Nationally, a study by Yale researchers determined that “the excess [COVID] death rate among Republican voters was 43% higher than the excess death rate among Democratic voters.”

They are literally being deceived to death.

95 points

This is a natural outcome of conservatism, what is conservatism trying to conserve? The existing power structures in society of course. So the power of God over man, of men over women, of white people over other races, and of rich over poor. Science must be rejected because science gives evidence against the supremacy of god, men, the white race and the rich.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Also, the stereotypical conservative is someone who loves to be lied to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They don’t love being lied to. They love being told they’re great and wonderful and better than “others”. That that is a boldface and egregious lie is not the part they focus on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No, they are literally thrilled by being lied to. That’s why we have Qkooks, Birtherkooks, Bircherkooks, Sandyhookkooks, Start the Steal kooks, Hermancainers etc. Conservatives keep making up 100% total hoaxes over and over and over. They think dishonesty is a virtue and honesty is a vice. It doesn’t even matter if yesterdays lie “it was Antifa” completely contradicts today lie “they were tourists”. All that matters is the thrill they get by not having to acknowledge reality in this particular moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

This has been their platform literally forever; rather than have to learn anything or improve themselves, just deny that knowledge or betterment exists.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Yep. One of the 3 core Republican party slogans is this:

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Didn’t work for drugs, definitely not going to work for science. Like a quarterback who keeps running the same three failing plays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Matt Canada enters the chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

the right wing racists are using a same tactic in Australia to block the indigenous people from having a voice in parliament with a ‘if you don’t know vote no’ campaign. we’re having a referendum which means we’re changing the constitution, the gist is we’re going to finally properly recognise the aboriginal people (the ones that lived here for 60k years plus) and give them a permanant ability to voice their concerns in parliament.

it’s disgusting and transparent for the anti information angle, however it sadly seems to be working and now likely the people that have endured mass genocide will again be silenced by the white right elites. Australia will remain one the most racist places on the planet.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

First and foremost, I’ll be voting yes.

The problem with our referendum is that it appears to burn a lot of political capital for the sake of gesture politics that is unlikely to change anything of substance. The voice has no teeth and almost everything about it will be determined by the courts at the time.

Now, it’s better than nothing, and I don’t expect it’ll come at the expense of the lack of better alternatives on the horizon, but it’s frustrating we can’t do something more meaningful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

A reminder: it’s what the First Nation Council asked for. It’s a decade of work that has been approved and agreed upon by everyone involved.

That is, what you’re complaining about are features, not bugs.

Edit: also, for it to have teeth in the future, Australia needs to get more Greens or other suitable 3rd parties into power which support The Voice.

While hopefully Australia will get The Voice, which will mean it won’t be able to be easily removed - what’s important (as always) is voting for the future of Australia and not coal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Exactly. A voice shouldnt have teeth either, but id like it to have some reasonable powers of compelling testimony as well as an ability to formally ask for records but that’s just me personally.

Vote yes!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Voice also won’t do anything though. If politicians want to hear the voice of the people they can go listen to them.

The companies ruining indigenous land have been financing the voice referendum, an advisory body like that could easily be used to justify themselves. It’s gone that way before. “Progressive No” has the best opinions, listen to Lidia Thorpe and those that put treaty first, both sides want to assimilate indigenous people into settler colonial society. Both a yes and no victory will be a success for the racists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

You can’t fix stupid.

/“It’s Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain

permalink
report
reply
20 points

If you squint and slightly misinterpret it, Darwin says stupid will fix itself eventually.

You just have to not save it at the last second.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Unfortunately they compromise herd immunity for the people who can’t get vaccinated for legitimate reasons, so they’re intent on taking a few of us with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Unfortunately, my wife’s niece has leukemia and as such doesn’t really have her own immune system, so not only can she not get the vaccine, she would almost definitely die if she got covid.

When we got married, we decided masks on for the event, and that made our first choice maid of honor to flip her shit on us about how we’re not kuzzling her, and called us sheep. Then she got a face tattoo.

A few of her family members decided to no longer speak to us over masks, even though they KNOW her family and know her niece is immunocompromised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Not much short of magic is going to stop climate collapse at this point, so I think we’re good on that front. Hopefully it gets us all, this whole mess will only start over if it doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Isn’t killing your constituents a bad long term political strategy?

permalink
report
reply
74 points

They don’t plan to win with votes.

Republicans no longer believe in the Republic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They’re all in with this guy Gerry. He’s manderin’ all over tarnation!

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

They already don’t have a long term. They have to do a coup this decade or they’re fucked. Loyalty is more important than long term voting here

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Covid was a great litmus test for that question and republicans failed miserably

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

stupid people breed more, so so long as the birth rate among republicans less the excess death rate outstrips the birthrate plus the excess survivial of the democrats then they will increase their vote share.

whether that’s the case or not i don’t know but they have other pokers in the fire. attacking education in multiple ways for instance. dragging the next generation down to their level.

Their well documented gerrymandering

Their attacks on the fabric of democracy itself. if you can’t win elections, get rid of them.

Their stacking of the courts

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

In true Republican fashion however, they’ve flubbed it. The youth is overwhelmingly for Democrats and outright loathes Republicans. Either controlling the poor hasn’t turned out that effective for them*, or it’s too early to see results. And in the meantime, they’re killing their already aging and dwindling base.

*I think they’ve failed to brainwash young poor children. The vast majority of people I graduated high school with a decade ago, in the Midwest, have become clearly liberal and Democrat. Even the ones who were conservative in school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re targeting Gen Alpha though (and the one after that). Gen Z is just about out of K12, but their younger siblings have to deal with stuff like PragerU being part of the official curriculum. I hope the teachers can work around it, but it looks grim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If only more people voted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Republican politicians live by “I’ll be gone, you’ll be gone” at the end of the day.

They know the rest of us will be stuck holding the bag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My parent actually said this to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

These people barely see to the next election. Rarely beyond the fiscal quarter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re kidding yourself if you think they have any long-term policies. Anything they’re doing is to have an immediate effect, even if they’re doing it at the cost of their own well-being.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Well they aren’t smart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s why Fox News famously started touting the vaccine after it came out. They realized their base was dying out faster than democrats. This backpedaling helped push co serrations away from fox News to other sources.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments