30 points
*

Haha, there’s still things embedded deep in code and in CPUs that go way back to the 80s. If only y’all knew. It’s all shit built on top of older shit, built on top of even older shit with kludges and hacks to glue it all together. Know why Windows has five different ways to access the same setting? Because if they get rid of the older methods, they break a ton of other shit that depends on it too. A house of cards or a Jenga tower.

A modern PC can STILL natively boot a DOS floppy from 1986 in legacy BIOS mode because of this.

Theres also examples in the corporate world where some companies are STILL running 70s mainframes, and use shiny new PCs as front end terminals that just connect to the same old backend.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

The control panel peaked at windows 7 though

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

everything Windows peaked with Windows 7.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Imma gonna stop you there and say the peak was Windows 2000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seriously, each new windows update just adds a fresh new coat of paint on top, as if to make finding the actually useful win 7 and xp menus, that are still there, harder.

Linux Mint feels to me like what windows 10/11 should’ve been

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, just don’t look deeper into symlinks in NTFS . And don’t look for extended file attributes in task scheduler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hell, the world still runs on an instruction set first designed for a 1976 CPU

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is super interesting and I had NO IDEA! Makes me very curious how much more efficient an entire fresh start might be with new tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah I can’t even think of any recent CPUs that aren’t based on previous designs. Even Apple’s new M1 is an ARM derivative, which itself is based on an ancient computer from the 80s known as the “Acorn”.

It’s a bit poetic. They were directly competing with Apple at the time, and Acorn named themselves such so that they would appear in front of Apple in the phone book. Of course, they haven’t existed in a long time, but 35-40 years later, Apple decides to use the great-grandson of Acorn’s CPU in their new products.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is one of the reasons why Linux doesn’t have a stable in-kernel API (or ABI for that matter): https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

CPU architecture wise, you can see the difference between cluttered, old x86 and ARM or even RISC-V chips. They just run so much more efficient, as you can tell with your phone lasting a day or two, or apple silicon consuming a fraction for the same performance.

An example for the ancient backend would be the flight pathing system DAL. (Wendover video)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fresh starts are always tempting, but they mean throwing out a ton of babies with that bathwater. Re-making old mistakes and solving them with fresh kludges in your nice, new, clean solution.

Like everything else in engineering, it’s a balancing act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Neanderthal Technology File System

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Not That Fresh System

permalink
report
reply
22 points

It’s newer than FAT (1977)

permalink
report
reply
18 points

But they change UI design every time Bill farts

permalink
report
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 264K

    Comments