I’ve seen a video from CTT demonstrating the <10 performance boosts by simply off the mitigation. The system will be secure for personal use as before.

47 points

Ask yourself: do you really need a performance boost or are you just chasing the numbers to avoid a non-existant problem?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yea

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Everything is secure until it isn’t. I’d leave it on.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The short answer, as a ton of people already said in the comments of the video, is “hell no” it is not and it is most likely also not worth it. Back when the video came out I tested it (with unplugged network) on my system and the performance gain was ~1% which I’d consider well within the margin of error

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Mines about 60% faster, ymmv

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What workload makes that much of a difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Games on a 3rd gen i7

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aren’t you the guy who runs one of the largest RuneScape private servers? Why tf are you disabling security measures

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Isolated machine for emulating old consoles

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The system will be secure for personal use as before.

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. CPU side channels allow data to be leaked across security contexts. For example, from a user process to sandboxed JavaScript in a browser, from kernel space to user space, or from one containerized process to another. This is a problem even on a single user system without any VMs.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Many years ago when I was still doing my undergrad I had a cyber security prof talk about side channels:

”There’s no way to prevent side-channels. As long as two components are sharing the same physical resource there will be side channels. The only problem is that these side channels are leaking way more bits than we expected.”

So the question here is how big does the side channel need to be to leak something sensitive from memory? Turning off mitigations will almost certainly lead to larger side channels. Whether that is worth the risk is up to you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

…or you could opt for other ways to improve your PC performance. For instance, using equal values for both scaling_max_freq and scaling_min_freq gives you a quite considerable performance boost at the expense of (almost) nothing.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Well, you lose a lot of power efficiency, this would be massively detrimental to many peoples experiences if you do this on anything battery powered like a laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Eh…I see your point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

And does this still work with modern cpufreq schedulers like amd-pstate and the Intel equivalent? IIRC I couldn’t simply set frequencies or select the userspace scheduler on 10th gen Intel and frequencies don’t seem to be honoured by AMD pstate drivers on Zen4.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 8.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.3K

    Posts

  • 172K

    Comments