I am forever bitter about Eragon…

5 points

Di Vinci Code was butchered, and I’m sorry to say it but Hanks was the wrong choice for Robert Langdon.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It should’ve been Van Damme. Then actione starred his way to the climax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For some reason I always pictured Clive Owen for the role of Langdon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mostly enjoyed the book until the antagonist made such a huge error by revealing himself way too early that it ruined the whole thing for me. The other books in the series also had major issues that just ruined them as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Most of them? Lord of the Rings is the exception not the rule

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Plus Princess Bride. I actually prefer the film.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The book Jurassic Park is great, I’ll take the movie every time given the choice

But these are all still exceptions, adaptations are usually best when they are either extremely book accurate or handled by a competent artist and not a studio or group of producers

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

There’s a list of great ones.
Shawshank.
Fight Club.
2001 (kinda cheating tho).
Green Mile.
The Godfather.
American Psycho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Since you brought up Kubrick I’d say pretty much his whole filmography is better, with the Shining being the lone debatable exception

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Kubrick…good adaptions

You mean Stanley “I didn’t even read the entirety of A Clockwork Orange” Kubrick? Mister “Actually let’s age up the girl in Lolita and spend time focusing on how sexy she is”? That Kubrick? Dude completely ignores the point of both books and does the one thing the authors very specifically do not want you to do

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh definitely. These were just of the top of my head, there’s plenty of other good book movies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Not the best Crichton novel, but Sphere. The book was a fun read but not even the combined powers of Dustin Hoffman and Samuel L Jackson could make the movie adaptation palatable.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I liked the book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

World War Z.

Book: Absolutely brilliant “documentary” from the survivors of a fictional zombie outbreak. Goes deep in to the details of high command and front line soldiers about how their initial assumptions were flawed and the ethical nightmare they were faced on a day to day basis. From wondering if they are killing infected people that could eventually be cured to strategically letting uninfected cities be used as zombie bait giving them time to prepare defenses elsewhere. All told way after the fact when the charcters have benefit of hindsight giving them lots of room to be reminest, express regret and throw shade at each other on why someone ELSES arrogance got people killed. Super funny writing and a nice tide clever book overall.

Movie: Brad Pitt, playing a non-scientist, runs around and finds the cure for the zombie virus in like two days. Forgettable action movie that does nothing unique or interesting.

Audiobook: Full voice casted by A list names who absolutely nail it. Faithful to the original text and lightyears ahead of. the movie. IMHO, it’s the best audiobook experince around.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The North Korea section of the book was so creepy, I still think about that from time to time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fantastic book. Ok movie that seemed like it wasn’t related to the book at all. The scariest part is that the book accurately predicted how humans would react to an outbreak like Covid. Spoiler alert: not well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Eragon never got a movie.

Atla never got a movie

These things are true.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Eragon was not a great book. It was a decent premise, the characters and story had potential. Given it was written by a teenager, it’s very impressive.

But Mr Paolini must look back on it and cringe so bad. I’d actually like him to go back and reboot it now as a mature author.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean are you judging it as the target market?

It was a young adult book. I refer to it as baby’s first high fantasy.

Do 8-12 year old boys that will love super long high fantasy later in life probably still love it? I would bet money.

But of course as adults we look down on the young adult book. Basically all young adult books seem not well made as adults.

I know a handful of exceptions, but they stand out in my head as remarkable because they were exceptions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fiction Books

!fiction@literature.cafe

Create post

The discussion of fiction books! Please tag spoilers and follow instance rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

Community stats

  • 47

    Monthly active users

  • 103

    Posts

  • 620

    Comments

Community moderators