The paper shows some significant evidence that human coin flips are not as fair as I would have expected (plus probably a bunch of people would agree with me). There’s always some probability that this happened by chance, but this is pretty low.

Of course, we should be able to build a really accurate coin flipping machine, but I never would have expected such a bias for human flippers.

This is why science is awesome and challenging your ideas is important.

Edit: hopefully this is not too wrong a place, but Lemmy is small, and I didn’t know where else I could share such an exciting finding.

87 points

My favorite part is this:

Funding The authors have no funding to declare, and conducted this research in their spare time.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

“Funding: my mom gave me the coins out of her car cupholder”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I, too, was a poor grad student.

At that time I didn’t have a child to suck the life out of me. Just a dissertation.

(My hypothesis is that the child is worse, but my wife won’t let me conduct double blind, placebo controlled studies. Fortunately, we didn’t have twins…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

with their spare change

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

It’s just bizarre how high quality this evidence is. It’s probably because it’s so cheap to collect this data, and other science nerds are also science geeks like me.

Actual video of this many tests. Just data orgasm.

here it’s not ready yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I remember it feeling this way as a kid. That coins tend to land on the same side they start on.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

No! Bad treefrog.

If it “feels like” something, you’re probably fooling yourself.

Hard evidence. The easiest person to fool is yourself.

Edit: people, please don’t down vote treefrog. They are learning, and I am joking.

Be nice. This place is way toxic. I’m not sure how much more I can handle it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I read the beginning of the article. It confirmed my gut feeling. But I certainly didn’t run 300k coin flips to check lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jokes on me! I doubt most of my decisions and the logic that lead up to them!

Evidenced based research ftw, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If you’re still young, careful about too much imposter syndrome.

It took me until some reasonably extreme events for me to acknowledge that I was smart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

🤗

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I remember the opposite: heads always felt like “right way up” to us, but the result was almost always tails no matter who flipped it. To the extent that it still feels like the heads/tails percentage is the only positive version of the 50-50-90 rule, and I will never choose anything else.

Probably confirmation bias. But I wonder if the people in my family are wobblier than others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m with you, i used to try influence what i wanted by catching it.

If i wanted what i had flipped from i caught it palm up and then revealed. If i wanted the opposite i caught it and then revealed it onto my other hand.

As i got older i wouldn’t let people catch the coin only let it hit the ground and bounce around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Now I wanna know if I can get better at landing on the same side on purpose…

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Yeah… I had that thought for a second. Then I geeked out on the math and came to the same conclusion I had before.

Just as I won’t learn to play poker or count cards, I’m not learning and practicing this.

I’ve got other things to do with my limited life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I suspect you can, if there is a bias when no effort is applied I suspect you can train to increase it. I can think of two main factors at play - how fast the coin is rotating and how long it remains in the air. Both of which are under your control and I suspect you can train to become more reliable for though it might take a lot of effort. Or you can just learn to do this in 10 mins. Who is going to know the difference? It is cheating either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Great minds think alike! I just referenced this video in another thread on this post, without having read your comment first!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Or you can just learn to do this in 10 mins

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I have actually tried and practised that when I was a kid :-)

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Humans inherently create patterns and routine in their actions. It’s why on roulette wheels they change the direction and the size of the ball regularly to prevent the spinners from pattern spinning.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

They don’t all inherently choose to make it land on the up facing side. In fact, I believe this study is not even true. I call shenanigans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I look forward to your article explaining how you used the scientific method to provide counter evidence to their study.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments