250 points

I mean you could even take the bottom number and leave them with the top number and they could still live in unimaginable luxury forever. Or just take the lot because fuck em lol.

permalink
report
reply
90 points

I couldn’t imagine spending $1 billion in my entire life, let alone 3-4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

and these people are even 100× richer than other billionaires

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

A million seconds is about 12 days. A billion seconds is about 32 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The proportional difference is the same, i.e. the same number of orders of magnitude separate them, but in absolute terms, someone with $10B is closer in wealth to your or I than to Bezos (which, to be clear, does not mean we shouldn’t take it, merely that the height Bezos is at is unfathomable)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Most of their billions is ownership in companies they grew into what they are today. It’s not like they have billions to spend, it’s that their ownership is worth billions according to the market.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

True, but that ownership gives them access to very low interest loans that they then use as spending money and don’t have to pay taxes on it

https://www.businessinsider.com/american-billionaires-tax-avoidance-income-wealth-borrow-money-propublica-2021-6

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

They could go to any bank and leverage that asset for a loan for more than everyone who posts on this platform will make in their lifetimes no problem. That is a nonsense talking point

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

While that may be technically true, is running defense for these people who would happily see you and everone you care about die if it would make them another buck really something you want to be doing?

permalink
report
parent
reply

yes this is true but they have so much money available to spend that it makes amounts practically meaningless

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

You all realize they don’t have that money laying around to pay the IRS right? They own companies, those companies are worth that much. To pay that you would have to liquidate those companies. So no more Amazon, Tesla, Space X, etc…

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

no more Amazon, Tesla, Space X, etc…

Oh no! Anyway, so how can we make this happen, like, yesterday?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Don’t be a bootlicker or bot or idiot.

When they sell their shares to buy twitter or pay the tax man, those companies still exist. It just means that other people get to buy those shares and that’s a good thing, because that way those companies get owned by the public.

Tesla and SpaceX still exist even after Elon overpaid by some $30B for his Twitter adventure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

That’s the thing people don’t get. The ultra wealthy are wealthy on paper.

On an average years. All of us make more than Elon in wages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

You’re making it sound like the wealthy are rich in technicality only. Maybe the majority of their assets aren’t liquid but they’re still damn wealthy more than “on paper.”

And singling out wages as the only source of income to prove Elon isn’t “actually” wealthy is disingenuous at best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

What did Elon get paid, excluding stock options at companies he works for?

I bet he still makes more than me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What does that matter? He doesn’t take wages intentionally. He has a large stock portfolio that he can borrow against and thereby pay no taxes on that “income”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Well they are public companies bar space x so. Just redistribute those shares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Brings a tear to my eye, I tells ya

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Don’t threaten me with a good time

permalink
report
parent
reply

I would be happy to take taxes in the form of ownership of the company

here the tax genius of Henry the 8th comes into play “pay me my money or else”

when noblemen didn’t pay william the conqueror the taxes he felt were due on time he would boil them. The principle being that if the rich face consequences for breaking the law they obey.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You don’t have to liquidate. Giving governments around the world more of a direct say in these international companies would be good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No, they’d just need to liquidate their share in those companies. Those shares would then get bought up by other people or by pension funds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or picked apart by private equity vultures at the expense of pension funds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I highly recommend you to read the paper billionare argument. The market can stand the liquidation of most of those companies without making them go bankrupt, we don’t want them to stop existing, just to make them smaller and not a threat to democracy.

For the whole scale of wealth I also recommend going through wealth shown to scale

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Can billionaires liquidate their assets? Yes, it is theoretically possible

The real question is, who is going to buy the assets?

Let’s say we have a billionaire that owns a billion dollar company.

Could that billionaire sell all their shares, get a billion dollars in cash, and then give it away. Yes, it is possible.

But that billion dollars in cash has to come from somewhere. Either the citizens have to come with a billion dollars in cash or the government.

If the citizens spend a billion to buy the shares, then the government takes the billion in cash from the billionaire, then the government gives a billion back to the citizens. You just basically printed an extra billion dollars for the economy, which causes inflation. Because the citizens now have two billion in stocks and cash, compared to just one billion in cash.

Our fiat money system has flaws, one day it is going to crash.

But Besos’ 100+ billion in Amazon stock is money tied up outside of the economy until he sells.

Forcing him to sell and introduce that money into the economy has repercussions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

All they’d need to liquidate is part of their ownership in said companies. Companies themselves will be ok, don’t you worry your bleeding heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not true at all. Loss of controlling ownership makes a company vulnerable to a hostile takeover. The new owners will pick it apart like the vultures they are.

RIP grannies pension plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

If they are self-made millionaires/billionaires as they claim, take everything they have/own and tell them to start the quest again, no glitches, DLC, or saved progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the garfield wealth tax

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
6 points

This isn’t capitalism, this is corporatism

permalink
report
parent
reply

Go ahead and define those terms

permalink
report
parent
reply

theres no such thing as corporatism, liberal

Death to America

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

You’d have to be dense to think this is capitalism. The corporations are clearly communist

permalink
report
parent
reply

This isn’t communism, this is clearly monarchism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

This isn’t capitalism, this is corporatism

Which is capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply

Boo-Yah!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Corporatism is fascism and not “corporations misbehaving according to my ideals”, which is just capitalism. I’m not making any statement about capitalism degenerating to fascism here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

they are the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No, this is actually existing capitalism. The utopian fantasies of capitalist theorists like Adam Smith and Keynes simply do not work or exist in reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

In terms of Smith writing about his present conditions, I think it was accurate enough for mercantile society. The problem (besides his not-always-reasonable history) is that because he often failed to distinguish first principles from idiosyncracies, the logic of his observations shatters in any other context (e.g. global capitalism).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Funny how capitalism seems to evolve into “corporatism” every time. Almost like there’s a well-documented cycle, or something

permalink
report
parent
reply

embarrassing

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I want to try taxing first. Maybe if we can just remake a bunch of Pre-Reagan SEC rules and raise the top earning brackets, add some tiers, that might help like it did after the Gilded Age and Great Recession.

Of course the only way to do any of that is to vote blue and the USA is kind of fucked as far as the political spectrum goes. Again, Reagan’s fault for deregulating campaign finance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
129 points

Tax billionaires until there are no more billionaires

permalink
report
reply
83 points

It’s really insane that we legally treat the tenth billion dollars at the same level as a working persons house or car.

Everything is legally just “property”.

No, fuck that.

The law should protect the first million of every citizen with ferver. (and when we tackle wealth inequality, most people will have this level of wealth at the end of their working life. The fact that most currently don’t is due to inequality. )

Up until 100 million, it should be taxed at a reasonable level. Because at some level, it’s fair that people prefer watching Taylor Swift instead of me sing on a stage.

Above that it should be taxed heavily.

And above a billion, it should be just confiscated. As in, oopsie, our system malfunctioned, you weren’t supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a whole lifetime of work, so we are taking it back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

you weren’t supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a while lifetime of work

I actively try to cheat at every single-player game that I play. I still don’t think I’ve accumulated a billion anything other than self-criticisms. Even that’s questionable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s actually taxes less if it’s earned from investments

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’m cool with numbers past a billion being asymptotically possible. Let the money-addicts keep chasing N+1 dollars, if each +1 puts ten times more money into public funding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

The problem is that this wealth is ownership in companies they made. If you start a company and it becomes too successful, Is it right that we really just forcefully take that ownership away from you? Who wants to start or keep a company in a country that takes away your company from you if it’s too successful?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yes, I’m sure if Jeff Bezos were worth 10 billion dollars less he would have just said forget it I’ll flip burgers instead. I don’t think you need to rip their company from them, you just need to tax them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“I won’t start a company because it may be worth over a billion one day and that would only leave me with hundreds of millions of dollars. That doesn’t seem worthwhile,” thought no one ever in your hypothetical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

True. But generally I think giant companies cause more systemic problems than they solve. So maybe we don’t really need them.

After we die back to a manageable level from climate change we should try to remember that and prohibit it happening again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All these people already sell the stock of their own companies to diversify their holdings or to buy a yacht, island or Twitter.

Selling stock on the market to pay the tax man is no different.

They still keep a billion dollars worth of stock, so its not like they end up poor.

And the government can “forcefully” take a third of a working mans income, which is way worse than taxing wealth. Go cry me a river.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If the company becomes too successful, maybe there’s not just my effort that went into achieving that.

Somehow “you got paid, fuck off” is acceptable, but “you reaped the benefits, fuck off” is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There are loopholes that can be closed, but won’t because the majority of American politicians are also rich assholes. I do think most of the ideas that get bandied out are dumb as sin, however.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At a billion you get a small plaque that says ‘yay you won capitalism’, they name a park bench after you and you replay from scratch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I’d be willing to be taxed into oblivion if I knew it’d mean everyone else could lead full lives. And I make nothing.

Now imagine the good their excess wealth could do.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Fuck it, I’m willing to die if it came down to it to ensure the safety and prosperity of my countrymen. And I actually hate most of my countrymen.

If we ask and freely give such sacrifices from the working class, then asking the elite to stop hoarding gold like a dragon really shouldn’t be a big deal.

I do respect Warren Buffet for being honest about it. It’s up to us (the public) and the politicians who work for us to change the system to make it more fair.

There was also another billionaire who gave his money away and is no longer a billionaire. Mad respect for the guy, but he is a rare breed. We have to fix the system, not depend on charity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

their fair share is connected to their necks, but im sure we can figure out a way to get it off them

Death to America

permalink
report
reply

lets be reasonable here their fair share is all their stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

look, 10% off the top isn’t too much to ask

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lefty Memes

!leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don’t forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven’t considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such

That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the “anti-USA” flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of “Marxist”-“Leninists” seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML’s are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don’t just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention “Mantic Minotaur” when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people’s/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:
  • Racism
  • Sexism
  • Queerphobia
  • Ableism
  • Classism
  • Rape or assault
  • Genocide/ethnic cleansing or (mass) deportations
  • Fascism
  • (National) chauvinism
  • Orientalism
  • Colonialism or Imperialism (and their neo- counterparts)
  • Zionism
  • Religious fundamentalism of any kind

Community stats

  • 6.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 507

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments