7 points

Can someone tell whoever is leading this project to go with EurOS? Please? Such a missed opportunity.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
5 points

I think you are clumping together things that are not really quite in the same category.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s odd that they want to go with the American based Fedora instead of the German based openSUSE. Only thing I can figure is that this is yet another case of European Tech infighting?

The Register should get ahold of Robert Riemann and ask them.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It could be due to them liking Fedora better. We don’t need to kick off more distro wars over something that probably won’t affect most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sure but if the intent is to get away from American software companies, specifically Microsoft for Desktop OS, then why would you run Fedora when SUSE is literally right there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Maybe they weighted the options and choose Fedora?

Fedora is a community project

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Or just license SUSE Linux and you get all the professional support you need. I don’t understand why they’d want to roll their own thing when a European solution that ticks all the boxes exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Licensing SUSE would cost money and this guy wouldn’t end up in charge of it. If I was SUSE I’d run around offering EU Government entities, and I mean all of them right down to a town council, seriously steep discounts on licensing and simultaneously create an entire team tasked with supporting new government users.

Hell if there were any European Venture Capitalists they should be lining up around the block to invest in SUSE doing just that. Investing 10 Billion in SUSE to do that now could return 100 Billion or more in just a decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep, was thinking the same thing. Was a Fedora user that migrated to Tumbleweed. Very satisfied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Basing this on Fedora doesn’t make sense. It tells me the private individual behind this proposal hasn’t done an extensive analysis on this.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Why wouldn’t they use Fedora? Last time I checked they are paving the way from a security and quality perspective. The Fedora team does excellent work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because it’s run by Americans.

We’re way past ‘Not all Americans’ now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s a US based project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, however it is still a community lead project with a focus on foss.

It is a good organization for the most part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
6 points

Chromium OS isn’t really a viable desktop OS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They need a desktop for what? Open files with applications?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Under what means? The target is public sector and the OS to replace (Windows 10, Windows 11) would be a relatively compatible release target. Fedora is a competent leading edge (Wayland, Pipewire, BTRFS) distro that runs as a 6 month point release. I wouldn’t see many reasons to not go with Fedora Workstation as a base unless going for an immutable base or a different core distro (OpenSUSE or Debian mainly).

EDIT: Missed that this is going to be immutabe, so it is likely being based on Fedora Kinoite, meaning there really aren’t many alternatives besides OpenSUSE’s offerings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fedora Kinoite is the immutable KDE variant. It will definitely be ostree based and likely will be something that leverages rpm-ostree. The other option would be bootable containers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

If you want “everyone” on board I’d take Mint. It just works and, for what I know, has no specific bad side effects.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly they could build there own version of Mint based on Fedora. The Cinnamon desktop is fairly portable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mint is not even among the top 10 to choose as a base distro for a government agency or any company.

It’s good for the general public

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

The European public sector could choose any stable Linux distro, with any DE. Now, somebody proposed a branded “EU OS” so you know what the non-techies in charge are going to go for.

Pardon my cynicism, but to me that branding seems opportunist and suspicious in itself. Let the suits at least ask their sysadmins what would be the better setup.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Their setup should be on some wiki repository if they work the way they’re supposed to.

The article states that ChromiumOS doesn’t qualify – and neither do ChromeOS Flex or FydeOS

I’m sure it does actually

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you’re a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we’re excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let’s dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 8.1K

    Comments

Community moderators