Not sure if appropriate for this community, or for !programming_horror@programming.dev.
I still don’t understand why programmers are forced to use a specific tool, to write apps for a specific ecosystem.
i.e. writing a Flutter mobile app for Android and iOS. You can do everything in VSCode for the Android part incl. the apk-build.
But for iOS you’re forced to use Xcode for implementing certain things like permissions, build and upload.
Nothing but headaches.
But for iOS you’re forced to use Xcode for implementing certain things like permissions, build and upload.
You can do all that via VSCode as well if you so desire.
Permissions, configurations, etc. are essentially all just XML files and can be edited as such, building, running in simulator and uploading can all be done via CLI.
And if you’re not comfortable doing it via the terminal in VSCode, you can also find some extensions.
Personally as a native dev I don’t know why you’d want to of course, but to each their own.
I wouldn’t mind being locked into Xcode if Apple would beef it up and make it better.
After a decade as a Java (and Kotlin) dev I recently got to work on an iOS app. The transition from Jetbrains products to Xcode has been painful, to say the least.
I tried appcode before it was retired, and it was a much better experience all around. I can’t understand why Apple insists on maintaining this pile of crap instead of working with JB like Google.
I think you might be misunderstanding what this does.
You did a search for symbol references that contain “User” ignoring cases.
When you do a search for symbol references this way, Xcode will return two things:
- A declaration of all the symbols containing “User” and/or some context surrounding the symbol (ignoring Case)
- Show any places where your code references the symbol
And it did just that.
The first three .swift files show references to symbols that contain “User”.
The forth one, User.swift, is in and of itself a symbol that matches the query and has symbols inside itself.
The last one UserViewModel.swift is in itself a symbol as well and all the parts that are nested within that you’ve annotated with underscores and question marks, serve to give you context about the symbol “UserViewModel”, hence the ellipses.
It’s essentially telling you “Hey I’ve found this symbol UserViewModel, it starts with a var named username, has a bunch of stuff following that (i.e. …) then has an extension, then some more stuff (i.e. …) and then ends”.
Without knowing what’s inside UserViewModel.swift I can’t tell if it goofed with giving you a typical declaration, but that doesn’t change the fact that its trying to give you context about a valid search result, the symbol UserViewModel, so that you can figure out if that’s the one you’re looking for.
Keep in mind that variables are considered symbols as well, but in this instance I don’t think that’s what happened here, otherwise it would’ve been marked with a P instead of a C.
If this is not desired behavior then I suggest you switch from “Containing” to “Matching Word” or instead consider using the search bar at the bottom of the Symbol Navigator.
Another option, if you’re searching while going through code, is to right click on the symbol in your code and click Find > Find Selected Symbol in Workspace.
Lastly it might be an idea to go over the Xcode documentation as a refresher. This would be a good starting point.
That said, Apple clearly feels that things can be improved by clarifying, because in the current Xcode beta they’ve changed the option label from References to Symbols (and added a few more options).
I’ll be the first to admit that I am certainly no Xcode expert. So thank you for taking the time to explain how the reference/symbols search works.
Another option, if you’re searching while going through code, is to right click on the symbol in your code and click Find > Find Selected Symbol in Workspace.
Funny enough, that’s what I did. Everything in the search window is what was selected by default in Xcode; probably why I was confused. I still contend it’s not intuitive.
I see the blank lines being included is odd, is that it? Why are the other lines being underlined?
Because two of them are strings, and one is a declaration of an extension. None of which are of type User.
All you searched was “User”, ignoring case. You didn’t search the type of user, so it correctly returned lines with “user” in it like “private var username”
If what you’re saying is true, that’s an even more WTF because I’m searching for User references, and not the text “[Uu]ser”.
