Two children were found locked inside a barn in West Virginia without any running water or bathroom facilities and their adoptive parents are now facing felony child neglect charges, the Kanawha County Sheriff’s Office says.
An investigation was launched Monday just before 6 p.m. after authorities received a 911 call regarding the welfare of the children, according to a news release from the sheriff’s office.
A sheriff’s deputy went to the barn in Sissonville and forced her way inside to find a boy and girl in the 20-foot by 14-foot room, the release said.
The children were locked inside without access to water, a bathroom, food or adequate hygienic care items, authorities said. At the main residence, another small child was found locked inside alone, the release stated.
Native speakers of the English language: By reading the headline did you know exactly who was locked in the barn? And if yes, tell me, a non native speaker, by which rule do I have to read headlines like this to not be totally confused. (I thought the parents were the ones who got locked until I read the headline a third time.)
Edit: Thank you for all the input and thoughts
It’s talking about the children because there’s no break
The adoptive parents of two children, found locked
Or
The adoptive parents of two children were found locked
Would mean it’s about the parents being locked up.
But be cause “found locked” comes immediately after “two children” we know the children are the subject.
English is nutty, most native speakers can’t explain the rules, because we just do it instinctively at this point. It’s a mismatch of a bunch of languages so it’s also a mismatch of different sets of rules.
I am a native speaker and I think it could’ve been clearer, but I did know who was locked in. To me it read like this “The adoptive parents of (the of completely separating it) two kids found locked in a barn…” I don’t know the rule or anything, but on glance the of cut the sentence in 2 for me making the barn modifier apply to the children. It might also just be entirely grammatically incorrect too lol
I don’t tend to agree. A similar sentence could be; “Owner of Maserati found drunk in river charged with disorderly conduct.” Similar structure but less confusing because the Maserati can’t be drunk so the statement re charges must relate to the owner. In the present headline the “locked in barn” could equally relate to both parents or children, it is only the fact that child negligence is mentioned that you can surmise that the kids were the ones locked in. Grammatically, the sentence could be better as I write above.
It’s compact because it’s a headline.
You can’t tell who was locked in the barn from first part of the headline but when you read the bit about them being charged it can only refer to the parents, so the “locked in a barn” bit must be describing the kids and not the parents.
0 days
This guy saw the arrest coming.
Probably voted for Bernie, fucking socialists
/s
Am I out of the loop on something? Did a Bernie supporter do something similarly before? The article doesn’t touch on politics.
I think part of the confusion is there isn’t any context that would set up for someone equating them to a fans of Bernie under the guise of someone with contrary political beliefs, as a meansof deriding those with that contrary belief.
The whole thing just kind of comes straight out of left field.
