-10 points

They never said they wouldn’t come for migrants without criminal records; they only said that they’d target them first. So if they come across other migrants in their targeted search for those with criminal records, they still consider those to be valid arrests.

edit: to address the comments: I said that they think of then as valid arrests, not that I did.

permalink
report
reply
-23 points

They ARE valid arrests lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This person was in the country legally.

Are these also valid arrests?

https://truthout.org/articles/family-us-citizens-shopping-in-milwaukee-was-detained-for-speaking-spanish/

How about these?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/navajo-ice-trump-immigration-raid-b2687402.html

Should those Native Americans be deported back where they came from?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Basic law 101 here. An important part of your development you should not overlook

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt since you said they consider them to be valid arrests, not that you do. The crime is, of course, not being white.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

How does having immigrated here make the arrest valid if they didn’t even commit a crime? Also why do you seem to believe them when they call it a targeted search when there have been constant reports like this one of random people getting picked up, some not even immigrants?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They said targetted first, but not exclusively. I don’t like whats going on. But it is being portrayed as a surprise. No one should be surprised by this. If anything it hasn’t been as bad as predicted… yet. Overall, thier goal is actually fear. They hope that will deter others from coming in so they can declare what a good job they did securing the borders. And the idea of scared immigrants makes thier base happy. So it’s win win for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This person was here legally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They consider just being here illegal, thus committing a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Valid arrests.”

Wow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points

Legal or illegal migrants. That’s the only distinction that matters. Illegal? Bye!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m “glad” to see Kaboom has some competition for once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Whatever that means… bye!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It doesn’t fucking matter. Illegal or legal, they do not deserve to be sent to Gitmo. Nobody deserves to be sent there.

Or are you somehow arguing that concentration camps are fine, for some people. Then let’s hope you don’t belong to a group that becomes the other in the future.

And apparently they also arrest legal immigrants now. So eh… well done, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

My concern ends at the illegal entry part, past that whatever happens is the consequences of their actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wish you a very happy finding out

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You know they’re being put in Gitmo, right? The place where the worst of the worst terrorists are supposed to go? You’re okay with that? That’s the level of crime you think they’ve committed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Carlos was in the US legally. He followed the rules, entering the US under a government asylum program.

“He came to the U.S. from Venezuela in November through CBP One, a mobile app created by the federal government used by asylum seekers to schedule an appointment in the U.S.-Mexico border. Migrants who secured an appointment were allowed in the country temporarily while they await their immigration hearing.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Shit happens during major change, the important part is that change is happening in a positive direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My concern ends at the illegal entry part, past that whatever happens is the consequences of their actions.

gets informed person was here legally

Shit happens

Uh huh. So the comment you made only minutes prior about your concern ending at the illegal entry part was a lie. It looks like your concern ends when it’s affecting non-white people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A leaked memo from the DOJ has them approving the death penalty for people without papers and that’s a positive direction to you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

“Thanks to each wave of new arrivals to this land of opportunity, we’re a nation forever young, forever bursting with energy and new ideas, and always on the cutting edge, always leading the world to the next frontier. This quality is vital to our future as a nation. If we ever closed the door to new Americans, our leadership in the world would soon be lost.”

-fucking Ronald Reagan.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I mean… It’s good for the fucking economy and national security. The whole, growing economy thing… I’ve never played a 4x game and thought… better stop producing food and encouraging population growth before I have too much production capabilities and the resources to trade for diplomatic power. (This isn’t reddit but mandatory disclaimer hoi4 and Stellaris antixenos are a vocal minority 😬😅)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Republicans love illegal immigrants

  • they’re great as unprotected group to attack to distract from their lack of helpful policy.

  • they’re a great thing to campaign on for their racist uneducated voter base

  • they can appease big buisness by giving them labor for slave wages domestically

There’s a reason Republicans attack leagal avenues to immigrate, and lower border security to let more people in illegally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

First they came for the immigrants

And I did not speak out

Because I was not an immigrant

Then they came for the trans people

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a trans person

Then they came for the trades unionists

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a trades unionist

Then they came for the non-Christians

And I did not speak out

Because I was a Christian on paper

Then they came for me

And there was no one left

To speak out for me

permalink
report
reply
11 points

First they came for the immigrants

And I spoke out, because I knew the rest of the fucking poem.

But no one listened, and I screamed futilely into the cloud until they came for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

“I’ve always said, we might be from the same country, but we are 100 percent in agreement that if someone harms someone that person should leave,” Marian said in Spanish. “But I never made that comment thinking it could happen to me and my family.”

So frustrating

permalink
report
reply
8 points

“So…many…faces…” urp

(the fact that he’s a cop makes it even better)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Haha is that a character from something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Zootopia. No idea how I know that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Zootopia, and he’s actually a nice guy despite being a cop. That’s how you know he’s fictional even more than him being an anthropomorphic leopard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 23K

    Posts

  • 589K

    Comments