82 points

I guess that’s better but honestly not by much.

See that guy between Bezos and Musk at the Trump inauguration? That’s Sundar Pichai, Alphabet/Google CEO.

permalink
report
reply
51 points
*

It’s zero better. Every one and every thing that bends the knee to fascism is fascist, and should be treated the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

If I were forced to pick between the two I’d take the guy who is only a white supremacist when it’s profitable over the guy who is a white supremacist every waking moment.

Call it 1% better, if that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Still a ratfucker, but … not as high a priority target as the one activly throwing out nazi salutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sure, for the list of executions at the Hague Musk should take priority, but you shouldn’t buy products from any fascist. The difference between 99% fascist and 90% fascist is inconsequential.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’m not an apologist for any US company, particularly Google. But they are not the same as Musk. They didn’t campaign for this. Yes, they’ve “bent the knee” if you will, donated, and attended the innaguration. Can you imagine the alternative? The threats they got? Suddenly all these top tech companies donated exactly 1 million and their CEOs showed up there. Pretty sure they were told this was the bare minimum donation and that if they didn’t show up, you know…

Plus, they are not throwing nazi salutes, promoting nazis online and offline, or actively dismantling the US democracy. If anything, them not standing out and keeping as low a profile as possible is a good thing because they still hold significant power (for now) and the alternative is the US admin criminalizing them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Zuck looks like he’s glitching and needs a hard reset

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s his natural state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s worse. Right now, people see the fascism in front of their eyes. They can choose to wake up or remain delusional. Before, it was masked and the average Joe wouldn’t know better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points
*

Yay, more space junk, and knowing Google they would abandon the whole thing a couple years in when it gets boring and leave them to rot.

Edit:not actually sat, which makes it weird to call a ‘starlink competitor’ then, but I don’t write the headlines.

permalink
report
reply
46 points
  • They split off from Google.

  • They are not using satellites, they shine a lazer from one fixed tower to another, with range about 20 km.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Ah, see that’s where not reading is a problem. Just saw star link competitor and remembered something a recently about China looking to launch a similar system.

Odd they would phrase it as a ‘starlink competitor’ then though rather than ‘a new ISP bid’. Wireless systems with directional antenna relays are not really new, not sure if any use laser particularly but the concept is essentially the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Still raking in the upvotes though! Reading is for suckers!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah back in 2005 I lived in a house that used that. We were on the very edge of it range so a strong gust of wind could knock the internet down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That sounds similar to WiMax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yup. Now we have long-range WiFi filling that niche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

At sufficiently low orbits, the satellites would simply deorbit themselves because of the atmospheric drag. Several Starlink sats have been lost this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, more thinking the wasted time, resources, and emissions involved in building, launching, managing, and then whenever makes it down.

Take all that and make something useful instead, whatever happened to Google fiber being built out all over? More reliable, faster, doesn’t involve sending piles of redundant satellites into space…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Supposedly traditional ISP’s have tons and tons of lawyers and filed every single step of the way to stop Google from intruding on their local monopolies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think the existing telecoms tied them up in mountains of legal bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wasn’t starlink damaging the ozone layer as well?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When they say “burn up on reentry” they don’t mean disintegrate, they mean burn. It’s exactly like throwing thousands of home entertainment systems in a fire except that the pollution is in the upper atmosphere where normal pollution doesn’t reach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know about the ozone layer specifically, but reentry turns the satellite into danger dust – mostly metal oxides and burnt polymers. Ozone, being a very strong oxidizer, is the most likely to react with the hot debris, so it probably does damage the ozone layer, but I can’t quantify the damage, or the released pollutants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was more they’re worried it would, because of the sheer scale of metallic satellites that would be burning up in the upper atmosphere

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Completely destroying space and satellite communication might actually be for the best… maybe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not if you’re in a place that relies on satellite infrastructure, such as places conventional telephony doesn’t work in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was just joking and thinking much more apopalytic than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No even there it’s ok

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

ok cool, whos gonna buy that? Europe wants to be independent from US big tech, elon got the US gov by the balls and china surely has their own thing.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Its not for people to buy. Companies like Google simply don’t need to make profit anymore.

Its to show growth potential to investors. And when they inevitably cut the program, it will also show growth potential to investors since then it will be millions of dollars saved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s different tech that doesn’t suffer from starlink’s latency issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Im very much open to replacing my Starlink - but this isn’t it. Land based lasers are just going to be attached to things called cell towers - and if I have one of those nearby… then I’d use cellular.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The tech sounds useful to bridge cell towers in rural areas among each other to skip satellites and laying cables.

Back when I was still in university, dormatories’ internet was established using a similar tech to the main campus. It was great, except on snowy days. Then there was just no internet at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That sounds like a major drawback. I guess it’s still better than nothing tho. Did rain cause issues as well?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think so. Cannot remember that it did. Fog did though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Might have been microwave link. We had those as part of our disaster recovery at a few places I worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s still longer distance than cellular and it can get even better. Cell towers will always win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

At least it’s not more low orbit space junk

permalink
report
reply
2 points

yeah I would do this if it worked over starlink provided it gave as good or better connection.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 21K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 626K

    Comments