308 points

Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I’d very much love that for you.

permalink
report
reply
130 points

Good thing this isn’t a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

didn’t washington own like the western 2/3 of Pennsylvania?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn’t seem like it in practice… :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they’ll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn’t get more “no representation” than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

How are billionaires being taxed unfairly, and without “Representation,” when they own our politicians?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

they have been too cheap thus far.

I’m pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Personnel is one thing.

Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

There is a reason they’re all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

That’s the crazy part, unless they’re “outlawed” billionaires should try and improve people’s lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It’s hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

Trump is imploding the entire economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

They could work to remove the destitution and desperation of working people. But if their workers weren’t in such dire straits, then they wouldn’t have so much power over them. Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance also have more time to pursue unionization and other political activities. Even if improving the lives of the people would objectively increase the wealth of the ultra-rich, it would still decrease their power. And ultimately, the only reason people ever obtain that level of wealth is because they desire power more than anything else. People who aren’t power-hungry monsters cash out and retire early long before they reach billionaire status.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

They truly believe in the Social Darwinist belief that no one is truly compassionate, empathetic, or altruistic. It’s just an act to gain attention, or an advantage.

They literally can’t understand it, and think it’s a stupid delusion. Their narcissism can’t comprehend that anyone would do anything without wanting something in return. And those who don’t believe that are stupid, and deserve to be exploited.

Because winners are winners, and losers and losers. It’s the natural order. EVERYONE is looking to take what’s yours, and will abuse, rob, and kill you if they can. Because that’s what they would do.

And then there’s the competition with other psychopaths in their peer group…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That level of greed is mental illness. A perpetual state of fear of losing what you have.

You have more than you can ever spend, ever, and you’re in constant fear that someone will take it from you. Because that’s would you do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

In the article, Amazon already back peddled and said it was just in the idea phase and they never really planned on implementing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’s brought down Tesla (bankrupt in 2 years, MMW), and now Amazon. We shpuld start a betting pool for who-s next. META? Google? Microsoft?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s trying to kill all those US companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Those corporations are what helped this “voting” travesty into power.

Corporations don’t have peoples’ well being in their sights except as target practice.

Power to the people, not corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

None of those Mega Corps are going anywhere.

They have virtually unlimited wealth. Amazon makes most of it’s money off of their server business.

Tesla, on the other hand, has always been smoke and mirrors. Good riddance. If you have their stock, sell now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s the thing that was always gonna happen. They were always gonna bring themselves and subsequently society down. It’s just the crit multi of Donald Trump a lot of people seemed not prepared for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
133 points

That’ll get the people grumbling.

Walmart should also do this.

Grocery stores too.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

Thoughts on how to make this happen:

  • Whenever a shopowner is already critical of Trump, call them and suggest it directly.

  • Ask your local cashiers and other store clerks how come the prices rose, and whether that really is all tariffs. Again and again. And ideally so that other shoppers overhear it.

  • Make angry social media posts explicitly asking the same, explicitly tagging your local store and/or the chain to which they belong, and muse about looking into their competitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I get that you want to aggrieve the owners but that last • tactic feeds into Reichwingers absolving Trump. Asking in person, where they have a chance to say, “yes, see this here is the tariffs amount” puts the blame where it belongs (and can also bring price-gouging into the light, because for sure some will happen).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Gouging will happen in every industry, by every corporation. The only ones that might not are locally owned, which has been dwindling since at least the 90s.

It happened with covid, it happened with bird flu, and it’s about to happen the biggest ever with tariffs as the excuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, it’s never going to happen in the first place

«Amazon moved to distance itself from the report, saying the idea had been considered by Amazon Haul, the company’s recently launched low-cost shopping hub, but had been rejected.

“The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson."

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points

Trump: “We’re increasing foreign prices because we want consumers to prefer buying American.”

Retailers: “These foreign goods are more expensive than American-made ones.”

Trump: “How dare you tell them that!”

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Cause we’re too stupid to already know…

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

Telling people how much the Trump Tax costs them is now considered “hostility”. Got it.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

You aren’t supposed to make the President look bad. That is illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

will be illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Retroactively

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“Is.”

He’s going after everyone who ever insulted, or defied him, actually, and perceived.

And most people are caving. To a deluded, emotionally crippled manchild who was handed everything his whole life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You are not supposed to wake up the zombie voters. That is illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hostility to his ego.

Narcissistic wounds are the worst, don’t you know?

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

would be a great add-on for firefox, though

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Incredibly hard to source that data from the outside. Even if you can identify the suppliers, different parts of an assembly may be classified differently, even between different importers who may have partial exemptions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not that they’ll do this, but Amazon should maliciously comply and hide the tariff metadata in the HTML for the browser extensions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

either way it would be free speech if an add-on or a website did it.

but those days are over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I bet, yes, good point

💡:

“Tariff GUESStimator for Amazon | Firefox”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

1000%

Same immediate reaction

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 28K

    Posts

  • 682K

    Comments