he thinks the amount of weapons are the problem? and not that there’s nowhere near enough manpower who are motivated enough to sacrifice their life for pocket change and the noble goal of raising profits for some delusional oligarchs?

permalink
report
reply

He doesn’t think he needs manpower because he can simply use AI

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Will this be how we get skynet / A. M. ? Bazinga kill bots where you have to pay a monthly subscription to not be hunted for sport

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

i would love to see him try

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

WeaponX contracts when? /s

permalink
report
reply

He will buy Boston Dynamics, rebrand it as X-terminate, use one of those shitty robots as a weapons platform and call it a “Dalek”, for the epic memes. Then pretend he inverted it right before it fails spectacularly and kill a shitload of bystanders during a test deployment. Trump will sink $100b into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nah Musk doesn’t strike me as someone who knows Dr Who

He would however call it ED-209 without a hint of irony

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He’d definitely name it after space Nazis, yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You should pitch this to him

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

midpool

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

My guy you can’t even win at videogames you are not a military strategist. That said he’s probably right just because it is fucking obvious.

permalink
report
reply

idk paying people to win games for you is a pretty good strategy, don’t know how well it’d translate to irl military strategy though lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I mean that’s basically how it’s done: pay a bunch of soldiers to fight the war for you

permalink
report
parent
reply

Mercenaries, e.g., Blackwater or whatever the fuck they’ve changed their names to in order to avoid prosecution for war crimes

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The headline is

But I hope he does try to “reform” the Us military, then they’ll lose the next war even worse.

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6K

    Posts

  • 166K

    Comments