Has the appearance of a transient ischemic attack. But apparently “he’s fine”

295 points

Wow. That does not look good.

Can we have some term limits, please?

permalink
report
reply
111 points

Can you imagine how many problems simple term limits would fix?

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Term limits empower lobbyists and career staffers and encourage legislators to give less of a shit about their constituents. I know “career politician” is often considered a dirty word, but having competent, knowledgeable elected officials is a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

They are already openly corrupt. Term limits would result in younger candidates in touch with this century. Lobbyists would also have to bribe new people. It might also break up the ridiculous 100% party voting.

Not to mention help with our Supreme Court problems. Randomly giving appointments that last decades to whoever is president in at the time is insane.

I really don’t think we have that many competent elected officials anyway.

Yes, eliminating gerrymandering and citizens united would be more effective, but I wouldn’t kick term limits out of bed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

On the other hand, the current system of “representatives spend one full year campaigning and one full year fundraising for their party, so any legislation they sponsor in their two-year term is already written by lobbyists” isn’t working out so hot either.

Throw in a law restricting campaigning more than three months before an election and a law limiting campaigns to only spending equally-dispersed public funds, and you might start to see some improvement. Oh, and reverse Citizen’s United and ban Super PACs while you’re at it. And can we all get a free unicorn too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

yeah, because the current batch of politicians are sooooo concerned with their constituents.

On the other hand, lets ignore the fact that the vast majority of senators (and the president, and most presidential canidates,) are so “experienced” that the majority of their experience predates… the internet. Never mind social media or anything resembling the modern world we find our selves in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There is definitely reasonable legislation that can have the best of both worlds here. That’s a poor argument against them

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I don’t think term limits will solve anything near what people pitching term limits as a panacea think they will solve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

People that pitch that as a catch-all solution have no idea how democracy works, they’re just understandably angry at the old white men who have ruined all our lives.

All term limits would do is make it middle aged white men ruining our lives.

Like, these people don’t seem to understand where politicians come from or how they get to be where they are.

Mitch McConnell is the Senator from Kentucky. Trump won that state both years by 60%. It hasn’t elected a Democratic Senator since 1992. In fact, that Democratic Senator retired, ya know, as old men should. Then a Republican took that seat.

So who do you think takes Mitch McConnell’s seat if we boot him out for old age? Does it matter who? We know what letter will be next to their name.

It’s the people. The problem is the people. And the structure of the Senate that gives them disproportionate power.

Also, look at the young Republicans like Madison Cawthorn and tell me they’re any better than their seniors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It will definitely solve some problems while causing arguably no new ones, I think that’s enough to push for something to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the tribe wont allow this

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Do you think Trump could have beaten Obama in 2016?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes. In fact, I believe Hillary would have beaten him without that idiotic final weekend FBI announcement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Dude went full Beaker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

I hope y’all remember this when you ask for Bernie Sanders geriatric ass again

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Bernie, Joe, and the other guy are all within 4 years of age with each other. Bernie is the only one in that group who’s decided NOT to run, so I’m not sure why you’re singling him out. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ Generally the opinion I’ve seen from his supporters is that he can do better from his current position and that his chance at the presidency has passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

When there’s only one politician of any consequence out there who represents your views…

permalink
report
parent
reply
259 points

Oh goodness, I hope it’s nothing minor.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

I generally don’t wish ill will on people. That being said, this asshole isn’t a human in my book. He’s just an evil hate filled pile of shit, and it will be a great day for democracy and America when he does die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I am not going to openly condemn anyone. That said, Mitch opens himself up to some interesting ethical questions.

Is it ok to sacrifice one man to save 300 hundred million?

How about to reduce the medium / long term risk to billions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is that man Mitch McConnell? Then hell yeah, this isn’t a trolley problem, it’s more of trolley party

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Fucking Kissinger. Wishing death upon that man makes you a better person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m convinced that McConnell is human, but an agent controlled by the Reptilians to destroy us from within. As evidence, I submit the nauseated look on his face most of the time. The real Mitch is still in there, and is horrified at the terrible things he’s forced to do. Obviously, this latest incident occurred because the radio signal to the control chip in his brain got disrupted.

Ted Cruz is the one who is not human. He’s their next attempt, a Reptilian in a (bad) human suit. As evidence, well, just look at him. Their later iterations have gotten a little better, like Taylor Greene, Bannon, and Boebert, but still firmly in the Uncanny Valley. Some of them are so convincingly human, though, that I’m not sure if they’re Reptilians in disguise, or some sort of latter-day Sonderkommando.

I have to believe this, because it’s the only way that the GQP makes any damn sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I want to be very clear: I will never support or condone violence. But when this parasite dies (from natural causes), the entire country will be massively better off for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

All violence is not equal. Unjustified and unprovoked violence is not the same as justified violence in self defense, for example. To say that one does not support violence is to paint with a very large brush and over important nuance and context

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I don’t believe self-defense is violence. For example, I believe Ukraine has every right to capture, injure, kill, and drive out all Russian invaders as they protect their country.

I get what you’re saying, but believe me: I understand how broad my brush is, yet I still don’t like violence. In my opinion some things are just black and white… 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Before you commit to that statement remember that peaceful protests work about 1% of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

I know it’s frustrating, but some things are more important than the end result. People who have to kill someone are often traumatized. For life. We weren’t built to destroy each other, and by doing so, we also lose some of our humanity…

If you go out and kill a murderer… the net total of murderers in the world remains the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I want to be very clear: I will never support or condone violence. But when this parasite dies (from natural causes), the entire country will be massively better off for it.

Why? Violence inflicted by pen is still violence. He’s killed thousands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
218 points
*

proof that old fuckers shouldn’t be allowed in politics due to a literally dysfunctioning brain

EDIT: to say ‘ageism is bigotry’ is a gross oversimplification. I’m not prejudiced against people above a certain age, I’m against the idea of allowing individuals with dementia or other degenerative conditions having political control over other people while literally having impeded brain functioning and judgement.

permalink
report
reply
97 points

His birth is closer to Lincoln’s assassination and the abolition of serfdom in Russia than to 2023.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I’ve had some relatives reach a very old age and this kind of thing is just part of the territory.

However my aged relatives were not in positions of great power. Neither should this man be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Feinstein and now McConnell. It shouldn’t be necessary but it’s now bipartisan proof that maybe we should force people of a certain age into retirement.

I’ll happily admit to being ageist. I don’t care. Once you hit the mid 70s (arguably earlier) you should be ordered to go the fuck home by Congress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

if it’s ageist to say that people can be too old to be in government, then it’s definitely ageist to say they can be too young, too.

Imagine having a toddler command the nuclear football. (oh wait. we already had that.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unfortunately, ageism in the US is only illegal against older adults. I really struggled with this when I was overseeing young volunteers, one of whom was being treated like crap just because he was young by the older people he was volunteering for. Totally legal for them to outright speak of his age as making him useless (and he was a good worker! and kind!). I was so angry that I couldn’t do much of anything to help him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t think it should necessarily be a hard age cap (which is illegal in the US, anyway), but I do think all politicians and judges should have to be able to pass cognitive function tests annually with absolutely no concerns raised by them. I’d require it probably as low as age 50 or 55, because dementia can come early.

And they should not be allowed to choose their own doctors for these exams. They should all see the same handful of doctors, randomly assigned each year, so as to reduce bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I find it interesting in the US that discriminating against the young is socially acceptable, while discriminating against the elderly is social suicide. Shows how much political power the Boomers wield.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The really annoying part is that I’ve seen people on the right already telling people to respect his health issues. Except when Biden stumbles over one word he should be removed from power and hospitalized for life. They don’t even pretend with the hypocrisy anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I worked in congress in 2002 after I graduated. The congressman I worked for was old to me then. I saw him on tv the other day and the guy looked one foot in the grave. I hadn’t thought about him in years and then I saw him and I’m like dude wtf why are you still working?! It’s shocking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is a reminder that Dianne Feinstein is still in office, too. She’s not even lucid anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

I live how you guys say this, while also demanding Bernie, a fucking dinosaur himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If there was another candidate who held the same values, but was of a younger age. I’d go for the younger one for sure.

It’s not Bernie because he’s amazing. It’s because he’s the best we got.

Same how I vote for x party, not because they are good. But because they are less bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points
*

Ageism, like all bigotry, is always wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We limit responsibility for youth, is that bigotry?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

No. Bigotry is when you assign a presumption to a group based on a completely unrelated parameter associated with that group. It would not be bigotry to limit the age of those serving in congress. It is bigotry to say that every old person’s brain doesn’t work.

“proof that old fuckers shouldn’t be allowed in politics due to a literally dysfunctioning brain”

permalink
report
parent
reply
170 points

Conservatives when Biden does something like walk the wrong direction: omg he’s senile and clearly has dementia!

Conservatives when McConnell (maybe) has a fucking legit seizure: everything’s fine, nothing to see here.

permalink
report
reply
96 points

Both of them need to get the hell out of politics as should anyone over the retirement age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Seriously. Enough with the septuagenarians and octogenarians in the government. If you’re going to drop dead from old age at any moment, you shouldn’t be in any government position, especially not a national/federal one, IMO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

How about hemberders? Or Tim Apple? Trump talks and walks like he’s have constant brain aneurism, yet not a single peep form his idiot base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Or covfefe. Or falling down a 5-degree decline. Or desperately gripping a bottle of water with two hands to carry it to his Queller Demon mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points
*

Tim Apple is intentional. It’s smart and effective. It communicates who he is talking about to people who have absolutely no clue who the CEO of Apple is. Simplified language like that is trump’s specialty because it works with his base.

Edit, well, looks like this is just as bad as reddit. Not sure what I expected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It absolutely was not intentional

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Regarding your edit - yes, completely made up bullshit also doesn’t fly here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Edit, well, looks like this is just as bad as reddit. Not sure what I expected.

Can you people just stop fucking whining? You made a dumb fucking comment and got downvoted for it. Its doesnt matter, its not the end of the world, you dont have to edit your comment to cry about the fact that people didnt agree with your extreme reach to defend a dumb comment Donald Trump made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Edit, well, looks like this is just as bad as reddit. Not sure what I expected.

Try truth social, that is where you will find your people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

I don’t believe that it’s discriminatory when I say that people with severe neurological disorders and dementia shouldn’t be making laws.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments