101 points

It should be free

permalink
report
reply
24 points

May I introduce you to their last launch day tech demo… 1-2 Switch?

Yeah. You forgot about $60 launch day tech demo 1-2 Switch, didn’t you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The only reason they sold any was because the console released with like one game, which seems to be the same strategy this time around too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I remember buying breath of the wild, and sniperclips on day 1.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Okay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

“We’re greedy shits,” Trinen said. “The holes in our souls are bottomless and we hate our customers."

permalink
report
reply
66 points
*

Makes sense, but if it’s only $10 it should just be free. $10 isn’t worth the bad PR and they should want this tour thing in as many hands as possible.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

So it’s a $10 tutorial? Don’t care how expansive and cool it is, that’s just fucked. The project scope should’ve been adjusted to make sure it would be free.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Exactly! What sort of logic are they even trying to apply there? Basically saying “We put a lot of time into our tech demo, and it came out better than expected, so we’re going to charge for it!”

That’s just crazy.

The whole principle is that the intro experience is supposed to be free. It exists to get people pumped about the cool new thing they just bought and excited to play with it.

I guess Nintendo decided that - since you already bought the console - they don’t especially care if you are pumped or not. They already got your money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

This is one of the dumber decisions Nintendo has made, and they put out the Wii U.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Nintendo is being exclusively run by suits now. The era of a game company built by gamers is over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Nintendo was never ran by gamers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You’re thinking iwata, but that was a brief blip on Nintendo history. The OG CEO was a straight up suit. The man had no interest in videogames, only business. Which is why they practically had a monopoly over their hardware in the 80s and 90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The OG CEO is from the 1800s so yeah. And yes I’m thinking of Iwata. And look at what was produced during his tenure. That’s the Nintendo everyone is nostalgic about nowadays. 1989 Nintendo was a corporation throwing spaghetti at the wall, 2000’s Nintendo was streamlining the end gamer experience, 2020’s Nintendo is looking for an easy paycheck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It wasn’t even a bad system, just marketed terribly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I would dispute the claim it wasn’t a bad system.

The gamepad as a mandatory component really gimped it hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

Community stats

  • 9.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments