Summary

Trump’s speech to Congress was a campaign-style tirade filled with falsehoods, personal grievances, and attacks on Democrats.

He exaggerated economic issues, blamed Biden for inflation, and misrepresented Social Security data. He renewed imperialist rhetoric about annexing Greenland and the Panama Canal while distorting U.S. aid figures to Ukraine.

Trump spent more time on culture war issues than policy, vowing to end “wokeness.” He also falsely claimed his legal troubles were political persecution.

Meanwhile, markets reeled from his new tariffs, which he dismissed. The speech showed deep partisan divides and his continued reliance on misinformation.

121 points

It’s so pathetic how the GOP members of Congress applaud every lie and absurdity Trump says. The GOP is completely lost.

permalink
report
reply
-22 points
*

As are the Democrats, which pretty much means the US political process is completely lost.

EDIT - Who do you turn to? It would appear that the CIA themselves have been subject to a far right coup, which is somewhat ironic, so I can’t see the intelligence services doing anything, but who do you turn to? The military? Is that where America is at?

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

This both-sides nonsense is so tiresome in the face of a fascist cult of personality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I do think there’s at least some validity to it. Both have issues for sure. But it’s starting to seem like putting a school bully and a mass murderer on the same level of shititude at this point. Both sides suck to an extent. Both sides absolutely don’t suck equally tho from my perspective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Was it a both sides thing? I read it more as since the Democrats are throwing very little opposition (holding up tiny little signs like Wile E Coyote before gravity kicks in? That’s it??) it’s game over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The lack of substantive opposition to Republicans for decades has been a big reason why they’ve been able to slide us into fascism. The sooner people like you wake up to this, the sooner we have a chance to actually do something about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This “democrats are the alternative” is just more bullshit. Sure, they’re not about the narcissistic cleptocracy, just about your run of the mill plutocracy. As if that’s any better.

At least the incompetency and recklessness of the current clown-in-chief might make it all blow up sooner rather than later, which to be honest, is probably the best outcome at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

Edited this post after one person upvoted it:

You are note dealing with reality.

The Democrats have helped construct the explicit oligarchy that is unfolding before your eyes.

It absolutely is about both sides, given both of them are responsible for the current situation. Or it is about the fact that there is only one side: pretty far right neo-liberal corporatists, or fascist far right oligarchy.

And obviously it matters if your only hope is to turn to the other side who are going to prove themselves to be utterly ineffectual. The choice being Trump, or a continuation of the economic-political ideology that made Trump (or similar) inevitable.

But looking at the amount of up/downvotes these two posts have got I guess it doesn’t matter - maybe most of you just aren’t ready to deal with reality, so reality will just happen to you. Trying to downvote it away is what has led you to this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

I watched it for about 30 seconds. I couldn’t stand hearing his lies and disgusting face.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Same - just as I started watching he was saying the democrats had weaponised law enforcement against their political opponents, on the day that said he would crack down on political opponents in universities. (I know he’s abusing law enforcement in many other ways - it just struck me that the that the university protest crack down was one of the big stories of the day. Such a stark example of “every accusation is a confession”)

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

He objectively has a really whiny voice. It’s just so high pitched and so shreeky.

I just can’t listen to it at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Like nails on a chalkboard or metal scraping on metal. Barf

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

He renewed imperialist rhetoric about annexing Greenland and the Panama Canal while distorting U.S. aid figures to Ukraine.

What I heard him actually say would normally get most Presidents impeached.

This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
reply
24 points

He specifically called Mexico’s government illegitimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Regarding Greenland > No is an answer. No explanation needed from DK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Trump is very good at not seeking consent and ignoring limits. Just ask E Jean Carroll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I mean he could invade it. And he could take it no issue. Not like we Danes could stand up to the US Army. But if he does invade then the US would quickly become a pariah state.

China would jump for joy at the chance to cripple their biggest geopolitical rival. They would push for sanctions on the US. The EU would probably back them to show solidarity for a member state. Canada and Mexico are already irate with the US so they wouldn’t take a lot of convincing to join. Especially Canada as this would signal they could be next. The economic woes the US is experiencing right now would look like a joke compared to what would happen in that scenario.

Would also spell the end of NATO most likely. Unless the other members decide to stick around without the US. Russia would probably declare the day a National Holiday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, and continue?

No, and voted out of office?

No, and arrested for treason endangering the US by trying to instigate multiple trade and military wars?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In a sea of disgusting lies and undeserved co-option of others’ achievements, his comments on ‘reclaiming the Panama Canal’ and ‘Taking Greenland one way or another’ were particularly atrocious. Did this motherfucker say on live television that the United States is going to claim the sovereign territory of other nations!?!?!? Why the brainmelting fuck did Republicans clap!?!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Did this motherfucker say on live television that the United States is going to claim the sovereign territory of other nations!?!?!? Why the brainmelting fuck did Republicans clap!?!?

He did, and thats important.

But also remember, he likes to throw out red meat for the news/population to feast on, to distract.

Be sure to pay attention to what he does, moreso than what he says.

This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

He’s a narcissistic toddler. What do you expect?

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Calling him a toddler is dangerous. It diminishes the impact of his actions.

He’s a Russian puppet, installed to destroy our country, and that’s exactly what he’s doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Enough parents in the US have been shot by their toddlers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Enough parents in the US have been shot by their toddlers.

Not enough to keep it from happening though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As a Texan, I’m painfully aware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I say that cause that’s his maturity level. It’s pathetic and down right embarassing for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d expect the adults in the room, the US population, to stand up and smack his ass down.

But apparently that’s too much to ask, so he continues to get away with everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

If only we could have seen this coming

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments