Summary

Jon Stewart slammed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for supporting a GOP funding bill after initially opposing it.

On The Daily Show, Stewart mocked Schumer for surrendering leverage without gaining anything in return, joking that he “got some cheese.”

He criticized Schumer’s strategy of waiting for Trump’s popularity to drop, calling it delusional.

Stewart argued Democrats avoid proposing real alternatives by pretending Republicans will compromise. He warned their approval rating is dangerously low, making their approach politically ineffective and out of touch.

142 points
*

Jon Stewart slammed

I mean, this was actually on-point. it was pretty vicious, and deservedly so.

Jon Stewart Knocks Dems’ Lack of Vision In Countering The Trump Agenda | The Daily Show

sorry for the YouTube link, could not find it elsewhere.

edit: CW - animated intense mortal kombat violence at the very, very end of the video. the daily show was not playing around on this one.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Thanks for the link. Well worth the watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

so when do we start calling them “schumer” cocktails?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Cucktails oooh ooooh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points
*

Highly paid, neo-liberal consultants that lost them multiple elections told Democratic leadership to become more Republican and that’s just what the Democratic leadership did by voting with Republicans.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Politicians kept those fucks on

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It’s almost like they’d rather continue to talk to consultants than their own constituents post-Hilary and when your ideas are only to position yourself against the other guy, well you don’t have very many ideas at all. At least you still get to feel morally superior and continue building your own careerist resume. Democratic leadership don’t care about anyone but themselves and it shows. These people don’t work for you.

https://youtu.be/5Gq16RO2XB0

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

told Vichy Democratsic leadership to become more Republican

FTFY!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Last time I checked in with Jon Stewart he was still refusing to call these dudes fascists, is that still the case?

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

Oh fuck here we go I fucking called it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sorry, I forgot that with enough enlightened centrism we could all shove our heads so far up our butts thst nobody could see fascism. I’ll keep trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

No you’re right, what we need to do is be hyper critical of different views and opinions. This way we can continue to build up this understanding that no one who stands up to speak against the right is safe.

We need to attack all the time in all directions like a narcissistic mother trying to find fault regardless of the situation at hand. Go at Bill Burr next. That uppity mother fucker has been shitting on Elon and billionaires. You need to go out there and find a reason he sucks next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

wasnt he also wierd around the gaza/conflict to, he wasnt denouncing them, he was low-key supporting them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“these dudes”? I have no idea who you’re even talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nearly ever US politician

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Hey uncle fart wafers. this is how you get opened up to Libel suits is that what you want for John Stewart him caught in the court for the rest of his life

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Lol!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, a month ago he was saying dems should stop overreacting. Now he’s saying they’re capitulating. Never once attacking Trump for his fascist coup cause Paramount is being sued by the government. No mention of the attack on the 1st ammendment in any of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

It’s a uniparty and it’s not there to help you, prole.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I think there are actual elected Democrats who want to oppose the fascists. Look at Bernie, AOC, Crockett, even Pritzker and Walz. Hell, even Seth fucking Moulton and Nancy fucking Pelosi criticized Vichy Schumer over his collaboration and capitulation.

The problem is the Democrats, at the national level, are all led by the Vichy caucus of the party. Schumer, Jeffries, Newsom, etc who actually agree with the fascists on a number of issues.

We can’t write off everyone elected with a (D) next to their name. History has shown us time and time again that the only thing that has ever defeated a powerful fascists movement is a popular front of leftists and liberals working together. We need to eliminate the Vichy wing of the Democratic Party. I’m not going to pretend like I know how to do that, but we’re never going to defeat the fascists if we keep lumping everyone in with the collaborationists. That just fractures our side and strengthens theirs.

And electoral politics can’t be the only thing we do. It’s one tactic, but it’s not the only or even most important one. Most importantly, we need to build connections and networks within our communities so that we can support each other against the fascists. We need to establish the relationships now so that when the fascists come for the marginalized in our community people (especially those less engaged with politics) are more willing to side with the victims of the fascists who they’ve come to know against the power structures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think there are actual elected Democrats who want to oppose the fascists

Starts the list with someone who isn’t a Democrat

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Here’s a notarized letter signed by Bernie affirming he is, in fact, a Democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 572K

    Comments