8 points

I wouldn’t be surprised if DOGE nationalizes Tesla and puts it under Musk’s command. Gotta have Cyber Tanks for the regime, right?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

“Please put down your weapon. You now have 15 seconds to comply.”

Robocop’s corporate dystopian nightmare is closer and closer to reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s been here. RoboCop was satirizing all that same crap that was happening back then, as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Why do I feel like they are just pumping the stock up? What is to stop them from changing their mind and selling the moment they say “Just kidding!” . Rinse and repeat. Might as well since market manipulation is not illegal anymore if you are in the three comma club.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

The American consumer is a fucking idiot, this has a high chance of success as people forget about Elon and go back to buying them.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I mean, in fairness, do we have any qualms with the rest of the company? Elon was directly responsible for pretty much all of the cyber truck decisions. But the regular Tesla’s, aside from Elon prohibiting lidar and making false claims about self driving, are pretty decent. Without him, lidar might get implemented, the cyber truck will probably be scrapped, and real engineers will have their voices heard again.

Isn’t that kind of what we want from a company? To realize their errors and remove the cancerous parts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Tesla was garbage before Elon came out as a Nazi. The quality control is non existent and has been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes, and that’s another reason the company is failing, and I won’t buy a car from them. But, that’s not the point here, the point is Musk’s stupid antics are having major consequences for him. The only value he’s had for the company for years is as a mascot. The company succeeded so far as it has in spite of Musk, not because of him. Same for SpaceX.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re overvalued in the triple multiples compared to other American car companies because they’re a meme stock and halfway ran on government subsidies we paid for rather than putting it into education or social causes.

A step in the right direction isn’t good enough when there’s miles to tread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

A step in the right direction isn’t good enough when there’s miles to tread.

So all or nothing? Then you’ll get nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Why do you want a redemption arc for this overvalued company so bad? You holding a bag?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

not OP, I wouldn’t mind a redemption arc, they were pretty f’ing cool before he got there.

Everything that was on the market before tesla was a facimilie of a thousand other cars before it. They did something (for better or worse) different. Learning what not to do has power in itself.

After they took the leap, all of a sudden a lot of other companies started throwing out prototypes. I don’t think the Volt I drive today would have happened if they didn’t go there first.

Of course things got a lot worse as Elon butted in further and they started pushing QC out and cybertruck BS in.

I think they’re likely irredeemable, but I’d like to see another company follow in their footsteps and keep pushing the tech further, not in a garbage dumpster direction, but in a simpler and more effective direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you’re probably giving a potential new CEO too much credit. You really think that Elon will just relinquish control over his company and let the CEO do whatever? Not a chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

His company? You say that like Elon owns Tesla. He doesn’t even have a controlling share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s the board of directors that has that control.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Calling a company, which actively vendor-locks pretty much the whole car using their propiatery software while having the worst warranty ever, pretty decent is beyond me.

Especially a company belonging to the car lobby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To be fair, I think people get blinded by the fact that Elon is a massive twat, and miss all the other little bits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We do, as he’s the biggest shareholder 🙃

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

He will still have a shitload of shares. I don’t need to get into the nitty-gritty detail of whether I hate the company or its products; his stock in it is what allowed him to buy the election for Trump, so fuck Tesla.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

But did Tesla facilitate that or was Tesla worn like a puppet by an investor(Elon). There’s a distinct difference and what I’m asking. Do we blame every company that gets gutted by Venture Capitalists? Do they have no path to redemption?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

do we have any qualms with the rest of the company

Let’s say they can him. Let’s say he is somehow compelled to sell off stock until he’s a minitority shareholder. His ego would not let that go. To say he’s still filthy fucking rich would do a disservice to filth. You can’t separate him from this mess. He’d just come back.

If he just disappeared tomorrow, no chance of repurchasing it, just maybe but we need to see:

  • Unions everywhere
  • OSHA up their ass
  • Put some fucking LiDAR on the cars
  • Reinvent quality control
  • Reinvent a safety program so that people can’t burn to death locked in their car.
  • Fully support individual resale.
  • Fully support 3rd party service centers.
  • Every car is modified until it gets at least a three-star crash rating
  • All features are purchased with the car, if your seat has a heater, you can use it for free.
  • One feature is “we don’t sell” or “store your data in a way that can identify you”
  • Car updates are transparent and unless a true safety hazard, optional.
  • No more of this screwing around with odometers to speed past warranty availability and everyone gets 30k more miles and another year because they were assholes.
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Are you assuming Elon would no longer own stock or have other ways he’d continue to profit from Tesla?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I understand completely why you’d want Elon to fail, but why would you want Tesla to fali?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Endless government subsidies inflating the stock astronomically above any other normal car company, as paid for with American tax dollars.

As a company, horrible QC and manufacturing standards compared to even the worst of their peers, and the insistance on self-driving tech that doesn’t even need to exist for their vehicles to function.

Tesla is a shitcoin turned into a company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Because they’re not magically taking away his stock shares. If Tesla succeeds so does Musk, no matter what position he holds. Nothing changes when oligarchs who will happily take food out of children’s mouths to enrich themselves and send US citizen children with Cancer away never suffer any consequences.

And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that Tesla cars suck ass now compared to similar segments from competitors. They’re a net negative in the industry and in their influence on humanity. EVs are going to continue to take up more market share worldwide without them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I’ve been expecting this, and it isn’t the only thing coming.

Before the recent earnings call, which was far worse than we even expected, we hadn’t heard much from him over the previous few weeks. He knew that terrible call was coming, and had been laying low, probably hoping things would improve some before making what he knew would be a disastrous earnings call. It was the equivalent of watching your diet 3 days before a doctor’s appointment, hoping your weight gain and cholesterol increase won’t be as bad as you know it is.

Also, it was a safe bet that his board of directors was livid, and that he had been ordered by his board to get back to work, or be removed as CEO of Tesla, and now it looks like they are moving toward with firing him. So why that decision?

The probable reason is that now that the earnings call confirmed what everyone suspected, there is almost certainly a shareholder class-action suit brewing over his reckless and irresponsible behavior over the last several months, which has directly caused severe, and probably irreparable damage to the company’s brand image AND it’s sales around the world, as well as tanking the stock price, an unforgiveable sin in the investing world. Now that the bubble has popped, it will never inflate again. As future earnings reports are released, and sales continue to slide, the stock will continue to decline, and the cycle will continue until bankruptcy. And it is all traceable to Skum’s self-indulgent, egotistical behavior.

The only question is will Skum be the only defendant, or will the lawsuit also name the individual members of the board, for not reigning him in, or firing him. They don’t want to be sued alongside him, so they are forcing him to get back to work saving Tesla, or even getting rid of him altogether, thus letting them off the hook for legal liability.

Its doubtful Skum, or anyone else, will be able to save Tesla at this point, its almost certainly too late. It is also probably too late to avoid a shareholder lawsuit. Investors have lost millions of dollars, not due to the vagaries of the market, but due to Skum’s outrageous behavior, like throwing up celebratory Nazi salutes on national TV, which, as CEO, he should have realized would damage his company and its investors significantly.

And arguing that he didn’t recognize the danger in advance is no excuse at all for a CEO, who should have been able to predict the response to his self-indulgent ego bender.

Shareholders have lost many millions, and they won’t just let that go with an “Oh well.” He’s likely going to get sued, and the board is just making sure they don’t go down with him.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Yeah, except he and his brother own majority shares in Tesla and pretty much hand-picked the board. I bet this is nothing but performative; they get a new ‘face’ for the company while he still runs Tesla from the background, Wizard of Oz style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

As of February 28, 2025, Elon Musk owns approximately 12.8% of Tesla

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He never ran tesla, he profits from it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh, he runs it. Just not well. He sucks at real CEO work like he sucks at everything else in his life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

He was ousted as CEO once, and he’s put in preventative measures in every company since.

If they’re replacing him, it’s with his blessing specifically to try and prevent losses. And you can bet your ass that he’ll be a “special employee/consultant” that has the power to veto the new CEO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

me me! pick me!

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I vote for this guy… Oh wait I have no shares of TSLA

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s OK. The most important thing is to be incredibly rich. Can you work that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hmmm sorry no. Still pay taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 28K

    Posts

  • 685K

    Comments