AI Summary:

Overview:

  • Mozilla is updating its new Terms of Use for Firefox due to criticism over unclear language about user data.
  • Original terms seemed to give Mozilla broad ownership of user data, causing concern.
  • Updated terms emphasize limited scope of data interaction, stating Mozilla only needs rights necessary to operate Firefox.
  • Mozilla acknowledges confusion and aims to clarify their intent to make Firefox work without owning user content.
  • Company explains they don’t make blanket claims of “never selling data” due to evolving legal definitions and obligations.
  • Mozilla collects and shares some data with partners to keep Firefox commercially viable, but ensures data is anonymized or shared in aggregate.
0 points
*

Is there a way to generate fake user activity data to feed to Firefox or stripped down versions of firefox ?
So that the data is useless for anyone buying it. Furthermore fake browsing data also messes up data collection by websites.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

maybe with anti-detection browser, there are with free-bee version, dont know if that will help . which basically lets you use proxies as well, and spoofs your fingerprinting. people who made of accts, or advertise on reddit uses these to evade reddit ban(until reddit made it harder to do so currently)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I found something but it is for chrome. https://github.com/Xodarap/Paranoid-Browsing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Probably easier to go into the settings and untick a box to disable any telemetry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

You’re probably just better going with a fork of FF that has all that nonsense stripped out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Too late for me personally, I’ve gone ahead and moved over to Zen.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Brodie thinks that they still left themselves some wiggle room for ““selling”” user data.

This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

Brodie thinks that they stiww weft themsewves some wiggwe woom fow ““sewwing”” uwsew data.

This modified version of your comment has been licensed under the GPLv3

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
25 points

Great, but a web browser still does not need terms of service. There’s no ongoing relationship between the user and the creator of the browser, at least, there shouldn’t be unless the user signs up for additional optional services.

It’s great if Mozilla wants to offer some optional services users can opt in to, and those services probably need terms. I use Firefox Sync, though I’ve started to reconsider that given the recent fuss. The browser itself? I’ll move to a fork first, and stop recommending Firefox to others.

permalink
report
reply
-16 points

Mozilla is soo stupid!

Most Firefox users use it only because of the values it upholds, and now they decided to destroy it. MF wouldn’t even have any any revenue once they betray their little existing users!

If they’re throwing away their values, then there is no reason to use Firefox anymore, BECAUSE OBJECTIVELY FIREFOX IS INFERIOR TO CHROMIUM.

And hopefully this accelerates development and support to fully alternate browsers.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

You’re not totally wrong here, but the fact is that these updates are a complete non-issue that has only resulted in so much backlash because of the self-selected Firefox audience of people who know enough about tech and privacy to care, but not enough to understand what’s actually threatening. The updates were a minor change in language that didn’t change the status quo, but idiots like the guy who thinks that incognito mode somehow stops a site from gathering information on you flock to these articles and start crying doomsday.

Mozilla is the only big web company that’s even close to on the side of consumers and it’s sad to see them eat shit for no reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Wait, you think using Firefox somehow results in them getting money?…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Yes, that’s why google is paying millions to be the default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

No, using Google makes Google money. That’s why they pay mozilla to be the default.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 20K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 615K

    Comments