157 points
*

“On Sept. 29, Dianne Feinstein, 90, died of natural causes. She had cast a vote in the Senate less than a day prior.”

Banger first two sentences. As an observer not from the US, this feels like Emperors New Clothes to me. But instead of a naked emperor, you have paraded a corpse through the senate and acted as if she was a fighter like Xena, Warrior Princess or something.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

As a Californian, I’ll say its been feeling damn near “Weekend and Bernie’s” for months now.

I dunno who was actually casting her votes, but I doubt they were aligned with what the people of my state would have wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Weekend at Bernie’s. The film, not Sanders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

I honestly think there are now a few of those “Weekend at Bernie’s” scenarios playing out in congress. McConnell comes to mind as the most obvious, he has already had a couple of public examples of him losing his cognitive abilities, but everyone pretends not to notice and they keep tripping over themselves trying to cover for him, similar to how they did with Feinstein.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I am not allowed to say hateful things here I think, but man I really hope McConnell lives a long life. He seems to be in perfect health and enjoys living by the looks of it, and I want that joy to continue for him as long as possible :) :) :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And the rest of the establishment’s politicians seem undead. :-/

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We need to stop allowing folks to remain in power after the age of like 65.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I am in favour of both age and term limits for politicians. For one, if regular people are supposed to retire at 65ish and realistically often struggle to find work once they go past their 40s, there is no reason why politicians should be allowed to stay in their jobs through their 70s and sometimes 80s.

And I am in favour of term limits because it would keep the career politicians out of the game. Very few of them are any good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Politicians who know that their political career is about to end have the nasty habit of doing favors for their big corporation of choice, knowing that they’ll receive a cushy board position in return afterwards.

If you want to establish term limits, you also need to establish some sort of accountability for the time afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree that we need younger people in these positions. We need those more in touch with what the average person is going through these days.

However, I disagree that we should set a hard age limit. If anything have them take some sort of cognitive exam every few years once they hit a certain age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You need an impartial hard limit. Otherwise you get people like trump getting doctors to lie about their health. Sorry if you’re in good health and get the boot, but you knew what the limits were when you signed on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A cognitive exam would be a good idea regardless of any age. They need to be fit to serve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Natural causes my ass. Cunt had dementia and they kept her around for power ever one of her votes for the last 3 years should be invalidated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Dementia would still be considered natural causes wouldn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Not if it’s magical dementia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Anything not an accident or homicide is natural causes when you are 90.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Reagan “governed” with Alzheimer’s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And astrology!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

for power ever one of her votes for the last 3 years should be invalidated.

I think you missed one letter and a dot there.

Are we at stage “invalidating votes of senile old coots” yet? Have you SEEN how many crusty bastards are in there? I’d say the Dems would LOVE this as the demographic helps them immensely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Something awful must have happened to you as a child to refer to an old lady you’ve never met that way. IDGAF about politics. Have some respect for your damned self.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No reason to respect anyone who hasn’t earned that respect. Age has nothing to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

It’s been bizarre watching everyone claim she’s a senile old bat who should’ve stepped down decades ago, to hearing everyone praise how devoted she was. It’s been a very disappointing journey for sure, the stuff of “boring dystopia” posts.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

It’s an old etiquette thing about not speaking ill of someone but present to defend themselves. There are exceptions, imo, but I’m not Emily Post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I spoke ill of her while she was still alive. I promise not to make any new arguments, as that would be unfair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I clearly said I’m not in agreement, but do you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Memorials would not be very pleasant if we only remembered people as they were in their final days

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Memorials would be very uncomfortable if people told the truth instead of pufffing eachother up with hot hair and bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We are gathered here today to remember all the ways grandma was kind of a bitch

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think being a public figure that put her position ahead of the needs of the public she supposedly served gives her an exemption from the “peaceful words for the dead rule”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

She was a piece of shit the whole time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Lest we forget she was a consummate centrist.

We should remember her for her actions through her career as a politician. Where she stood on equality, lgbtq+ rights, the death penalty, government surveillance… How she used her position in the Senate to enrich herself through means not allowed by commoners.

There are a lot of shit bags in government. And one less doesn’t change that. But let’s not paint her as a champion of anything but herself just because she’s dead.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

This sounds like some Ruth Bader Ginsberg shit.

You can’t criticize someone now that they’re dead despite wanting to cling to power over pride and legacy!

Yes, yes we can. And anyone who enabled that shit should take a good hard look into themselves and get the fuck out of politics.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Holy shit. What a takedown. With receipts.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 463K

    Comments