Only 7 years out of date, nice
@newIdentity @I_Clean_Here because #DigitalstandortDeutschland and #Neuland
Crazy, how such a small time when germany was divided had such a large effect. The Soviets knew how to shape a people, I give them that.
I would see it the other way around. It shows that religion is nothing natural and as soon as churches aren’t actively allowed to indoctrinate children for one generation religious influence is massively reduced.
Although the GDR regime actively surpressed the church and religion and the churches were actually a place of resistance. E.g. the only place where punk bands could play. The church in the GDR tried to not publically oppose the regime, but helped out people who were.
I am not religious, but the church in the GDR went beyond being a religious institution.
Well if they went beyond bring a religious institution than religion wasn’t the thing that solved it.
People always mention churches going above and beyond and acting like charities and I’m ok with the charity but why did u need the religion being involved? By merging it with concepts like charity all it does it is allow it to spread easier and thus that spreads the worse parts of religion that are baked into all religions that i can think of from the top of my head.
Not sure how that is relevant to explain the large percentage of the population there who isn’t religious. If anything the effect of the actions you describe was probably slightly in favour of the church membership numbers.
Why such a way outdated source?
Im glad atheist numbers are growing. All religions are cancers. I dont care what you believe, but keep it to yourself.
You do realize that the “non religious” does not mean atheist, but also includes agnostics?
Also if you look at the map you can see that the non religiousness is primarily caused by the socialist government in former east Germany not being too kind of any religion. You can even see the divide in East and West-Berlin. At the same time there is many people that are registered as protestants or catholics even though they don’t feel religious. This map does not help to see such a development.
Agnostics generally don’t want to force their beliefs on others though. They won’t go against established science to oppose abortion, they won’t advocate for laws against blasphemy, they won’t usually oppose the rights of non traditional families. So agnostic is already a big win in my book.
Most moderate christians in Germany dont do any of these either.
Heck we had a catholic priest sue against the fascist party AfD for some of their posters being hate speech against trans people and drag artists. Article in German:
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/muenchen-drag-lesung-strafanzeige-afd-1.5921390?reduced=true
If we’re going into details, then most agnostics are part of the atheist-umbrella.
Gnosticism refers to knowledge, Theism refers to belief.
Someone who says “it’s unknowable if god exists” and doesn’t actively belief (or withholds judgement) in a god is an agnostic atheist. Someone who says it’s unknowable but beliefs anyway is an agnostic theist.
Most people who identify as agnostics are agnostic atheists, they do not actively belief in a god.
If you want to separate agnostics and atheists, then you reduce atheism to a small subset of gnostic atheism (it can be known if god exists and doesn’t belief that god exists)
