Summary

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s plan to place 2,200 USAID employees on administrative leave as part of efforts to shut down the agency.

The American Foreign Service Association and the American Federation of Government Employees argued the move was unconstitutional and harmful to global humanitarian efforts.

Judge Carl Nichols issued a limited restraining order but has not yet ruled on 500 workers already on leave.

DOJ defended the decision, citing alleged corruption and fraud at USAID.

16 points

If Trump is accusing them of fraud I feel like they’re the least corrupt department of the government.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The federal judges are keeping my hope alive lately

permalink
report
reply
29 points

DOJ, there is corruption in the government, but it ain’t coming from USAID. You might want to look upward in your org chart if you’re worried about corruption.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

More like inward

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

More like “Invert selection” for all of the things they’re currently targeting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Conservative projection 101

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

if there was in usaid, it’d be a select few contractors milkin’ the system for what they can. probably the ones that have republican congress-critters in their pockets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When is Cucklon Musk going to audit the PPP loans. I heard MAGAs loved that program.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 24K

    Posts

  • 593K

    Comments