A group of House Republicans from New York are introducing a resolution to expel Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., from Congress.

“Today, I’ll be introducing an expulsion resolution to rid the People’s House of fraudster George Santos,” Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, R-N.Y., said in a post on the social media platform X.

He said the resolution will be co-sponsored by fellow New York House Republicans Nick LaLota, Mike Lawler, Marc Molinaro, Nick Langworthy and Brandon Williams.

Booting Santos would require a two-thirds vote of the entire House.

The move comes a day after federal prosecutors issued Santos a 23-count superseding indictment alleging he committed identity theft, fraud and other offenses. Santos has said he plans on fighting the charges and pleaded not guilty to the charges in the original 13-count indictment earlier this year.

141 points

Imagine being such a piece of shit that even the Republicans don’t want to associate with you.

permalink
report
reply
119 points

It’s because he fucked with their money…

He made up like 500k in donations so that the Republican party would “match” and they gave him 250k.

So now the other Republicans who could have gotten that money are pissed

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Also, they’re idiots for just taking his word for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The schadenfreude … by the gods it’s delightful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Muh bribery is unsecure!1

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Winner winner chicken dinner. They don’t give a fuck about all the bigots and rapists in office, it’s sticking your hand in the cookie jar that’s the real sin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

It took a 23-count indictment to make it happen, however.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You have to break 50 indictments to be considered presidential crownable

FTFY

Don’t think there’s a word for the appointment of a dictator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It wasn’t so much the 23 counts as it was the fact that he basically stole money from the Republican party. Theft of (Republican) money is !

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I don’t really get it. Santos is the most Republican to have every Republicaned. He’s a lying, grifting, fraudster who knows practically nothing about anything and only got where he was by lying his way in and betraying the trust of everyone who backed him. He’s so unhinged he doesn’t even know where his lies stopped.

He’s like the American conservative mascot. I’m surprised they don’t name him Speaker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You don’t steal from the rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s the oldest rule from the oldest thieves’ guilds from before there were cities: It’s OK to take a little from Jimmy’s cut, maybe OK to take a little off what you were gonna give to your mother, but you never. NEVER. take anything from the capo. The boss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s all a stunt. These republicans are just saving their own skin, fully knowing that vast majority of their own party won’t expel this asshat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’s not popular and doesn’t bring in any money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Plot twist: the Republicans will now fail to elect a speaker so the resolution will never be read.

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*

Yeah, they’ve given George Santos a perverse incentive to vote against any viable speaker candidate to prevent this measure from coming to the floor. Or he could make his vote contingent on the new speaker not bringing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Can’t he also bring up a vote to unseat any speaker? The Gift That Keeps Giving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That was the deal with McCarthy, not clear if that’s the deal that anyone else will have

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He can bring up the vote, but that doesn’t mean it will succeed. If they want him gone, they will vote it down and then vote him out. Or they will just do the vote him out first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I was gonna say…can they even do that without a Speaker?

So this is just performance, it seems, with no ability or intention of following through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m not sure; will have to look that up. But yeah, I hope she either laughed right in McHenry’s face or at least replied on her official letterhead “Lol, no.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’s New York GOP, not the entire party. The New Yorkers need to have some cover, but know that the rest of the party will kill the resolution.

Political theater.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

But it takes 2/3 to remove him. No way there are enough Republicans with morals and integrity for that to happen.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Wait so only republicans vote? I thought it was the whole house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

It is the whole House. Right now, there are 221 Republicans and 212 Democrats. So 289 votes are needed to expel Santos. You can safely assume that all Democrats will vote to expel so the Republicans will need to come up with 77 more votes. This is a little over half. If half of all Republicans can’t agree on this, it will fail. A little over a third of Republicans would need to vote for this.

Edit: 289 votes are needed, not 325.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

How did you get 325? There are 435 members normally (433 assuming your numbers are right with vacancies, which seems believable.) 2/3 of 435 is 290.

So you’d only need ~78 republicans with morals. Still wouldn’t happen, but weirder things have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It is, but you’d need a substantial portion of Republicans to break ranks and vote to expel a member of their own party (reducing their vote margin) in order to expel him, since the Republicans are the majority

I hope to see it but certainly not holding my breath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This will go nowhere. If they can let him cast his votes from prison, they will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It would still be nice to see which of them think that he is part of the gang.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

the social media platform X

It’s still funny that people have to say stuff like this now instead of just “Twitter”.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’d prefer if they’d just say “stupid fuck Elon Musk’s X”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Proof your rebranding has failed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It looks like he went for a thorough de-brand more than a catchy rebrand.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 386K

    Comments