63 points

Ground news is pretty dope and the only people hating on it seem to be the people that have never used it, but thinks that it’s automatically bad because of the whole left/right thing.

It’s still a place to consume a large amount of news very quickly and at a glance you can see if one side isn’t reporting on something or if they are reporting on it using very different language or focusing on different aspects on the topic.

Nothing will ever be perfect, but as the saying goes the enemy of perfect is good.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Does ground news cover articles from sources that aren’t aligned with the false left-right dichotomy? Does it cover these sources without assigning them arbitrary conservative and liberal percentage numbers when the source may be aligned with a different ideology?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ll just save you the trouble. Ground news probably isn’t for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I’ll save everyone the trouble. If you want unbiased news, Ground News is not for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
2 points

Yeah… I have a rule that I don’t take any advice from Australians ever.

They lost a war to some overgrown chickens for fuck sake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So you don’t have any actual counter points to the very good points Friendly Jordies made about your favourite platform? Convince me, I’m on the fence about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I’ve tried it and I absolutely do not trust it.

And them covering left and right is part of it, yes. It works with made up American definitions of left and right, in which centrists to moderate rights are put on the left. As a result, international coverage is normally represented as left-biased, while really, Ground News and a broader American political landscape is right-biased. This is not a fair coverage and it and it doesn’t allow you to break through the propaganda.

Overall, concept is good, but if you follow this and think you are well-balanced and informed, you are not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t understand why someone would hate that they show both sides? Like, I’m not a centrist or right winger by any means, but it’s good to get out of the echo chamber sometimes. Everyone needs to be more critical of the media they consume and realize that not everyone thinks the same way they do. I don’t agree with the way the right reports on things, but I want to at least know what I’m not hearing that other people are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I haven’t used it, mainly because I suspect they’re very caught up in the political landscape of the US. I don’t know what to do with a scale that only goes from “you may have some civil liberties as a treat, but only if they don’t affect stock prices” to “if you’re not a rich white hetero man I don’t care if you live or die”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s a very healthy mindset to have. Too many people happily lock themselves into many bubbles/echo chambers and they lose all perspective. Just because you discuss topics with people doesn’tean you have to agree with them. It’s still important to know what other views exist out there.

I wish more people were like you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If more people read more news sources, we wouldn’t still have people spouting that “transgenic/transgender” mixup

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

You forgot to mention that your personal favorite feature is the blind spot feature so I suspect you weren’t paid for saying this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

What if I was paid and this was actually just 4d chess guerilla marketing?

JK I wish I was getting paid to say shit like that.

Shit I would do an ad read for the Taliban if it would get me outta financial prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you even use the blind spot feature? Is it as mind blowing as all the youtubers keep telling me?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

The most hilarious part is that Ground News tries to present itself as “unbiased” by covering news from “left” and “right”, but it does so from a US perspective, so almost all international sources are considered “left”.

They are not left, it’s you who is right, lol.

Which, BTW, highlights the broader issue of American politics, which is that people were honestly made to believe moderate right is the center, or even left. It is not.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

You’re 100% correct. It is considered unbiased in the US because where they put the center line is based on a US customer base.

My friends considered me to be far left, but in any other country I think I would be considered center left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Our Overton window has been sprinting right for 40 years at least. Our left wing is now just conservatives that don’t hate people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I only get all my news and current events from Raid shadow legends! Or the Hoyoverse whatever the fuck that is.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

From what I understand it’s like the Metaverse but with sexualized underage anime characters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I thought that was the metaverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Okay fine, the Metaverse with more sexualized underage anime characters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I get my news audibly through Raycons

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I get mine through the team chat of War Thunder! Enter the code TRTHMNSTRY and receive the special ammo full of facts to shoot straight into your enemies’ face!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

By «news» do you mean detailed and confidential schematics for random vehicles and weapons never seen before???

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m too busy slamming AG1 to consume news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

An officoanado of the Cody showdy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I mean, of the possible sponsors out there, Ground News is pretty alright. I don’t particularly need another subscription, but it seems like a valuable enough service

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

It doesn’t provide any real benefit other than letting you know whether a news site is “left” or “right” leaning. Which is a massive false dichotomy used to divide people.

I prefer objective truth myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Where is your source of objective truth?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The original source. Be it scientific white papers, court filings, executive orders, the actual text of bills submitted in the house and senate. Etc, etc.

You just have to put in the effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I wait for it to become so important that it ends up in the meme and shitpost communities.

Back in the day my primary source of news was World of Warcraft. If it was important enough to matter it would show up in the game. If it wasn’t any way inconsequential I never heard of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

snopes or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s also very usable even without the subscription and doesn’t have (its own) ads. Just use ad block if you want to actually read any of the articles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You watched the Benn Jordan video too huh?

permalink
report
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 4K

    Posts

  • 97K

    Comments