83 points

Why’s everyone blaming the engineers lol, pretty sure they’re just doing what they’re told right?

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Just following orders is not the ironclad excuse some of you seem to think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re still bad people, but this kind of blame has to run uphill. The devs only have the option of quitting, not necessarily of not doing what they’re told.

That being said, I bet there are some Very Good Boys who enthusiastically and proactively suggest some evil shit to the execs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean shit, they aren’t launching nukes here

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Look dude, I hate advertising as much as anyone. I don’t want any TV and most streaming services have wedged in some form of advertising nowadays and I avoid all that.

But equating engineers trying to solve a problem like engineers figuring out how to block ads isn’t really equivalent to murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

People only get held accountable for their actions and choices when the consequences are equivalent to murder? Their bosses hold some of the blame, sure, but they are not blameless and pretending they are just enables shit like this to keep happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Software engineers have ethics classes, I’d imagine this would fall highly under unethical, just under building software for the military which google employees have protested in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Losing your ad blocker on chrome is “just under” software designed to kill people? Lol really? Oh the oppression

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Sure it won’t kill people like programming drones, but it is still unethical and would affect ~5 billion people negatively.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Software engineers have ethics classes

We do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It was required for my degree, I’m sure it is required at more than just my university lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because it is still unclear if this is an official project requested by Google or just some engineers working alone until Google adopts the project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The chances that a swashbuckling crew of rogue engineers organized a secret skunkworks project to implement their heartfelt, idealistic vision of an adblocker free web are… low.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

True, but it’s not zero

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This is exactly something an engineer who works at Google would want to work on, finding new ways to enrich Google is literally their job and there would be great personal benefit from coming up with the best way to implement this DRM crap for profit

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ah yes, because “just following orders” has worked out so well in the past.

That’s right, I just godwin’d this bitch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Exactly, headline should be more like “Google executives want Google engineers to make ad-blocking (near) impossible”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Isn’t Google famous for giving a large amount of creative freedom to their engineers (and having a lot of dead published products as a result)? Also, Google engineers are not exactly stuck at their job with little hope of finding anything else to survive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I believe that policy was reduced or removed many years ago. Around the time when all the cool new projects stopped, and Google scrubbed “don’t be evil” from their site and company philosophy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

a decade ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Doing what you’re told does not relieve you of responsibility for the results of your actions

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The engineers are not blame free, and can do super shady shit too. For example, the issues with the WebHID “broswer” APIs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

For a tech community there are a lot of uninformed and fear mongering posts in here. From the article:

What About Browser Modifications and Extensions?

Google’s proposal remains ambiguous about its impact on browser modifications and extensions. It attests to the legitimacy of the underlying hardware and software stack without restricting the application’s functionality. However, how this plays out with browsers that allow extensions or are modified remains a grey area. As the proposal vaguely mentions, “Web Environment Integrity attests the legitimacy of the underlying hardware and software stack, it does not restrict the indicated application’s functionality.”

Basically it can be summed up as “nothing in the new thing actually says it will make blocking ads impossible or even harder, but who knows right? So just trust that it will based on nothing other than fear mongering”

Sites have been detecting ad blockers and refusing to show you content unless you disable them for years. Sites already have paywalls as drm to restrict what you can see. This really isn’t bringing the ability do any of these DRM things since those already exist.

Having said all that - is there much of a reason for this new thing to exist? Debatable at this stage. The only benefit I can see to users is it could eliminate captchas and other “are you human?” checks, as well as maybe reduce cheaters in browser based games (which tbh I don’t even know if that’s a thing).

permalink
report
reply
1 point

The only benefit I can see to users is it could eliminate captchas

#CAPTCHA elimination is not a benefit. The CAPTCHA motive of separating humans from bots is responsible for killing beneficial bots. The only good thing about it is humans get fed-up with CAPTCHAs and the captcha-pushers lose human traffic. That backlash is a good thing™. Remove that backlash and beneficial bots are defeated on a much larger scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I think the issue is that Google has both A) a track record of backdooring restrictions on adblocking, and B) an overwhelming motivation to do so seeing as how they generate their revenue from online advertising. They’ve forfeited the benefit of the doubt, especially when they’ve already disclosed that the whole point of the change is to enhance the profitability of online advertising:

Google’s engineers elaborate, “Websites funded by ads require proof that their users are human and not bots…Social websites need to differentiate between real user engagement and fake engagement”

So given that once implemented, this hop and this skip would just require a teensy jump in order to further restrict adblocking, it is reasonable to assume that’s within their desired goals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Google has a track record of attack articles written against them, all talking up their intentions to tank adblocking, including this attack article. And yet, my adblocker still works and my ads are still blocked. Strange that we just assume this is what they intend to do, when there’s no evidence they’ve pulled it off, we treat it as if they have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Are you really certain that Google is trying to eliminate adblocking is just an alarmist assumption?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

💯. People are talking like there’s currently no way for websites to detect ad blockers or implement paywalls, and this is Googles way of doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

In other posts, I’ve tried to point out how some of the articles and comments around WEI are more speculative than factual and received downvotes and accusations of boot-licking for it. Welcome to the club, I guess.

The speculation isn’t baseless, but I’m concerned about the lack of accurate information about WEI in its current form. If the majority of people believe WEI is immediately capable of enforcing web page integrity, share that incorrect fact around, and incite others, it’s going to create a very good excuse for dismissing all dissenting feedback of WEI as FUD. The first post linking to the GitHub repository brought in so many pissed off/uninformed people that the authors of the proposal actually locked the repo issues, preventing anyone else from voicing their concerns or providing examples of how implementing the specification could have unintended or negative consequences.

Furthermore, by highlighting the DRM and anti-adblock aspect of WEI, it’s failing to give proper attention to many of the other valid concerns like:

  • Discrimination against older hardware/software that doesn’t support system-level environment integrity enforcement (i.e. Secure Boot)
  • The ability for WEI to be used to discriminate between browsers and provide poor (or no) service to browsers not created by specific corporations.
  • The possibility of WEI being used in a way to force usage of browsers provided by hostile vendors
  • The ability for it to be used to lock out self-built browsers or forked browsers.
  • The potential for a lack in diversity of attesters allowing for a cartel of attesters to refuse validation for browsers they dislike.

I very well could be wrong, but I think our (the public) opinions would have had much more weight if they were presented in a rational, informed, and objective manner. Talking to software engineers as people generally goes down better than treating them like a cog in the corporate machine, you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
-8 points

I fail to see how the engineers building the technical side of this are relevant to this case. It’s not their decision to put this into Chromium or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Dude they’re not murdering people they implemented tech use a new browser

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

True, it was not their decision, but they had the choice to show google the middle finger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The next person would do it then. I don’t see that as a solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You always have a decision. Especially when you’re a highly qualified engineer that could choose to work somewhere else easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You say that like it’s easy to deal with a sudden loss of income and the potential that their living situation will radically change before they land that new job. I can’t imagine that working at that level leads to particular quick interview and hiring processes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You think they acted alone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They acted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s petty as fuck. I’m an ex google eng and it’s not up to us what we work on. We get paid to work on shit and if we don’t do it someone else will. Plenty of resumes in the pool ready to hop in and take someone’s spot. Blame the company not the people doing the grunt work.

It’s like blaming the barista for the menu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Please don’t blame the people who were forced to implement this. There are engineers to blame behind all shitty tech in the world. They’re just trying to work a job. There aren’t exactly a lot of jobs in the tech industry where you don’t work for some of the evilest motherfuckers alive building unimaginably evil stuff. I’m all for directing as much hate, vitriol, credible threats of violence, etc at the people on top, but let’s leave the poor sap who they forced to do their dirty work alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Lmao yoavweiss seems to have recently broken the 4 year hiatus on his personal blog to make a new post about how the discussions around this retarded proposal are not constructive enough.

The most constructive that can ever be said about this is “fuck right off” dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Google executives want this, NOT the engineers.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Their engineers are super fucking shady too. For example, the issies with the WebHID “browser” APIs

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They put their name on it. I hope it was monetary worth it because the public should not cut them any slack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 20K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 615K

    Comments